Abstract
Adenomyosis is associated with dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain; however, the triggering mechanisms of painful stimuli and the role of uterine nerve fibers in the manifestation of pain remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to systematically review the role of uterine nerve fibers’ presence and density in the occurrence of pain in patients with adenomyosis. An electronic search was performed using the Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane databases. We included all studies from inception to November 2023. A total of ten studies that compared uterine biopsies samples of women with and without adenomyosis were included. The biomarker antiprotein gene product 9.5 was decreased or absent in the endometrium of most included women with adenomyosis. None of the included studies observed a difference in neurofilament (NF) staining between the adenomyosis and non-adenomyosis groups. Studies that assessed nerve growth factor (NGF) staining were heterogeneous in design. One study reported no difference in immunohistochemistry staining in any endometrial layer between the adenomyosis and non-adenomyosis groups, while another reported increased staining in the adenomyosis functional endometrial layer, and a third study reported overexpression of NGF, synaptophysin (SYN), and microtubule-associated protein 2 mRNA in focal adenomyosis alone. Preliminary data from poor-quality studies suggest an increase in the uterine density of nerve fibers in patients with adenomyosis. Well-designed studies are essential to assess the cause-and-effect relationship between uterine nerve fibers and pain in patients with adenomyosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, MSA, upon request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Vercellini P, Ragni G, Trespidi L, Oldani S, Panazza S, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis: a déjà vu? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1993;48(12):789–94.
Gordts S, Grimbizis G, Campo R. Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):380-8.e1.
Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):389–97.
Vinci V, Saldari M, Sergi ME, Bernardo S, Rizzo G, Porpora MG, et al. MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis? Radiol Med. 2017;122(5):361–8.
Peric H, Fraser IS. The symptomatology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):547–55.
Taran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Phenotype and Surgical and Interventional Alternatives to Hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73(9):924–31.
Marques ALS, Andres MP, Mattos LA, Gonçalves MO, Baracat EC, Abrão MS. Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021;76:e2981.
Kissler S, Zangos S, Kohl J, Wiegratz I, Rody A, Gätje R, et al. Duration of dysmenorrhoea and extent of adenomyosis visualised by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137(2):204–9.
Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, Camilli S, Martire FG, Lazzeri L, et al. New Sonographic Classification of Adenomyosis: Do Type and Degree of Adenomyosis Correlate to Severity of Symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1308–15.
Chen Q, Li YW, Wang S, Fan QB, Shi HH, Leng JH, et al. Clinical Manifestations Of Adenomyosis Patients With Or Without Pain Symptoms. J Pain Res. 2019;12:3127–33.
Coxon L, Horne AW, Vincent K. Pathophysiology of endometriosis-associated pain: A review of pelvic and central nervous system mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:53–67.
Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S2-15.
Vannuccini S, Tosti C, Carmona F, Huang SJ, Chapron C, Guo SW, et al. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: an update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):592–601.
Zhang X, Lu B, Huang X, Xu H, Zhou C, Lin J. Innervation of endometrium and myometrium in women with painful adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):730–7.
Zhang X, Lu B, Huang X, Xu H, Zhou C, Lin J. Endometrial nerve fibers in women with endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1799–801.
Barcena de Arellano ML, Wagner MF, Oldeweme J, Arnold J, Ebert A, Schneider A, et al. Neurotrophin expression is not affected in uteri of women with adenomyosis. J Mol Neurosci. 2012;47(3):495–504.
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.
Rohatgi A. WebPlot digitizer. 4.6th ed. CA, USA; 2022. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer.
Carrarelli P, Yen CF, Funghi L, Arcuri F, Tosti C, Bifulco G, et al. Expression of Inflammatory and Neurogenic Mediators in Adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(3):369–75.
Barcena de Arellano ML, Arnold J, Lang H, Vercellino GF, Chiantera V, Schneider A, et al. Evidence of neurotrophic events due to peritoneal endometriotic lesions. Cytokine. 2013;62(2):253–61.
Choi YJ, Chang JA, Kim YA, Chang SH, Chun KC, Koh JW. Innervation in women with uterine myoma and adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58(2):150–6.
Quinn MJ, Kirk N. Differences in uterine innervation at hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1515–9 (discussion 9–20).
