Evaluation of continuing medical education: Making a difference

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(86)90078-XGet rights and content

Abstract

This article is the fifth in a series of continuing health professional education and it focuses on the evaluation of continuing medical education (CME). Evaluation is the final step in the overall instructional design cycle in that it measures the effectiveness of CME. This article presents a decision-making flow chart which illustrates a means of determining what kind of an evaluation is appropriate for a given educational activity. The major types of evaluations are formative and summative, each having cognitive, psychomotor and affective categories. The evaluation data sources should be triangulated and may be either objective or subjective. There should be clear linage between the course goals/objectives, the evaluation measures and the results of the evaluation. This will improve the CME process and make it more cost effective.

References (41)

  • NA Coldeway et al.

    Educational needs in physical medicine and rehabilitation: foundation of continuing medical education

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1983)
  • BG Cox et al.
  • SRW DipObst

    Evaluation of continuing medical education

    NZ Med J

    (1975)
  • Division of Educational Policy and Development

    Stating Objectives

    Cont Med Educ Newsletter

    (June, 1983)
  • JH Donegan et al.

    Use of test results from ASA workshops to evaluate workshop effectiveness

    J Med Educ

    (1976)
  • LR Gay

    Educational Evaluation and Measurement: Competencies for Analysis and Application

    (1980)
  • PM Gottlieb

    Comments on self-assessment programs

    Ann Allergy

    (1975)
  • PE Greaves et al.

    Impact evaluation: competency-based approach

    Nurse Admin Q

    (Spring 1983)
  • NE Gronlund

    Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching

    (1971)
  • DS Gullion et al.

    Effect of individualized practice-based CME program on physician performance and patient outcomes

    West J Med

    (1983)
  • View full text