Skip to main content
Log in

Biomedical Specialized Masters Programs: What are They and How do They Meet the Needs of Employers?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undergraduate biomedical engineering programs are better preparing students to enter industry; however, some positions and sectors expect students to enter with a higher level degree. As an alternative to research-focused graduate programs, Specialized Master’s Programs (SMPs) cater to students with a variety of educational backgrounds and focus on applying translational science, business, and engineering approaches to creating sustainable healthcare and medical technology solutions. Despite specific industry calls for more professional programs, little has been written about how well existing programs meet the needs of industry. Representatives of three different SMPs came together to study how skills and topics covered in these programs align with the health technology industry and how the perspectives of alumni of SMPs align with the goals of these programs. Several workshops were held at academic conferences, and multiple surveys were distributed to program faculty, alumni, and representatives from industry. Responses to these surveys show that alumni and faculty of SMPs are in strong agreement about the purpose and value of these programs. Industry indicated that general skills such as communication and teamwork were more important than specialized topics, such as prototyping and regulatory environments. Presenting industry perspectives on the importance, scarcity, and training of skills provides a more detailed picture of what SMPs can offer. Students and SMP faculty would benefit from having a more direct perspective from industry employers who might hire SMP graduates. There may be opportunities for SMPs and other programs to highlight existing content that is well aligned with industry within their curricula without the need for additional curriculum development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available by request

Code Availability

None.

References

  1. Blagg K. The Rise of Master’s Degrees: Master’s Programs Are Increasingly Diverse and Online [Internet]. Urban Institute. 2018 Jan. https://proxy2.library.illinois.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED592626

  2. Bosch G, Casadevall A. Graduate biomedical science education needs a new philosophy. MBio. 2017;8(6):e01539-e1617. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01539-17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruzzi MS, Linehan JH. BioInnovate Ireland—fostering entrepreneurial activity through medical device innovation training. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1834–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0787-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caplar N, Tacchella S, Birrer S. Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nat Astron. 2017;1:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choe NH, Borrego M. Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers. J Eng Educ. 2020;109(2):325–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Ana FJ, Umstead KA, Phillips GJ, Conner CP. Value driven innovation in medical device design: a process for balancing stakeholder voices. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1811–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0779-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dion ML, Sumner JL, Mitchell SM. Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Polit Anal. 2018;26:312–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, Zurn P, Shinohara RT, Bassett DS. The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2001.01002, 2020.

  9. Enderle JD, Ropella KM, Kelsa DM, Hallowell B. Ensuring that biomedical engineers are ready for the real world. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2002;21(2):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2002.1000187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Federer LM, Lu YL, Joubert DJ. Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(1):52–7. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.008.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuhrmann CN. Enhancing graduate and postdoctoral education to create a sustainable biomedical workforce. Hum Gene Ther. 2016;27(11):871–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2016.154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gohar F, Gohar A, Hülskamp G, Debus O. The translational medicine professional: a bridge between bench and bedside? Front Med. 2018;5:294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gould J. How to build a better PhD. Nature. 2015;528(7580):22–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/528022a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang-Saad A, Stegemann J, Shea L. Developing a model for integrating professional practice and evidence-based teaching practices into BME curriculum. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(2):881–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02427-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamison CSE, Vempala V, Wang A, Stegemann JP, Huang-Saad A. What are biomedical engineering employers looking for in new hires? A Qualitative Synthesis. In: 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) [Internet]. Lincoln, NE, USA: IEEE; 2021 [cited 2022 Oct 30]. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637148

