Abstract
In “A case for Revising the Date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa” Narahari Achar (Indian J Hist Sci 35(3):173–183, 2000) has proposed a date of 1800BCE for the composition of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa and the star δ Cap as yogatārā of nakṣatra Śraviṣṭhā. The study presented here demonstrates that neither a unique epoch of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa nor a unique yogatārā of nakṣatra Śraviṣṭhā can be determined with the criteria proposed by Narahari Achar. Moreover, the proposed yogatārā does not satisfy the configuration of celestial objects at the start of a yuga described in Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AB :
-
Aitareya Brāhmaṇa
- KS :
-
Kāṭhaka Saṃhitā
- KB :
-
Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇa
- MS :
-
Maitrāyaṇī Saṃhitā
- TB :
-
Taittirīya Brāhmaṇa
- RV :
-
Ṛgveda Saṃhitā
- RJ :
-
Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa; Ṛgvedic recension
- YJ :
-
Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa; Yajurvedic recension
References
Abhyanker, (1991). Misidentification of some Indian nakṣatrās. Indian Journal of History of Science, 26, 1–10.
Burgess, E. (1935). Translation of Sūrya-Siddhānta. In P. Gangooly (Ed.), A Text-book of Hindu Astronomy with Notes and Appendix (pp. 202–254). Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
Dikshit, S. B. (1969). Bharatiya Jyotish Sastra, (tr. R.V. Vaidya) (pp. 69–70). Calcutta: Government of India Press.
Gondhalekar, P. (2013). The Time Keepers of the Vedas (pp. 210–211). New Delhi: Manohar Publishers & Distributors.
Hunger, H., & Pingree, D. (1989). “MULAPIN: An Astronomical Compendium in Cuneiform”, Archiv für Orientforschung 24 (pp. 10–11). Austria: F. Berger.
Keith, A. B. (1920). Rigveda Brahmanas, the Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda (p. 453). London: Harvard Oriental Series 25. (Reprinted 1998. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
Krisciunas, K., & Schaefer, B. E. (1991). A model of the brightness of moonlight. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 103(667), 1033.
Kuppanna Sastry, T. S. (1984). In K. V. Sarma (Ed.), Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa of Lagadha. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.
Narahari Achar, B. N. (2000). A case for revising the date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa. Indian Journal of History of Science, 35(3), 173–183.
Pingree, D. (1970–1980). History of mathematical astronomy in India. In C. Coulston (Ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography (p. 533). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Pingree, D. (1973). The Mesopotamian origin of early Indian mathematical astronomy. Journal of History of Astronomy, 4, 1–12.
Schaefer, B. E. (1985). Predicting heliacal rising and setting. Sky & Telescope, 70(3), 261–263.
Subbarayappa, B. V., & Sarma, K. V. (1985). Indian Astronomy: A Source Book (Section 12). Bombay: Nehru Centre.
Acknowledgements
This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This analysis has also used data obtained via HORIZONS Web-Interface, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA. I would like to thank Patrick Wallace (of TPOINT SOFTWARE) for the Positional Astronomy Software SLALIB, used in this analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gondhalekar, P. Could the “case for Revising the Date of Vedāṅga Jyotiṣa” be flawed?. Indian J Hist. Sci. 56, 14–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-021-00001-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-021-00001-5