Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Infographics Within Medical Information Response Letters

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In a continuing effort to provide innovative formats of presenting medical information in a digestible and comprehensive manner, infographics were created and included in select standard letters created by the Medical Information team.

Methods

Qualitative and quantitative feedback on the ease of comprehension, flow, layout, and value of infographics within Standard Response Documents (SRDs) was obtained from healthcare professionals (HCPs). A qualitative survey (n = 47) was conducted to assess the ease of comprehension and effectiveness of infographics. The qualitative market research consisted of 25 individual 60-min phone interviews with HCPs focused around two SRDs.

Results

It was found that 87% (n = 41) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the infographic was easy to comprehend. Additionally, 85% (n = 40) of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the infographic was useful in answering their product question. It was found that most HCPs (20/25) appreciated the presentation of the infographics and found them visually appealing. Additionally, most agreed that the infographic provided content that was sufficient in addressing their product inquiries and impactful for clinical decision making.

Conclusion

Infographics have proved to be a valuable resource within response letters to address HCP inquiries and provide an option to pharmaceutical companies to evolve the way medical information is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fung S, Chang D, Patel-Romero R, Suchodolski M. Survey of health care practitioners’ preferences for medical information. Therap Innov Regul Sci . 2016;50(5):569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buljan I, Malički M, Wager E, Puljak L, Hren D, Kellie F, West H, Alfirević Ž, Marušić A. No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crick K, Hartling L. Preferences of knowledge users for two formats of summarizing results from systematic reviews: infographics and critical appraisals. PLoS ONE. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Young J, Bridgeman M, Hermes-DeSantis E. Presentation of scientific poster information: Lessons learned from evaluating the impact of content arrangement and use of infographics. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(2):204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Absolutely Maybe. Infographic vs Text: Evidence Throwdown! | Absolutely Maybe. PLOS ONE BLOGS. https://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2017/12/31/infographic-vs-text-evidence-throwdown. Accessed April 21, 2019.

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Rearview Marketing Solutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zil Patel PharmD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, Z., Patel, C., Oreper, J. et al. Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Infographics Within Medical Information Response Letters. Ther Innov Regul Sci 54, 1382–1387 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00164-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00164-w

Keywords

Navigation