Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting active learning in medical education using the peer teaching model: perceptions of senior medical students

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This study aimed at describing how well the goals of a peer teaching initiative implemented over a two-year period were achieved at a South African medical school from the students’ perspective. We conducted a mixed method study to elicit the perspectives of 5th year medical students who had recently completed a course that involved peer teaching during the 2016 academic year. Participants were purposefully sampled, and data were collected through focus group discussion (FGD) for the qualitative phase, and semi-structured questionnaires for the quantitative phase of the study. The FGDs were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed thematically, using an inductive approach to identify the emerging themes. The quantitative data obtained from the semi-structured questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive analysis, and the results presented in percentages and frequencies. A total of twenty-seven respondents took part in three FGDs, each group comprised nine participants. The number of completed semi-structured questionnaires were sixty-six. Three major themes emerged from the results namely, being a peer teacher, being a peer learner, and students’ recommendations. The results showed that the implementation of peer teaching exercise motivated active learning among the students who ‘taught’ their peers, firstly, through their preparation for the peer teaching activity and secondly through the actual teaching itself. However, this kind of motivation was not reported by the participants who were not opportune to ‘teach’ during the exercise. The implementation of peer teaching model is effective in promoting active learning among medical students. Further research is needed to refine the strategies adopted and to identify alternative activities other than “teaching” during peer teaching exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abela J (2009) Adult learning theories and medical education: a review. Malta Med J 21(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Artino AR, Rochelle JSL, During SJ (2010) Second year medical student’s motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievements. Med Teach 44:1203–1212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagg RB, Tagg J (1995) From learning to teaching—a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27(6):12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B (2013) Integration, and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach 35:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bene KL, Bergus G (2014) When teachers become learners. Fam Med 46(10):783–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell CC, Elison JA (1991) Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. George Washington University, Washington. Ashe-Eric Higher Education Report 1

  • Buckman R (2002) Communications and emotions. BMJ 325:679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C (2014) Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 14:115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Grave WD, van der Vleuten C (2005) Problem based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ 39:732–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink LD (2003) Creating significant learning experiences An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J (eds) (2015) CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, Garcia P, Ke Y, Kelley P, Kistnasamy B, Meleis A, Naylor D, Pablos-Mendez A, Reddy S, Scrimshaw S, Sepulveda J, Serwadda D, Zurayk H (2010) Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 376(9756):1923–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furmedge DS, Iwata K, Gill D (2014) Peer-assisted learning- beyond teaching: how can medical students contribute to the undergraduate curriculum? Med Teach 36:812–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graffam B (2007) Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 29:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory A, Walker I, McLaughlin K, Peets AD (2011) Both preparing to teach and teaching positively impact learning outcomes for peer teachers. Med Teach 33:e417–e422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gukas ID, Miles S, Heylings DJ, Leinster SJ (2008) Medical student’s perceptions of peer feedback on an anatomy student-selected study module. Med Teach 30:812–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulpinar MA, Yegen BC (2005) Interactive lecturing for meaningful learning in large groups. Med Teach 27(7):590–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakitsiou DE, Markou A, Kyriakou P, Pieri M, Abuaita M, Bourgousis E, Hido T, Tsatsaragkou A, Boukali A, de Burbure C, Dimoliatis IDK (2012) The good student is more than a listener—the 12+1 roles of the medical student. Med Teach 34:e1–e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember D (1997) A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learn Instr 7:255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mega C, Ronconi L, Beni RD (2013) What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning and motivation contribute to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol 106(1):121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad N. Abu, Baker N, Zulkifli SM, Norfaezah L, Hao TW, Khing SS (2012) Implementation of peer teaching among medical students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 60:529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AJ, Nelson SV, Linn AMJ, Raw LE, Kildea HB, Tonkin AL (2013) Tomorrow’s educators…today? Implementing near-peer teaching for medical students. Med Teach 35:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun R, Elliot AJ, Maier MA (2009) Achievement goals and achievement emotions: testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. J Educ Psychol 101(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole G (2012) The culturally sculpted self in self- directed learning. Med Educ 46:728–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees EL, Quinn PJ, Davies B, Fotheringham V (2016) How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 38(8):829–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer D, Pashler H (2012) Learning styles: where is the evidence? Med Educ 46:630–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R (1999) “I don’t know: the three most important words in education. BMJ 318:7193

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JA, Jordan RK (1999) Leaner centered approaches in medical education. BMJ 318:1280–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DCM, Hamdy H (2013) Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No 83. Med Teach 35:e156–e1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Cate O, Durning S (2007) Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach 29(6):546–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping KJ (1996) The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: a typology and review of the literature. High Educ 32:321–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topping KJ (2005) Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol 25(6):631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate O (2008) What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 42:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt JD, Verloop N (1999) Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learn Instr 9:257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne SJ, Fortner SA, Kitzes JA, Timm C, Kalishman S (2013) Cause and effect? The relationship between student’s perception of the medical school learning environment and academic performance on USMLE Step 1. Med Teach 35:376–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimar M (2013) Learner-centered teaching: five key changes to practice, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adegoke O. Adefolalu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at the University of Stellenbosch and the Sefako Makgatho University Research Ethics Committee (S15/09/203).

Informed consent

The participants were invited on a voluntary basis; full explanation was given in the form of an information leaflet and a letter of informed consent was completed and signed by all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukrajh, V., Adefolalu, A.O. & Louw, A.J.N. Promoting active learning in medical education using the peer teaching model: perceptions of senior medical students. SN Soc Sci 1, 158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00170-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00170-1

Keywords

Navigation