Skip to main content
Log in

Decision Support System for the Maintenance Management of Road Network Considering Multi-Criteria

  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maintenance management of a large road network with limited resources is a challenging task in developing countries like India. Road agencies expect that the condition of their road infrastructure should always above the desired level of performance even under restricted resources. This requires an integrated decision support system considering all aspects of maintenance. In this paper, a framework for optimal maintenance decisions by multi-objective approach is formulated for a road network by considering functional condition of the pavement quantified in terms of roughness and structural condition quantified in terms of rebound deflection. A multiobjective optimization model is developed using Integer Linear Programming (ILP). A novel approach to track the age of pavement is applied in the formulation of the mathematical model. The ε-constraint method is adopted to generate non-dominated solutions. Budget bound optimizing model is formulated and implemented for a typical road network of four roads and optimal maintenance scheduling is arrived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Highways Authority of India, Annual Report, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways 2015–16,. (National Highways Authority of India Web, 2019), http://www.nhai.org/Audit.htm. Accessed 29 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Highways Authority of India, About NHAI. (National Highways Authority of India Web, 2019), https://nhai.gov.in/about-nhai.htm. Accessed 12 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.G. Peshkin, J. Hoerner, K.A. Zimmerman, Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Report 523. Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Yepes, C. Torres-Machi, A. Chamorro, E. Pellicer, Optimal pavement maintenance programs based on a hybrid Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure Algorithm, J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 22(4) (2016) 540–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Hussain, Pavement management based on a ranking method, Proc. First North American Pave. Manage. Conf., Toronto, Canada, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Veeraragavan, N. Chakraborty,Prioritization of pavement maintenance based on economic criteria, Proc. 1st European Pave. Manage. Syst. Conf., Budapest, Hungary, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Ouyang, S. Medanet, Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions, Transp. Res. Part A 38 (2004) 347–365.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.C.G. Haas, W.R. Hudson, Pavement Management Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Javed, Integrated prioritization and optimization approach for pavement management, (Doctoral Dissertation), National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Ahmed, P. Vedagiri, K.V.K. Rao, Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using objective based Analytic Hierarchy Process, Int. J. Pave. Res. Tech. 10(2) (2017) 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Wu, G.W. Flintsch, Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability, J. Transp. Eng. 135(5) (2009) 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Deckker, Application of maintenance optimization models: A review and analysis, Reliability Eng. Sys. Saf. 51(3) (1996) 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Kuhn, S. Madanat, Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Tech. 13(5–6) (2005) 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T.F. Fwa, W.T. Chan, K.Z. Hoque, Network level programming for pavement management using genetic algorithms, Proc. Fourth Inter. Conf. Manag. Pave., Toronto, Canada. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Ferreira, A. Antunes, L. Picadao-Santos, (2002), Probabilistic segment-linked pavement management optimization model, J. Transp. Eng. 128(6) (2002) 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Farhan, T.F. Fwa, A decentralized multidistrict optimization framework for system-wide pavement maintenance resource allocation, Int. J. Pave. Res. Tech. 9(3) (2016) 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Santos, A. Ferreira, G. A. Flintsch, Multi-objective optimization-based pavement management decision-support system for enhancing pavement sustainability, J. Clean. Prod. 164 (2017) 1380–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. Donev, M. Hoffman, Optimisation of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities, timing and work zones for short survey sections and multiple distress types, Int. J. Pavement Eng. (2018) 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Yeo, Y. Yoon, S. Madanat, Algorithms for bottom-up maintenance optimisation for heterogeneous infrastructure systems, Struct. Infrast. Eng. 9(4) (2013) 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Lee, S. A. Madanat, Joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction. Transp. Res. Part B 78 (2015) 106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. T. De Almeida, R. J. P. Ferreira, C. A. V. Cavalcante, A review of the use of multicriteria and multi-objective models in maintenance and reliability, IMA J. Manage. Math. 26(3) (2015) 249–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Ameri, A. Jarrahi, (2018). An executive model for network level pavement maintenance and rehabilitation planning based on Linear Integer Programming, J. Ind. Manage. Optim. (2018) 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Chowdhury, P. A Tan, Multi-Objective Decision-Making Framework for Transportation Investments, J. Transp. Res. Forum 43 (2004) 91–104. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/jtrf.43.1.731.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Meneses, A. Ferreira, Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements, Int. J. Pave. Eng. 16(7) (2015) 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Wu, G.W. Flintsch, A. Ferriera, L.P. Santos, Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability, J. Transp. Eng. 135(5) (2012) 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Wang, Z. Zhang, R. B. Machemehl, Decision-Making Problem for Managing Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Projects, Transp. Res. Rec. 1853 (2003) 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Gao, C. Xie, Z. Zhang, S.T. Waller, Network-level maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling for optimal performance improvement, Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 27(4) (2012) 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. L. Chen, A. Raith, T.F.P. Henning, Multi-Objective Optimisation in Decision Making of Road Maintenance, Proc. joint NZSA+ORSNZ Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 24–26 November 2014, pp. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Yu, X. Gu, F. Ni, R. Guo, Multi-objective optimization for asphalt pavement maintenance plans at project level: Integrating performance, cost and environment. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 41 (2015) 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Meneses, A. Ferira, A. Cillop, Multi-objective decision aid tool for pavement management, Proc. Institution Civ. Eng.-Transp. 166(2), 2013, pp. 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Meneses, A. Ferreira, Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: maintenance costs and user costs, Int. J. Pave. Eng. 14(2) (2013) 206–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Santos, A. Ferreira, G. Flintsch, V. Cerezo, A multi-objective optimisation approach for sustainable pavement management, Struct. Infras. Eng. 14(7) (2018) 854–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Torres Machi, A. Chamorro, V. Yepes, E. Pellicer, Current models and practices of economic and environmental evaluation for sustainable network-level pavement management, J. Const. 13(2) (2014) 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Bako, Decision supporting models for highway maintenance, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 1(1) (2004) 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B.B. Reddy, A. Veeraragavan, Structural performance of in-service flexible pavements, J. Transp. Eng. 123(2) (1997)156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Muralikrishna, A. Veeraragavan, Decision Support System for Performance Based Maintenance Management of Highway Pavements, J. Indian Road Congress 22(5) (2011) 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Veeraragavan, P. Muralikrishna, Decision Support Models for Asset Management of Low Volume Roads, Transp. Res. Rec. 2205 (2011) 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. N.W. Lister, Deflection criteria for flexible pavements and the design of overlays, Proc. Third Inter. Cenf. Struc. Des. Asphalt Pave., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Irfan, M.B. Khurshid, S. Labi, W. Flora, Evaluating the cost effectiveness of flexible rehabilitation treatment using different performance criteria, J. Transp. Eng. 135(10) (2009) 753–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakthivelan Ramachandran.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramachandran, S., Rajendran, C. & Amirthalingam, V. Decision Support System for the Maintenance Management of Road Network Considering Multi-Criteria. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12, 325–335 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0039-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0039-7

Keywords

Navigation