Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Analysis and Comparison for Various Excitation Source Salient Rotor with Modular Rotor Permanent Magnet of Flux Switching Machine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the large power/torque density and high efficiency of permanent magnet flux switching magnet (FSPM) are suitable for driving electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. In this paper, flux switching permanent magnet machine (PMFSM), field excitation flux switching machine (FEFSM) and hybrid excitation flux switching machine (HEFSM) with salient rotor topology is compared with modular rotor permanent magnet flux switching machine. On the condition of the same outer diameters, the electromagnetic performances of the machines are analyzed and compared by the two-dimensional (2D) finite element method including the flux density, back electromotive force (EMF), cogging torque, electromagnetic torque, and power. The finite element results show that the modular rotor permanent magnet flux switching machine has greater torque than salient rotor FEFSM, HEFSM, and PMFSM at the rated load with significantly less weight than the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Villani M (2016) “Induction machines, permanent magnet synchronous machines and others for cars and trucks – advantages and disadvantages of the types of machines,” In: Proceedings 7th international conference on magnetism and metallurgy(WMM’14), p. 1–8.

  2. Jahns T (2017) Getting rare-earth magnets out of EV traction machines: a review of the many approaches being pursued to minimize or eliminate rare earth magnets from future EV drive trains. IEEE Electrif Mag 5:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiba A, and Kiyota K (2015) “Review of research and development ofswitched reluctance motor for hybrid electrical vehicle”. Proceedings IEEE workshopon electrical machines design control and diagnosis, p 127–131

  4. Jurkovic S et al (2015) Induction machine design and analysis for general motors e-assistelectrification technology. IEEE Transact Industry Appl 51:631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ribberink H, and Evgueniy E (2013) “Electric vehicles - a one-size-fits-allsolution for emission reduction from transportation.” IEEE world electricvehicle symposium and exhibition (EVS27). 1–7

  6. Jenal M et al (2016) A new switched flux machine employing alternate circumferential and radial flux alciraf permanentmagnet for lightweight EV. J Magn 21:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sulaiman E et al (2014) Design and analysis of highpower/high-torque density dual excitation switched-flux machine for tractiondrive in HEVs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirani M et al (2015) A review on recentapplications of brushless DC electric machines and their potential in energysaving. Energy Equip Syst 3:57–71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang M et al (2018) Design and analysisof rotor shapes for IPM motors in EV power traction platforms. Energies 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zulu A, et al (2010) “Topologies for wound-fieldthree-phase segmented-rotor flux-switching machines,” 5th IET international conference on power electronics, machines and drives. Brighton, UK, p.111–111

  11. Sulaiman E, et al (2012) “Design study and experimentalanalysis of wound field flux switching motor for HEV applications.” In: 25th IEEE international conference on electrical machines, p. 1269–1275.

  12. Sanabria-Walter C et al (2013) High-torque density high-efficiency flux-switching PM machine for aerospace applications. IEEE J Emerg Select Topics Power Electron 1:327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taha HM, Alnaab I (2019) Designs of PMSMs with inner and outer rotors for electric bicycle applications. Kurd J Appl Res 4:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hua W et al (2016) Investigation of a five-phase Ecore hybrid-excitation flux-switching machine for EV and HEV applications. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. . Li N, et al. (2018) “A double statoraxial field flux-switching memory machine with series permanent magnet anddc field winding,” In: IEEE international conference on applied superconductivity and electromagnetic devices (ASEMD), p. 1–2.

  16. Benţia I, et al. (2010) “Modular electrical machines–a survey,” In: Proceedings of the international scientific conference microCAD, p. 87–92

  17. Szabó L (2018) “Modular switched reluctance machines to be used in automotive applications,” In: workshop SRM drives an alternative for e‐traction, universitat politècnica de catalunya. GAECE-Grup d'accionaments elèctrics amb commutació electrònica. p 19–30.

  18. Thomas AS, Zhu ZQ, Wu LJ (2012) Novel modular-rotor switched-flux permanent magnet machines. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 48:2249–2258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y, Shih G (2016) Optimal design of an axial-flux permanent-magnet motor for an electric vehicle based on driving scenarios. Energies 9:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sulaiman E, Ahmad MZ, Kosaka T, Matsu N (2012) Design optimization studies on high torque and high-power density hybrid excitation flux switching motor for HEV. Procedia Eng 53(2013):312–322

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sulaiman EB, Khan F, Kosaka T (2016) Field-excited flux switching motor design, optimization and analysis for future hybrid electric vehicle using finite element analysis. Progress Electromag Res 71:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jenal M, Sulaiman E, Ahmad MZ, Khan F, & Omar, MF (2016). A new alternate circumferential and radial flux (AlCiRaF) permanent magnet flux switching machine for light weight EV. In 2016 XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) (pp. 2399–2405). IEEE.

  23. Orosz T, Rassõlkin A, Kallaste A, Arsénio P, Pánek D, Kaska J, Karban P (2020) Robust design optimization and emerging technologies for electrical machines: Challenges and open problems. Appl Sci 10(19):6653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin MH, Tsai JF, Chian-Son Yu (2012) A review of deterministic optimization methods in engineering and management. Math Prob Eng 2012:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/756023

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ion IG, Bontinck Z, Loukrezis D, Römer U, Lass O, Ulbrich S, De Gersem H (2018) Robust shape optimization of electric devices based on deterministic optimization methods and finite-element analysis with affine parametrization and design elements. Electr Eng 100(4):2635–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is entirely supported by ‘‘Research and Management Center, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) through TIER1 (Vot H755) and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS-RACER Vot RACER/1/2019/TK07/UTHM//1), respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Applied Electromagnetics (EMCenter), Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Institute of Integrated Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) Parit Raja, 86400, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia

    Irfan Ali Soomro, Erwan Bin Sulaiman, Md Zarafi Bin Ahmad & Roziah Aziz

  2. Electrical Engineering Department, Quaid-E-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan

    Irfan Ali Soomro

Authors
  1. Irfan Ali Soomro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erwan Bin Sulaiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md Zarafi Bin Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roziah Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irfan Ali Soomro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soomro, I.A., Sulaiman, E.B., Ahmad, M.Z.B. et al. Performance Analysis and Comparison for Various Excitation Source Salient Rotor with Modular Rotor Permanent Magnet of Flux Switching Machine. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 18, 2771–2782 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01357-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01357-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation