Abstract
This paper investigates the impacts of emotion enhancement on self-identity and assesses possible ethical consequences of these changes. It introduces the crucial dimensions related to the self which emotion enhancement may endanger—emotion standards, narrative identity, self-objectification, and freedom of hope and pursuit. I argue that the ethically salient issue with emotion enhancement is its impact on autonomous agency—whether one’s actions and beliefs are one’s own, and how the relational autonomy may be hindered or fostered. The changes arising from emotion enhancement may be considered to belong to the same self as long as such changes do not alter the individual’s internal value system and the individual identifies with such changes. That being said, emotion enhancement remains unjustified in terms of freedom. Even if the emotional enhancement is performed out of free will, it does not bring freedom in the true sense, and thus threatens the subject’s special kind of being as the same rational agent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data included in this study are available upon request by contact with the author.
References
Bergmann, T. O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021). Inferring causality from noninvasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(2), 195–225.
Bostrom, N., & Roache, R. (2014). Smart policy: Cognitive enhancement and the public interest. In J. Savulescu (Ed.), Enhancing human capacities (pp. 138–149). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bratman, M. E. (2017). Rational planning agency. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 80, 25–48.
Conrad, P., & Potter, D. (2004). Human growth hormone and the temptations of biomedical enhancement. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26(2), 184–215.
Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy, 60, 685–700.
Drummond, J. J. (2021). Self-identity and personal identity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 1–13.
Earp, B. (2018). Psychedelic moral enhancement. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 83, 415–439.
Eberl, J. T. (2018). Can prudence be enhanced? Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 43(5), 506–526.
Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–370.
Fan, R. P. (2010). Genetic enhancement revisited: Response to open peer commentaries. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10, W6–W8.
Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of hedonism (pp. 38–55). Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, F., Goddard, E., Viaña, J. N. M., Carter, A., & Horne, M. (2017). I miss being me: Phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neuroscience, 8(2), 96–109.
Glannon, W. (2016). Neuroethics. In H. T. Have (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global bioethics (pp. 1999–2010). Springer International Publishing.
Gligorov, N. (2016). Neuroethics and the scientific revision of common sense (pp. 53–74). Springer Netherlands.
Goering, S., Klein, E., Dougherty, D. D., & Widge, A. S. (2017). Staying in the loop: Relational agency and identity in next-generation DBS for Psychiatry. AJOB Neuroscience, 8(2), 59–70.
Harris, J., & Julian, S. (2015). A debate about moral enhancement. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(1), 8–22.
Hartogsohn, I. (2018). The meaning-enhancing properties of psychedelics and their mediator role in psychedelic therapy, spirituality, and creativity. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00129
Helm, B. W. (2009). Emotions as evaluative feelings. Emotion Review, 1(3), 248–255.
Huang, P. H. (2018). Moral enhancement, self-governance, and resistance. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 43(5), 547–567.
Husain, M., & Mitul, A. M. (2011). Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 28–36.
Hyman, J. (2015). Action, knowledge, and will (pp. 14–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ilieva, I., Boland, J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Objective and subjective cognitive enhancing effects of mixed amphetamine salts in healthy people. Neuropharmacology, 64, 496–505.
Jecker, N. S., & Ko, A. L. (2017). Is that the same person? Case Studies in Neurosurgery. AJOB Neuroscience, 8(3), 160–170.
Jotterand, F., & Giordano, J. (2011). Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation and personal identity: Ethical questions, and neuroethical approaches for medical practice. International Review of Psychiatry, 23(5), 476–485.
Juengst, E. (1997). Can enhancement be distinguished from prevention in genetic medicine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 22, 125–142.
Kant, I. (2003). Practical rational criticism (p. 180). Trans. X. M. Deng. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants (pp.1–17). Penguin Group.
Kraemer, F. (2013). Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(12), 757–760.
Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. In P. H. Nidditch (Ed.), The Clarendon edition of the works of John Locke: An essay concerning human understandin (pp. 343–88). Clarendon Press.
Mackenzie, C., & Walker, M. (2015). Neurotechnologies, personal identity, and the ethics of authenticity. In J. Clausen & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of neuroethics (pp. 373–392). Springer.
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238.
Mcconnell, D. (2013). DBS, personal identity, and diachronic value. AJOB Neuroscience, 4(2), 47–49.
Miller, M. A., Bershad, A. K., & De Wit, H. (2015). Drug effects on responses to emotional facial expressions. Behavioural Pharmacology, 26(6), 571–579.
Møller, S. (2022). How moral neuroenhancement impacts autonomy and agency. Bioethics, 36, 794–801.
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124.
Mordacci, R. (2018). Cognitive enhancement and personal identity. Humana. Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7(26), 141–152.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia (pp. 42–45). Basic Books.
Ross, W. D. (1939). Foundations of ethics (p. 138). Clarendon Press.
Savulescu, J., ter Meulen, R., & Kahane, G. (Eds.). (2011). Enhancing human capacitiespp (153-258). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schechtman, M. (2004). Self-expression and self-control. Ratio, 17(4), 409–427.
Schechtman, M. (2014). Staying alive: Personal identity, practical concerns, and the unity of a life (pp. 99–100). Oxford University Press.
Schermer, M. (2015). Ethics of pharmacological mood enhancement. In J. Clausen & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of neuroethics (pp. 1177–1190). Springer.
Scully, J. L. (2004). What is a disease? EMBO Reports, 5(7), 650–653.
Shoemaker, S. (2015). Persistence and properties. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(3), 433–448.
Shoemaker, D. (2019). Personal identity and ethics. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-ethics/. Accessed Oct 2019.
Snoek, A. (2017). Does DBS alienate identity or does it simply fail to restore identity already eroded by illness? AJOB Neuroscience, 8(2), 114–115.
Stein, D. J. (2012). Psychopharmacological enhancement: A conceptual framework. Philosophy Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-7-5
Swinburne, R. (2009). Personal identity: The dualist theory. In J. P. Lizza (Ed.), Defining the beginning and end of life: Readings on personal identity and bioethics (pp. 42–53). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tolleneer, J., Sterckx, S., & Bonte, P. (2013). Athletic enhancement, human nature and ethics: Threats and opportunities of doping technologies (pp.89–148). Springer.
Velleman, J. D. (1992). What happens when someone acts. Mind, 101(403), 461–481.
Vrecko, S. (2013). Just how cognitive is “cognitive enhancement”? On the significance of emotions in university students’ experiences with study drugs. AJOB Neuroscience, 4(1), 4–12.
Funding
This work was supported by the major project of the National Social Science Fund of China, “Contemporary Approaches to Personal Identity” (Grant No. 18ZDA029) and the Major Project of the Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 22JJD720005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author confirms that there are no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer
No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by the author for publication. I would like to declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under simultaneous consideration elsewhere.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fei, D. Self-identity in emotion enhancement. AJPH 2, 59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-023-00113-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-023-00113-y