Quinn M. Uterine innervation in adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(3):287–91.
Yadav G, Rao M, Gothwal M, Singh P, Kathuria P, Sharma PP. Detection of nerve fibers in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis, uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021;64(5):454–61.
Li Y, Zou S, Xia X, Zhang S. Human Adenomyosis Endometrium Stromal Cells Secreting More Nerve Growth Factor: Impact and Effect. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1073–82.
Barcena de Arellano ML, Oldeweme J, Arnold J, Schneider A, Mechsner S. Remodeling of estrogen-dependent sympathetic nerve fibers seems to be disturbed in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):801–9.
Anaf V, El Nakadi I, De Moor V, Chapron C, Pistofidis G, Noel JC. Increased nerve density in deep infiltrating endometriotic nodules. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(2):112–7.
Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392–411.
Fauconnier A, Fritel X, Chapron C. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009;37(1):57–69.
Chronic Pelvic Pain. ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 218. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):744–6.
Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(11):666–82.
Anaf V, Chapron C, El Nakadi I, De Moor V, Simonart T, Noël JC. Pain, mast cells, and nerves in peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1336–43.
Anaf V, Simon P, El Nakadi I, Fayt I, Buxant F, Simonart T, et al. Relationship between endometriotic foci and nerves in rectovaginal endometriotic nodules. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(8):1744–50.
Quinn M, Armstrong G. Uterine nerve fibre proliferation in advanced endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(8):932–3.
Stratton P, Berkley KJ. Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(3):327–46.
Orellana R, García-Solares J, Donnez J, van Kerk O, Dolmans MM, Donnez O. Important role of collective cell migration and nerve fiber density in the development of deep nodular endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):987-95.e5.
Tokushige N, Markham R, Russell P, Fraser IS. High density of small nerve fibres in the functional layer of the endometrium in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):782–7.
Medina MG, Lebovic DI. Endometriosis-associated nerve fibers and pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(9):968–75.
Giray B, Esim-Buyukbayrak E, Hallac-Keser S, Karageyim-Karsidag AY, Turkgeldi A. Comparison of Nerve Fiber Density between Patients with Uterine Leiomyoma with and without Pain: a Prospective Clinical Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78(4):407–11.
Atwal G, du Plessis D, Armstrong G, Slade R, Quinn M. Uterine innervation after hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain with, and without, endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1650–5.
Zheng P, Zhang W, Leng J, Lang J. Research on central sensitization of endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review of the literature. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1447–56.
McNamara HC, Frawley HC, Donoghue JF, Readman E, Healey M, Ellett L, et al. Peripheral, Central, and Cross Sensitization in Endometriosis-Associated Pain and Comorbid Pain Syndromes. Front Reprod Health. 2021;3:729642.
Vercellini P, Buggio L, Borghi A, Monti E, Gattei U, Frattaruolo MP. Medical treatment in the management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum and sigmoid colon: a comprehensive literature review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(8):942–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13328.
Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, Sorbi F, Petraglia F. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):398–405.
Kishi Y, Shimada K, Fujii T, Uchiyama T, Yoshimoto C, Konishi N, et al. Phenotypic characterization of adenomyosis occurring at the inner and outer myometrium. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0189522.
Rocha TP, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Abrão MS. Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Adenomyosis in Patients With Infertility: A Systematic Review of Current Options. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(4):480–6.
Dong QJ, Duan H, Zheng DX, Shen X, Wang S. Degree of fibrosis of adenomyotic myometrium and its relationship with dysmenorrhea. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;53(10):689–93.
Kobayashi H, Kishi Y, Matsubara S. Mechanisms Underlying Adenomyosis-Related Fibrogenesis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(1):1–12.
Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):114.e1-7.
Acknowledgements
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Systematic reviews are pre-approved at the Internal Review Board (IRB) of the Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa of São Paulo.
Consent to Participate
Does not apply.
Consent for Publication
All authors have given consent for publication.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This manuscript has not been submitted for publication elsewhere.
All authors have contributed significantly towards the manuscript completion.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
da Cunha Vieira, M., Andres, M.P., Riccio, L.G.C. et al. Association of Uterine Tissue Innervation and Peripheral Nerve Density with Adenomyosis Related Pain. A Systematic Review. Reprod. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01587-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01587-8