Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The last decade has seen a large increase in rotator cuff surgery and arthroscopic surgery. We were asked to define the relevance of open rotator cuff repair in 2021.

Purpose

To define whether there are proven advantages to arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repair surgery.

Method

We reviewed the recent literature regarding recent trends, anaesthetic time, rehabilitation, post-operative pain, complications, economic considerations, the learning curve and outcomes. We outlined the senior authors’ technique preferences, rationale and patient reported outcomes.

Results

There is no clear evidence of proven advantage in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair compared to open rotator cuff repairs, with regard to outcomes or the other aspects reviewed. There were no differences in the outcomes of arthroscopic and open repairs in the senior authors practice with his procedure indications.

Conclusions

Open rotator cuff repair surgery remains a valid option and has some appeal in specific indications and in settings where arthroscopic resources are limited. We believe surgeons should learn both techniques and the principles of good patient selection, tissue handling, and fixation techniques are of paramount importance in both arthroscopic and open rotator cuff surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Reproduced with permission from The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017 [1])

Fig. 2

(Reproduced with permission from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2019 [4])

Fig. 3

(Reproduced with permission from The PLOS One Journal, 2012 [23])

Fig. 4

(Reproduced with permission from The Bone and Joint Journal, 2017 [9])

Fig. 5

(Reproduced with permission from The ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2018 [5])

Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen, A. R., Cha, P. S., Devana, S. K., et al. (2017). Evaluation of the trends, concomitant procedures, and complications with open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in the medicare population. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine., 5(10), 2325967117731310. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117731310 (Published 2017 Oct 12).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Day, M. A., Westermann, R. W., Bedard, N. A., Glass, N. A., & Wolf, B. R. (2019). Trends associated with open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. HSS Journal, 15(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9628-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iyengar, J. J., Samagh, S. P., Schairer, W., Singh, G., Valone, F. H., 3rd., & Feeley, B. T. (2014). Current trends in rotator cuff repair: Surgical technique, setting, and cost. Arthroscopy, 30(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Austin, D. C., Torchia, M. T., Lurie, J. D., Jevsevar, D. S., & Bell, J. E. (2019). Mapping the diffusion of technology in orthopaedic surgery: Understanding the spread of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the United States. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(11), 2399–2410. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, E. C., Hunt, L., Brick, M. J., et al. (2018). Arthroscopic, open and mini-open approach for rotator cuff repair: No difference in pain or function at 24 months. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 88(1–2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Day, M., Westermann, R., Duchman, K., et al. (2018). Comparison of short-term complications after rotator cuff repair: Open versus arthroscopic. Arthroscopy, 34(4), 1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr, A. J., Cooper, C. D., Campbell, M. K., et al. (2015). Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial]. Health Technology Assessment, 19(80), 1–218. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pham, T. T., Bayle Iniguez, X., Mansat, P., Maubisson, L., & Bonnevialle, N. (2016). Postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair. A prospective study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 102(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carr, A., Cooper, C., Campbell, M. K., et al. (2017). Effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (UKUFF): A randomised controlled trial. The Bone & Joint Journal, 99-B(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0424.R1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, G., Jr., Kraeutler, M. J., Zmistowski, B., & Fenlin, J. M., Jr. (2014). No difference in postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 472(9), 2759–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3715-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kasten, P., Keil, C., Grieser, T., Raiss, P., Streich, N., & Loew, M. (2011). Prospective randomised comparison of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus tendon. International Orthopaedics, 35(11), 1663–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1262-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Owens, B. D., Williams, A. E., & Wolf, J. M. (2015). Risk factors for surgical complications in rotator cuff repair in a veteran population. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 24(11), 1707–1712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nolan, M. B., Martin, D. P., Thompson, R., Schroeder, D. R., Hanson, A. C., & Warner, D. O. (2017). Association between smoking status, preoperative exhaled carbon monoxide levels, and postoperative surgical site infection in patients undergoing elective surgery [published correction appears in JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):508]. JAMA Surgery, 152(5), 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thelwall, S., Harrington, P., Sheridan, E., & Lamagni, T. (2015). Impact of obesity on the risk of wound infection following surgery: Results from a nationwide prospective multicentre cohort study in England. Clinical Microbiology & Infection, 21(11), 1008.e1–1008.e10088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.07.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bayle, X., Pham, T. T., Faruch, M., Gobet, A., Mansat, P., & Bonnevialle, N. (2017). No difference in outcome for open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prospective comparative trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 137(12), 1707–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2796-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho, N. S., Cha, S. W., & Rhee, Y. G. (2015). Alterations of the deltoid muscle after open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(12), 2927–2934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515603063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Castro Veado, M. A., Castilho, R. S., Maia, P. E., & Rodrigues, A. U. (2015). Prospective and comparative study on functional outcomes after open and arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 46(5), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30410-9 (Published 2015 Dec 6).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Busfield, B. T., & Romero, D. M. (2009). Pain pump use after shoulder arthroscopy as a cause of glenohumeral chondrolysis. Arthroscopy, 25(6), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adla, D. N., Rowsell, M., & Pandey, R. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 19(2), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Churchill, R. S., & Ghorai, J. K. (2010). Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 19(5), 716–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of Aeronautical Science, 3, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopper, A. N., Jamison, M. H., & Lewis, W. G. (2007). Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 83(986), 777–779. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cook, J. A., Ramsay, C. R., Carr, A. J., Rees, J. L., & UKUFF Trial Group. (2012). A questionnaire elicitation of surgeons’ belief about learning within a surgical trial. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e49178. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gil, J. A., & Owens, B. D. (2018). Editorial Commentary: Don’t throw away the retractors: Complications of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair could be influenced by indications. Arthroscopy, 34(4), 1137–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Neviaser, A. S., Charen, D. A., Cotter, J. M., Harrison, A. K., Cagle, P. J., & Flatow, E. L. (2020). Retrospective review of open and arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis involvement: A single surgeon’s experience. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(5), 893–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murphy, J., Gray, A., Cooper, C., Cooper, D., Ramsay, C., & Carr, A. (2016). Costs, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic and open repair for rotator cuff tears: An economic evaluation alongside the UKUFF trial. The Bone & Joint Journal, 98(12), 1648–1655. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0121.R1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lucena, T. R., Lam, P. H., Millar, N. L., & Murrell, G. A. (2015). The temporal outcomes of open versus arthroscopic knotted and knotless rotator cuff repair over 5 years. Shoulder & Elbow, 7(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573215581775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid D. Mohammed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

All patients who generated prospectively collected outcome data has given informed consent for it to be presented in this scientific journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed, K.D., Lloyd, R.F.W., Nagaraj, C. et al. The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021. JOIO 55, 433–442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00345-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00345-7

Keywords

Navigation