Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conflicts in multi-level governance: an analysis of international climate policy implementation at the sub-national level

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Global Public Policy and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity and multi-level nature of climate change requires governance systems able to manage and resolve conflicts across multiple scales. Drawing on the theories of collaborative governance and conflict resolution, this paper proposes a theoretical framework to understand three types of conflicts likely to occur in a multi-level governance (MLG) network: conflict in problem framing, conflict in benefit sharing, and conflict in capacity building. Using the implementation of the clean development mechanism in China as a case study, the paper finds the three types of conflicts emerged between supranational and subnational levels. The finding further indicates the role that the Chinese national government played in resolving conflicts through reinterpreting international norms, aligning presumably conflicting goals, eliminating the difference in benefits sharing, and narrowing capacity gaps across levels. The evidence suggests an improved MLG should be dedicated to integrating local level interests in centrally dominated policy processes. This study contributes new knowledge on MLG by investigating the hierarchical relations among participants and how authority and power differentials can shape their interactions across levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., Broadgate, W., Chen, C. T. A., Dube, O. P., et al. (2016). Down to earth: contextualizing the anthropocene. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P. (1974). Social conflict: readings in rule structures and conflict relationships. D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. J., Cornes, R. C., & Silva, E. C. D. (2003). An “ideal kyoto protocol”: emissions trading, redistributive transfers and global participation. Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), 216–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDM. (2021). CDM Methodologies. https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/index.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2021.

  • CDM China. (2007). Meeting files of CDM experience exchanging conference on Jan 22–23. http://cdm-en.ccchina.org.cn/Detail.aspx?newsId=5762&TId=39. Accessed 23 July 2021.

  • CDM Fund. (2018). Environmental and social risk management handbook. http://en.cdmfund.org/u/cms/English/201802/07173421q37e.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2021.

  • China Daily. (2012). Half of China’s CDM projects face default in global carbon market downturn. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/zgrbjx/2012-02/09/content_14563937.htm. Accessed 26 Oct 2021.

  • Chrislip, D. D. (2002). Collaborative Leadership Fieldbook. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Special issue on public integrative leadership: Multiple turns of the kaleidoscope. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 205–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2009). The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: an analysis of three countries. Habitat International, 33(3), 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., et al. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 54, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regime. Public management and change series. Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, D., & Streck, C. (2009). Legal aspects of carbon trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen, and beyond. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J., & Alstine, J. V. (2017). Can national policy blockages accelerate the development of polycentric governance? Evidence from climate change policy in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 45, 174–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., de Moel, H., & van der Leeuw, K. (2007). Climate change: a glocal problem requiring glocal action. Environmental Sciences, 4(3), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, D., Young, O., Jing, Y., Bramble, B., Bu, M., Chen, C., et al. (2018). Environmental governance in China: interactions between the state and “nonstate actors.” Journal of Environmental Management, 220, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz, J. (2008). The multisectoral trilemma of network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoornbeek, J. A., & Peters, B. G. (2017). Understanding policy problems: a refinement of past work. Policy and Society, 36(3), 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2019). Multi-level governance: explaining the “climate-focused” behavior of Chinese exporting companies. Public Policy and Administration, 34(2), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishtiaque, A., Eakin, H., Vij, S., Chhetri, N., Rahman, F., & Huq, S. (2021). Multilevel governance in climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: structure, processes, and power dynamics. Regional Environmental Change, 21(3), 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachson, D. & Coninck, S. D. (2019). How supporting climate action on a local level can transform the world. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/local-climate-change-adaptation-good-governance-authorities-undp/. Accessed 16 May 2021.

