Skip to main content
Log in

The Minimum Number of Attempts for a Reliable Isometric Strength Test Score

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The maximal isometric strength test is widely used in general, athletic, and clinical populations. However, this test has often been used without considering how many trials are needed or appropriate to obtain reliable test scores. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the maximal isometric strength test in upper and lower body for the purpose of determining the reliability of best isometric strength score and the ideal number of trials for a reliable test score.

Methods

One hundred and twelve healthy adults were assigned to four different groups (elbow flexion with the vertical and horizontal forearm positions, knee flexion, and knee extension). After familiarization, all participants performed three maximal isometric voluntary contractions with the designated muscle group. The reliability of best isometric strength test score was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) from a one-way ANOVA model. The Spearman–Brown prophecy formula was used to identify the minimum number of trials needed.

Results

The reliability of the best maximal isometric strength test scores out of three trials were high (ICC = 0.92 to 0.98). At least two trials of maximal isometric strength test for knee flexion and one trial for elbow flexion and knee extension would be necessary to achieve an acceptable reliability coefficient of 0.80. In addition, one trial of elbow flexion would be enough for women, but men would need two trials.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that overall, at least two trials would be necessary to test isometric strength in upper and lower body muscles in both sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P. Strength and power assessment. Sports Med. 1995;19(6):401–17. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199519060-00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s health-related physical fitness assessment manual. 4th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgartner TA. Reliability and error of measurement. In: Wood TM, Zhu W, editors. Measurement theory and practice in kinesiology. 1st ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellar D, Marcus L, Judge LW. Validation and reliability of a novel test of upper body isometric strength. J Hum Kinet. 2015;47(1):189–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0074.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown W. Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities 1. Br J Psychol 1904–1920. 1910;3(3):296–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brzycki M. Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 1993;64(1):88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colombo R, Mazzini L, Mora G, Parenzan R, Creola G, Pirali I, Minuco G. Measurement of isometric muscle strength: a reproducibility study of maximal voluntary contraction in normal subjects and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Med Eng Phys. 2000;22(3):167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coombs R, Garbutt G. Developments in the use of the hamstring/quadriceps ratio for the assessment of muscle balance. J Sports Sci Med. 2002;1(3):56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bartels EM, Bülow PM, Lund H, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, Wätjen I, Appleyard M, Bliddal H. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Physiol. 2009;197(Suppl. 673):1–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Enoka RM. Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81(6):2339–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Enoka RM, Duchateau J. Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. J Physiol. 2008;586(1):11–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffith EE, Yoon T, Hunter SK. Age and load compliance alter time to task failure for a submaximal fatiguing contraction with the lower leg. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(6):1510–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter SK. Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses. Acta Physiol. 2014;210(4):768–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter SK. The relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(11):2247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaric S. Muscle strength testing. Sports Med. 2002;32(10):615–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Knapik JJ, Vogel JA, Wright JE. Measurement of isometric strength in an upright pull at 38 cm (No. USARIEM-T-3/81). US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA; 1981.

  18. Levoska S, Keinänen-Kiukanniemi S, Hämäläinen O, Jäms T, Vanharanta H. Reliability of a simple method of measuring isometric neck muscle force. Clin Biomech. 1992;7(1):33–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Loftice J, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of the elbow in sports. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23(4):519–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malliou P, Ispirlidis I, Beneka A, Taxildaris K, Godolias G. Vertical jump and knee extensors isokinetic performance in professional soccer players related to the phase of the training period. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2003;11(3):165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marcora S, Miller MK. The effect of knee angle on the external validity of isometric measures of lower body neuromuscular function. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(5):313–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison JB. The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking. J Biomech. 1970;3(1):51–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morrow JR Jr, Mood D, Disch J, Kang M. Measurement and evaluation in human performance. 5th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nyberg A, Saey D, Martin M, Maltais F. Test–re-test reliability of quadriceps muscle strength measures in people with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(8):759–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sardelli M, Tashjian RZ, MacWilliams BA. Functional elbow range of motion for contemporary tasks. J Bone Jt Surg. 2011;93(5):471–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI, Durandt JJ, Scales N, Noakes TD. Quadriceps and hamstrings peak torque ratio changes in persons with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(7):418–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. Washington: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Webber SC, Porter MM. Reliability of ankle isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic strength and power testing in older women. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1165–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants who took time out of their schedules to help with these projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunggun Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, S., Miller, W.M., Kang, M. et al. The Minimum Number of Attempts for a Reliable Isometric Strength Test Score. J. of SCI. IN SPORT AND EXERCISE 2, 89–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00035-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00035-3

Keywords

Navigation