  16. Jang H. Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. J Sci Educ Technol. 2016;25(2):284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jia X. Translational medicine: creating the crucial bidirectional bridge between bench and bedside. IJMS. 2016;17(11):1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111918.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurpinski K, Johnson T, Kumar S, Desai T, Li S. Mastering translational medicine: interdisciplinary education for a new generation. Sci Transl Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman MS. An Insider’s Perspective on Entrepreneurial Program Development at a Small and a Large Institution. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1889–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0778-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynch C. The case for professional science Master’s degrees. Bioscience. 2012;62(8):705–6. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maliniak D, Powers R, Walter BF. The gender citation gap in international relations. Int Organ. 2013;67:889–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Masse J, Yates T, Krzic M, Unc A, Chen ZC, Quideau S, et al. Identifying learning outcomes for a Canadian pedology field school: addressing the gap between new graduates’ skills and the needs of the current job market. Can J Soil Sci. 2019;99(4):458–71. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2019-0040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell SM, Lange S, Brus H. Gendered citation patterns in international relations journals. Int Stud Perspect. 2013;14:485–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nocera T, Ortiz-Rosario A, Shermadou A, Delaine D. How Do Biomedical Engineering Graduates Differ from Other Engineers? Bridging the Gap Between BME and Industry: a Case Study. In: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings [Internet]. Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences; 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 30]. p. 30578. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30578

  25. O*NET OnLine [Internet]. National Center for O*NET Development; 2022. (Browse by Basic Skills). https://www.onetonline.org/find/descriptor/browse/2.A

  26. Parent MM, Deephouse DL. A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. J Bus Ethics. 2007;75(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9533-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rivera C, Huang-Saad A, Woodcock C, Wang A. Preparing Early-career Biomedical Undergraduates Through Investigations of Stakeholder Needs: A Qualitative Analysis. In: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings [Internet]. Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences; 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 30]. p. 35079. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35079

  28. Rosandich RG. The Implications of ASME Vision 2030 for Mechanical Engineering Programs. In: 2011 ASEE Northern Midwest Regional Conference. Duluth, MN; 2011.

  29. Rosenzweig EQ, Hecht CA, Priniski SJ, Canning EA, Asher MW, Tibbetts Y, et al. Inside the STEM pipeline: Changes in students’ biomedical career plans across the college years. Sci Adv. 2021;7(18):eabe0985. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe0985.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rousseeuw PJ. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vest, Charles M. Educating engineers for 2020 and beyond. National Academy of Engineering (2005)

  32. Watts SW, Chatterjee D, Rojewski JW, Shoshkes Reiss C, Baas T, Gould KL, et al. Faculty perceptions and knowledge of career development of trainees in biomedical science: What do we (think we) know? PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0210189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. White JA, Gaver DP, Butera RJ, Choi B, Dunlop MJ, Grande-Allen KJ, et al. Core competencies for undergraduates in bioengineering and biomedical engineering: findings, consequences, and recommendations. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(3):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02468-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yazdi Y, Acharya S. A new model for graduate education and innovation in medical technology. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(9):1822–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0869-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yock PG. Biodesign: the process of innovating medical technologies. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 839.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmerman AM. Navigating the path to a biomedical science career. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9): e0203783. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Biomedical Engineering Society for allowing us to host BMES Special Sessions, which formed the basis for much of the community discussions. We would also like to thank the Clinical and Industry Committee, especially Ben Noe, for helping to recruit participants from industry for the survey. We would like to thank another collaborator, Jeffrey S. Garanich, who was part of the original research team that formed the idea for the workshops and data collection. We thank The Grove Foundation for funding the workshops.

Funding

The Grove Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS: Sabriya was part of the original research team that formed the idea for the paper and data collection. Sabriya contributed to the background section and contributed to the discussion of results and editing of the manuscript. EB: Eliot performed data analysis and prepared figures for the results sections. Eliot also contributed to the literature review and writing of the manuscript. M particularly the results and discussion section. MJO: Michael was part of the original research team that formed the idea for the paper and data collection. Michael contributed to the background section and contributed to the discussion of results and editing of the manuscript. JRA: Jennifer was part of the original research team that formed the idea for the paper and data collection. Jennifer mentored the graduate student on the paper (Bethke) and led the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer R. Amos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Exempt Approval by the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign IRB# 14864.

Consent to Participate

None.

Consent for Publication

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 100 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stukes, S., Bethke, E., O’Donnell, M.J. et al. Biomedical Specialized Masters Programs: What are They and How do They Meet the Needs of Employers?. Biomed Eng Education 3, 291–301 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00115-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00115-5

Keywords

Navigation