  • Jing, Y., & Li, D. (2019). Private roles in enhancing multi-level governance: China’s “Internet + ” national strategy. Public Policy and Administration, 34(2), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, Y., Torenvlied, R., van Gerven, M.M.-L., & Cao, J. (2021). Nonprofit contracting and partnership in elderly care: a comparison between china and the Netherlands. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hilden, M., Asselt, H. V., Rayner, T., Schoenefeld, J. J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks a network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kousky, C., & Schneider, S. H. (2003). Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Climate Policy, 3, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Z. (1997). A conflict resolution approach to public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D. Y. C., & Yang, Y. (2012). Wind energy development and its environmental impact: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 1031–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K. (2021). Deconcentrated global governance, transnational administration, and the public administration discipline. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(2), 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). (2011). Measures for the operation and management of clean development mechanism projects (in Chinese). http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/att/att/site1/20110922/001e3741a2cc0fe52cf402.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2020.

  • Ongaro, E., Gong, T., & Jing, Y. (2019). Toward multi-level governance in China? Coping with complex public affairs across jurisdictions and organizations. Public Policy and Administration, 34(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto-Zimmermann, K. (2011). Global environmental governance: the role of local governments. http://rio20.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Pardee_Center_SD_insight_GEG_and_the_role_of_Local_Governments_by_Konrad_Otto-Zimmermann.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2018). Coping with value conflicts in interorganizational collaborations. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(4), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatak, J., Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., & Johnston, J. (2018). Managing goal conflict in public service delivery networks: does accountability move up and down, or side to side? Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 152–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2014). Boundaries as junctures: collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seres, S., Haites, E., & Murphy, K. (2009). Analysis of technology transfer in CDM projects: an update. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4919–4926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. (2010). The domestic side of the clean development mechanism: the case of China. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, M. K., & Bhaduri, S. (2019). Market-based mechanism and ‘climate justice’: reframing the debate for a way forward. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(4–5), 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance the changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty years of multi-level governance: Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: the clean development mechanism. Journal of Environment and Development, 13(3), 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter-Minassian, T. (2020). Local public finance and capacity building in Asia: issues and challenges. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/c02dc03d-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/c02dc03d-en. Accessed 2 July 2021.

  • Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. (2006). Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, E., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2002). Institutional networks for inclusive coastal management in Trinidad and Tobago. Environment and Planning A, 34(6), 1095–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torvanger, A., Shrivastava, M. K., Pandey, N., & Tørnblad, S. H. (2013). A two-track CDM: improved incentives for sustainable development and offset production. Climate Policy, 13(4), 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underdal, A. (2010). Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 20(3), 386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2006). Guidelines for completing the project design document (CDM-PDD), and the proposed new baseline and monitoring methodologies (CDM-NM), version 05, CDM-Executive Board, Bonn, https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents/Guidel_Pdd_most_recent/English/Guidelines_CDMPDD_NM.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2021.

  • United Nations (UN). (2020). CDM methodology booklet (12th edition). https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/documentation/2103/CDM-Methodology-Booklet_fullversion.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2021.

  • Van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. (2008). Decisions as dynamic equilibriums in erratic policy processes. Public Management Review, 10(3), 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Popering-Verkerk, J., Teisman, G., & van Buuren, A. (2015). Synchronising climate adaptation processes in a multilevel governance setting: exploring synchronisation of governance levels in the Dutch Delta. Policy and Politics, 43(4), 579–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. S., Rosendo, S., Sadasing, O., & Celliers, L. (2020). Identifying local governance capacity needs for enabling climate change adaptation in Mauritius. Climate Policy, 20(5), 548–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. & Zhang, Y. (2021). Has the international climate regime promoted climate justice? Evidence from clean development mechanism projects. Climate Policy.

  • Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2004). The international climate change regime: a guide to rules, institutions and procedures. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Du, Z., Cheng, C., & Shen, P. (2021). Building a compound and collaborative governance framework to improve international space sustainability. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(2), 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2006). Vertical Interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2021). Can practitioners and analysts join forces to address largescale environmental challenges? Global Public Policy and Governance, 1, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Global Public Policy, LSE-Fudan Research Centre for Global Public Policy, Fudan University, 803C West Sub-Building of Guanghua Towers, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai, 200433, China

    Jingyuan Xu

Authors
  1. Jingyuan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingyuan Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, J. Conflicts in multi-level governance: an analysis of international climate policy implementation at the sub-national level. GPPG 1, 401–420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00029-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation