Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Energy-Efficient Mobile Node in Multicast Batch Verification

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 28 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Conventional methods used in batch signature verification do not distinguish between static node signature verification and mobile node signature verification. Static nodes rarely face energy expenditure problem, but energy conservation is given a critical importance in mobile nodes. In this paper, we propose a new scheme for energy conservation at mobile receiver. Mobile receiver requests sender to modify the batch size based on the available energy at the receiver; when energy at the mobile receiver has reached particular threshold1, then sender is informed to reduce the batch size to half of the original batch size, which decreases the energy utilized by the mobile receiver for batch signature verification. When the energy at the mobile receiver has reached threshold2, then sender is informed to stop batch transmission till further request from mobile receiver for batch transmission of new batch size; this reduces packet loss which occurs when batches do not reach mobile receiver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Deering SE. Multicast routing in internetworks and extended LANs. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM symposium on communications architectures and protocols; 1988. p. 55–64.

  2. Ballardie T, Crowcroft J. Multicast-specific security threats and counter-measures. In: Proceedings second ANN network and distributed system security symposium (NDSS’95); 1995. p. 2–16.

  3. Judge P, Ammar M. Security issues and solutions in multicast content distribution: a survey. IEEE Netw Mag. 2003;17(1):30–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Challal Y, Bettahar H, Bouabdallah A. A taxonomy of multicast data origin authentication: issues and solutions. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2004;6(3):34–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Zhu X, Fang Y. MABS: multicast authentication based on batch signature. IEEE Trans Mob Comput. 2010;9(7):982–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin Y, Shieh S, Lin W. Lightweight, pollution-attack resistant multicast authentication scheme. In: Proceedings ACM symposium information, computer, and communication security (ASIACCS’06); 2006.

  7. Jeong J, Park Y, Cho Y. Efficient DoS resistant multicast authentication schemes. In: Proceedings Int’l conference computational science and its applications (ICCSA’05); 2005.

  8. Even S, Goldreich O, Micali S. On-line/offline digital signatures. J Cryptol. 1996;9:35–67.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rohatgi P. A compact and fast hybrid signature scheme for multicast packet. In: Sixth ACM conference on computer and communication security (CCS’99); 1999.

  10. Wong CK, Lam SS. Digital signatures for flows and multicasts. In: Proceedings sixth Int’l conference network protocols (ICNP’98); 1998. p. 198–209.

  11. Wong CK, Lam SS. Digital signatures for flows and multicasts. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw. 1999;7(4):502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gennaro R, Rohatgi P. How to sign digital streams. Inf Comput. 2001;165(1):100–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gennaro R, Rohatgi P. How to sign digital streams. In: Proceedings 17th ANN cryptology conference advances in cryptology (CRYPTO’97); 1997.

  14. Rivest RL, Shamir A, Adleman L. A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun ACM. 1978;21(2):120–6.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Harn L. Batch verifying multiple RSA digital signatures. IEEE Electron Lett. 1998;34(12):1219–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kalpataru Institute of Technology, Tiptur, Karnataka, India

    R. Jagadeesha

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, VTU PG Center, Mysore, Karnataka, India

    K. Thippeswamy

Authors
  1. R. Jagadeesha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Thippeswamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Thippeswamy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Advances in Computational Intelligence, Paradigms and Applications” guest edited by Young Lee and S. Meenakshi Sundaram.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jagadeesha, R., Thippeswamy, K. Energy-Efficient Mobile Node in Multicast Batch Verification. SN COMPUT. SCI. 1, 110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-0111-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-0111-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation