Skip to main content
Log in

Changing the Narrative, Starting With Us

  • Infertility: Perspective, Opinions and Commentaries
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infertility can affect anyone, including Black women who, contrary to popular belief, are most likely to suffer from infertility, less likely to seek fertility care, and more likely to delay or completely forgo fertility treatment (Chin et al Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 29(5):416-25, 5). These trends are likely fueled by deep-rooted stigma generated from a multitude of origins. Some black women may feel uncomfortable discussing their experience with infertility due to the pervasive stereotype that Black women are hyper-fertile (Ceballo et al Psychol Women Q 39(4):497–511, 20). This stereotype also has important implications within the medical field, in which provider implicit bias may affect referrals and treatment plans, further contributing to stratified reproduction (Chapman et al J Gen Intern Med 28(11):1504-10, 15, FitzGerald and Hurst BMC Med Ethics 18(1):19, 16). It is time for the medical community to shift our focus to what we can change, starting with how we perceive the narrative. In order to effect change, providers should first become and remain aware of racial/ethnic disparities within reproduction. We can make a concerted effort to effectively counsel Black women about their fertility and future childbearing goals, as well as strive to debunk false racial/ethnic fertility stereotypes with medical evidence. We should actively work to understand our biases, where they stem from, and how to resolve them. We must aim to always provide respectful, equitable, and consistent care, especially when deciding how to counsel someone regarding fertility preservation and infertility treatment options. In sum, we can approach solving this complicated racial-ethnic gap in health equity by taking small intentional and parallel steps, starting now.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and material are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hawkins J. Selling Art: An Empirical Assessment of Advertising on Fertility Clinics’ Websites. Indiana Law J. 2013; 88(1147).

  2. Missmer SA, Seifer DB, Jain T. Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):1943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra A, Copen C, Stephen E. Infertility Service Use in the United States: Data From the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. 2014.

  4. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2013; (67): 1-18, 1 p following 19.

  5. Chin HB, Howards PP, Kramer MR, Mertens AC, Spencer JB. Racial disparities in seeking care for help getting pregnant. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(5):416–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen AB, et al. One size does not fit all: variations by ethnicity in demographic characteristics of men seeking fertility treatment across North America. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seifer, DB, Sharara, FI, Jain, T. Toward a better understanding of racial disparities in utilization and outcomes of IVF treatment in the USA. In: Sharara F, editor. Ethnic differences in fertility and assisted reproduction. New York: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7548-4_19.

  8. Wiltshire A, Brayboy L, Phillips K, et al. Infertility knowledge and treatment beliefs among African American women in an urban community. Contracept Reprod Med. 2019;4:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-019-0097-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis D-A. Reproductive Injustice: Racism, Pregnancy, and Premature Birth (Anthropologies of American Medicine: Culture, Power, and Practice, 7. 2019: NYU Press.

  10. Brinkman BG, Garth J, Horowitz KR, Marino S, Lockwood KN. Black girls and sexuality education: access. Equity. Justice. Black Girls Equity Alliance (BGEA); 2020. https://www.gwensgirls.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/BGEA-Report2_v4.pdf.

  11. Harper KC. The ethos of black motherhood in America : only white women get pregnant. Lexington studies in health communication. 2020, Lanham: Lexington Books. pages cm.

  12. Higgins JA, Kramer RD, Ryder KM. Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: perceptions of young adult women. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(11):1932–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kramer RD, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in patterns of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in the United States, 2011–2015. Contraception. 2018;97(5):399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dehlendorf C, et al. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):214–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapman EN, Kaatz A, Carnes M. Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(11):1504–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenfield G, Foley K, Majeed A. Rethinking primary care’s gatekeeper role. BMJ. 2016;354:i4803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Inhorn MC. Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020;10:46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirubarajan A, Patel P, Leung S, Prethipan T, Sierra S. Barriers to fertility care for racial/ethnic minority groups: a qualitative systematic review. 2021; 2(2): 10.

  20. Ceballo R, Graham ET, Hart J. Silent and infertile: an intersectional analysis of the experiences of socioeconomically diverse African American women with infertility. Psychol Women Q. 2015;39(4):497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315581169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Humphries LA, Chang O, Humm K, Sakkas D, Hacker MR. Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):212.e1–212.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson-Bey T, Morris J, Jasper E, Edwards D, Thornton K, Richard-Davis G. Plowden T, Systematic review of racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive endocrinology and infertility: where do we stand today? F&S Reviews. 2021;2:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wellons MF, et al. Racial differences in self-reported infertility and risk factors for infertility in a cohort of black and white women: the CARDIA Women’s Study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1640–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiltshire A, Ghidei L, Brayboy LM. Infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in Afro-Caribbean women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(7):1553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiltshire A, et al. To treat or not to treat: perceptions of the initial American Society for Reproductive Medicine COVID-19 recommendations among women’s health providers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(3):621–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tierney K. Is there evidence of weathering among women seeking fertility treatments?: Evidence and insights. Soc Sci Med. 2020;247:112816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghidei L, Wiltshire A, Raker C, Ayyar A, Brayboy LM. Factors associated with disparate outcomes among Black women undergoing in vitro fertilization F&S Reports, 2021.

  28. RESOLVE. The National Infertility Association. [cited 2021 Dec 9 2021]; Available from: www.resolve.org.

  29. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, a.a.o., Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(1): 54-63.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors accept responsibility for the content of this manuscript and approve submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luwam Ghidei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors consent to the publication of this work.

Competing Interests

The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiltshire, A., Jackman, J.M., Moreta, L. et al. Changing the Narrative, Starting With Us . Reprod. Sci. 29, 2067–2070 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00915-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00915-0

Keywords

Navigation