Skip to main content
Log in

Total Hip Arthroplasty Digital Templating: Size Predicting Ability and Interobserver Variability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

During the last century, total hip arthroplasties have become more popular. They have had a huge impact on the quality of life, pain, range of motion, social interaction, and psychological well-being. A number of studies have emphasized the importance of using templates to choose the appropriate implant size when planning the surgery. Our aim is to use MediCad® software to analyze the ability of the digital template system MediCad® to predict the size of the implant needed in total hip arthroplasties.

Materials and Methods

An arthroplasty preoperative plan was created according to the MediCad® software guidelines, on anteroposterior hip X-ray by one junior resident, one senior resident, and three experienced hip surgeons.

Results

The median size accuracy was 0.7 (range: 0.27–0.87) for the cup, 0.73 (range: 0.36–0.83) for the stem, and 0.28 (range: −0.14–0.69) for the neck. Interobserver reliability was good (kappa > 0.4) and stronger when measuring the stem than when doing so with the cup. Conclusion: Digital preoperative total hip arthroplasty planning is a good method for predicting component size, restoring hip anatomy (vertical offset and horizontal offset), with good interobserver reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., Lee, I. M., et al. (2011). American college of sports medicine position stand Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Medical Science Sports Exercise, 43, 1334–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laupacis, A., Bourne, R., Rorabeck, C., Feeny, D., Wong, C., Tugwell, P., et al. (1993). The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. Journal Bone Joint surgery American Volume, 75, 1619–1626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallart, X., Daccach, J. J., Fernández-Valencia, J. A., García, S., Bori, G., Rios, J., et al. (2012). Study of the consistency of a system for preoperative planning digital in total arthroplasty of the hip. Revista Española Cirugía Ortopédica Traumatología, 56, 471–477.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Conn, K. S., Clarke, M. T., & Hallett, J. P. (2002). A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint surgery British Volume, 84, 269–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gamble, P., de Beer, J., Petruccelli, D., & Winemaker, M. (2010). The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Journal Arthroplasty, 25, 529–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strøm, N. J., & Reikerås, O. (2018). Templating in uncemented THA. On accuracy and postoperative leg length discrepancy. Journal Orthopaedic, 15, 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaarani, S. R., McHugh, G., & Collins, D. A. (2013). Accuracy of digital preoperative templating in 100 consecutive uncemented total hip arthroplasties: a single surgeon series. Journal Arthroplasty, 28, 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Widmer, K. H. (2004). A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. Journal Arthroplasty, 19, 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kummer, F. J., Shah, S., Iyer, S., & DiCesare, P. E. (1999). The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. Journal Arthroplasty, 14, 509–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, S. E. (2005). Radiography of the hip: lines, signs, and patterns of disease. Seminars Roentgenol, 40, 290–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blumentritt, S. (1988). Biomechanical construction principles of the human hip joint in frontal plane. Gegenbaurs morphologisches, 134, 221–240.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eschweiler, J., Fieten, L., Dell’Anna, J., Kabir, K., Gravius, S., Tingart, M., et al. (2012). Application and evaluation of biomechanical models and scores for the planning of total hip arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 226, 955–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bono, J. V. (2004). Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Journal Bone Joint Surgery American, 86, 118–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lecerf, G., Fessy, M. H., Philippot, R., Massin, P., Giraud, F., Flecher, X., et al. (2009). Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthopaedics Traumatology Surgery Research, 95, 210–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horneij, E., Holmströms, E., Hemborg, B., Isberg, P.-E., & Ekdahl, C. (2002). Interrater reliability and between-days repeatability of light physical performance test. Advances Physiotherapy, 4, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bangdiwala, S. I., & Shankar, V. (2013). The agreement chart. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackley, H. R., Howell, G. E., & Rorabeck, C. H. (2000). Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instructional Course Lectures, 49, 3–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiffers, N., Schkommodau, E., Portheine, F., Radermacher, K., & Staudte, H. W. (2000). Planning and performance of orthopedic surgery with the help of individual templates. orthopaedica, 29, 636–640.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosashvili, Y., Shasha, N., Olschewski, E., Safir, O., White, L., Gross, A., et al. (2009). Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Canadian Journal Surgery, 52, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knight, J. L., & Atwater, R. D. (1992). Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. Journal Arthroplasty, 7(1), 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haddad, F. S., Masri, B. A., Garbuz, D. S., & Duncan, C. P. (1999). The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 30, 191–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cech, O., Fassbender, M., Kirschner, P., & Rozkydal, Z. (2002). Preoperative planning and surgical technic in achieving stability and leg length equality in total hip joint arthroplasty. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 69, 362–368.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eggli, S., Pisan, M., & Müller, M. E. (1998). The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 80, 382–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Michalíková, M., Bednarčíková, L., Petrík, M., Živčák, J., & RašI, R. (2010). The digital pre-operative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 7, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein, W. M., Gordon, A., & Branson, J. J. (2005). Leg length inequality in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 28, s1037–s1040.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodman, S. B., Huene, D. S., & Imrie, S. (1992). Preoperative templating for the equalization of leg lengths in total hip arthroplasty. Contemporary Orthopaedics, 24, 703–710.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindgren, J. U., & Rysavy, J. (1992). Restoration of femoral offset during hip replacement. A radiographic cadaver study. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 63, 407–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubash, H. E., & Parvataneni, H. K. (2007). The pants too short, the leg too long: leg length inequality after THA. Orthopedics, 30, 764–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmalzried, T. P. (2005). Preoperative templating and biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, 28, s849–s851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suh, K. T., Cheon, S. J., & Kim, D. W. (2004). Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 75, 40–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Crooijmans, H. J., Laumen, A. M., van Pul, C., & van Mourik, J. B. (2009). A new digital preoperative planning method for total hip arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 467, 909–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Müller, M. E. (1992). Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 274, 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haddad, F. S., Masri, B. A., Garbuz, D. S., & Duncan, C. P. (2000). Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instructional Course Lectures, 49, 83–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jenkins, P. J., Clement, N. D., Hamilton, D. F., Gaston, P., Patton, J. T., Howie, C. R., et al. (2013). Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: A health economic analysis. Bone Joint Journal, 95, 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Daigle, M. E., Weinstein, A. M., Katz, J. N., & Losina, E. (2012). The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 26, 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iorio, R., Siegel, J., Specht, L. M., Tilzey, J. F., Hartman, A., Healy, W. L., et al. (2009). A comparison of acetate vs. digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: Is digital templating accurate and safe. Journal Arthroplasty, 24, 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bertz, A., Indrekvam, K., Ahmed, M., Englund, E., & Sayed-Noor, A. S. (2012). Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system. Skeletal Radiology, 41, 1245–1249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Efe, T., El Zayat, B. F., Heyse, T. J., Timmesfeld, N., Fuchs-Winkelmann, S., Schmitt, J., et al. (2011). Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 77, 616–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schmidutz, F., Steinbrück, A., Wanke-Jellinek, L., Pietschmann, M., Jansson, V., Fottner, A., et al. (2012). The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics, 36, 1767–1772.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Si, H. B., Zeng, Y., Cao, F., Pei, F. X., & Shen, B. (2015). Accuracy of a simple digital templating in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, 30, 150–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong, N., Yang, C., Li, S. Q., Gao, Y. H., Liu, J. G., & Qi, X. (2017). A novel digital templating methodology for arthroplasty: experience from patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Hip International, 27, 82–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nil

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Montiel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Standard Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Patient Declaration Statement

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montiel, V., Troncoso, S., Valentí-Azcárate, A. et al. Total Hip Arthroplasty Digital Templating: Size Predicting Ability and Interobserver Variability. JOIO 54, 840–847 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00217-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00217-0

Keywords

Navigation