Skip to main content
Log in

Could the “case for Revising the Date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa” be flawed?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of History of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In “A case for Revising the Date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa” Narahari Achar (Indian J Hist Sci 35(3):173–183, 2000) has proposed a date of 1800BCE for the composition of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa and the star δ Cap as yogatārā of nakṣatra Śraviṣṭhā. The study presented here demonstrates that neither a unique epoch of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa nor a unique yogatārā of nakṣatra Śraviṣṭhā can be determined with the criteria proposed by Narahari Achar. Moreover, the proposed yogatārā does not satisfy the configuration of celestial objects at the start of a yuga described in Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AB :

Aitareya Brāhmaṇa

KS :

Kāṭhaka Saṃhitā

KB :

Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇa

MS :

Maitrāyaṇī Saṃhitā

TB :

Taittirīya Brāhmaṇa

RV :

Ṛgveda Saṃhitā

RJ :

Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa; Ṛgvedic recension

YJ :

Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa; Yajurvedic recension

References

  • Abhyanker, (1991). Misidentification of some Indian nakatrās. Indian Journal of History of Science, 26, 1–10.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. (1935). Translation of Sūrya-Siddhānta. In P. Gangooly (Ed.), A Text-book of Hindu Astronomy with Notes and Appendix (pp. 202–254). Calcutta: University of Calcutta.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dikshit, S. B. (1969). Bharatiya Jyotish Sastra, (tr. R.V. Vaidya) (pp. 69–70). Calcutta: Government of India Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondhalekar, P. (2013). The Time Keepers of the Vedas (pp. 210–211). New Delhi: Manohar Publishers & Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunger, H., & Pingree, D. (1989). “MULAPIN: An Astronomical Compendium in Cuneiform”, Archiv für Orientforschung 24 (pp. 10–11). Austria: F. Berger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, A. B. (1920). Rigveda Brahmanas, the Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda (p. 453). London: Harvard Oriental Series 25. (Reprinted 1998. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).

  • Krisciunas, K., & Schaefer, B. E. (1991). A model of the brightness of moonlight. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 103(667), 1033.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppanna Sastry, T. S. (1984). In K. V. Sarma (Ed.), Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa of Lagadha. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.

  • Narahari Achar, B. N. (2000). A case for revising the date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa. Indian Journal of History of Science, 35(3), 173–183.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, D. (1970–1980). History of mathematical astronomy in India. In C. Coulston (Ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography (p. 533). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

  • Pingree, D. (1973). The Mesopotamian origin of early Indian mathematical astronomy. Journal of History of Astronomy, 4, 1–12.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, B. E. (1985). Predicting heliacal rising and setting. Sky & Telescope, 70(3), 261–263.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Subbarayappa, B. V., & Sarma, K. V. (1985). Indian Astronomy: A Source Book (Section 12). Bombay: Nehru Centre.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This analysis has also used data obtained via HORIZONS Web-Interface, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA. I would like to thank Patrick Wallace (of TPOINT SOFTWARE) for the Positional Astronomy Software SLALIB, used in this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabhakar Gondhalekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gondhalekar, P. Could the “case for Revising the Date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa” be flawed?. Indian J Hist. Sci. 56, 14–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-021-00001-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-021-00001-5

Keywords

Navigation