Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research on a Demand Response Interactive Scheduling Model of Home Load Groups

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to solve the problem that the potential between electrical appliances and each power supply is not timely in the current scheduling model, which may leads to high energy consumption and poor interaction performance, the research of interactive scheduling model for demand response of home load group is proposed. Four types of household appliances are obtained from the home load group structure diagram: core electrical appliances, electrical appliances capable of providing storing energy, electrical appliances of any use time, and load aggregators. By selecting multiple indicators, a load group response potential index system is constructed to measure the household based on the impacts of electrical and power response potentials; and two load-aggregate demand response models are established by integrating demand response resources through load aggregation. Furthermore, By combining the above two models with home load aggregation, the improved tabu search algorithm is used to determine the objective function and constraints, such that an interactive scheduling model for the family load group demand response is constructed. The experimental results show that the energy consumption of this model can be low after dispatching household load group. It can reduce household electricity consumption, and have good application performance. The model can effectively complete the interactive scheduling of the demand response of the home load group. It solves the problem of electricity wasting so as to save energy. In the meantime, it improves the user's real-time and convenient experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ji M, Zhang X, Tang X, Cheng TCE, Wei G, Tan Y (2016) Group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment. Int J Prod Res 54(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang Q, Feng S, Zhou M, Chiheb Ammari A (2017) Optimal load scheduling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles via weight-aggregation multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(9):2557–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y, Zhang D, Hu L, Hay Lee L (2017) A Data-driven and optimal bus scheduling model with time-dependent traffic and demand. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(9):2443–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu W, Yang Yi, Wang S, Bai E (2017) A scheduling model of logistics service supply chain based on the time windows of the FLSP’s operation and customer requirement. Ann Oper Res 257(1–2):183–206

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyu S, Jie Y, Jun M, Ciwei G, Ming Z, Mengyang L (2016) Combined dispatch model of adjustable load clusters considering response uncertainty. Power Syst Protect Control 44(23):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xinfeng W, Jianyun B, Shuping R (2017) Power plant air cooling unit load optimal dispatch control simulation. Comput Simul 34(7):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jingjing Y, Yong L, Minghua C, Ninghui Z, Guangyu H (2016) Interruptible load dispatch model and its peak load shifting optimization algorithm based on electrical appliance utility. Electric Power Constr 37(7):119–125

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wan Q, Chen Y, Bian Y (2017) Home energy management system optimal dispatch based on real-time electricity price. Appl Res Comput 34(9):2610–2613

    Google Scholar 

  9. Senouci A, Al-Derham HR (2008) Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective model for scheduling of linear construction projects. Adv Eng Softw 39(12):1023–1028

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Muralidharan S, Roy A, Saxena N (2018) MDP-based model for interest scheduling in IoT-NDN environment. IEEE Commun Lett 22(2):232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agamah S, Ekonomou L (2016) Peak demand shaving and load-levelling using a combination of bin packing and subset sum algorithms for electrical energy storage system scheduling. IET Sci Meas Technol 10(5):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2015.0218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agamah S, Ekonomou L (2018) A heuristic combinatorial optimization algorithm for load-leveling and peak demand reduction using energy storage systems. Electric Power Compon Syst 45(19):2093–2103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2017.1406017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng H, Zhihuang Su, Xiong N, Xiao Y (2016) Energy-efficient node scheduling algorithms for wireless sensor networks using Markov Random Field model. Inf Sci 329:461–477

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu Y, You F (2016) Integrated planning, scheduling, and dynamic optimization for batch processes: MINLP model formulation and efficient solution methods via surrogate modeling. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(34):13391–13411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faghih-Roohi S, Ong Y-S, Asian S, Zhang A (2016) Dynamic conditional value-at-risk model for routing and scheduling of hazardous material transportation networks. Ann Oper Res 247(2):715–734

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiguo Yu, Huang B, Cheng X (2017) Shortest link scheduling algorithms in wireless networks under the SINR model. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(3):2463–2657

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simon T, Nicolas Z, Rémy G (2017) Model and metaheuristics for a scheduling problem integrating procurement, sale and distribution decisions. Ann Oper Res 259(1):437–460

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang W, Zhang Y (2017) A model predictive control approach for low-complexity electric vehicle charging scheduling: optimality and scalability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(2):1050–1063

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Wang X, Wu X, Guo J (2017) Economic scheduling model of microgrid considering the lifetime of batteries. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(3):759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi H, You F (2016) Energy optimization of water supply system scheduling: Novel MINLP model and efficient global optimization algorithm. AIChE J 62(12):4277–4296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hidayat NPA, Cakravastia A, Samadhi TMAA (2017) A batch scheduling model for m heterogeneous batch processor. Int J Prod Res 54(4):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lv J, Ding T, Bie Z, Wang X (2017) A novel linearization variant of reliability costs in the optimal scheduling model. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(5):4140–4142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soares J, Ghazvini MAF, Borges N, Vale Z (2017) A stochastic model for energy resources management considering demand response in smart grids. Electric Power Syst Res 143:599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siano P, Sarno D (2016) Assessing the benefits of residential demand response in a real time distribution energy market. Appl Energy 161(1):533–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haider HT, See OH, Elmenreich W (2016) A review of residential demand response of smart grid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reihani E, Motalleb M, Thornton M, Ghorbani R (2016) A novel approach using flexible scheduling and aggregation to optimize demand response in the developing interactive grid market architecture. Appl Energy 183:445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Menke R, Abraham E, Parpas P, Stoianov I (2016) Demonstrating demand response from water distribution system through pump scheduling. Appl Energy 170:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan Z, Wang G, Li W, Tan Q, Yang W (2017) Application of CVaR risk aversion approach in the dynamical scheduling optimization model for virtual power plant connected with wind-photovoltaic-energy storage system with uncertainties and demand response”. Energy 124:198–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang FZ, Ren L, Liu H, Talari X, Shafie-khah S, Catalao M, Joao PS (2018) Multi-objective optimization model of source-load-storage synergetic dispatch for building energy system based on TOU price demand response. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(2):1017–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Behboodi S, Chassin DP, Djilali N, Crawford C (2017) Interconnection-wide hour-ahead scheduling in the presence of intermittent renewables and demand response: A surplus maximizing approach. Appl Energy 189:336–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mazidi M, Monsef H, Siano P (2016) Robust day-ahead scheduling of smart distribution networks considering demand response programs. Appl Energy 178:929–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shafie-Khah M, Siano P, Joao PSC (2018) Optimal demand response strategies to mitigate oligopolistic behavior of generation companies using a multi objective decision analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(4):4264–4274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nosratabadi SM, Hooshmand R-A, Gholipour E (2016) Stochastic profit-based scheduling of industrial virtual power plant using the best demand response strategy. Appl Energy 164:590–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maomao Hu, Xiao Fu, Wang L (2017) Investigation of demand response potentials of residential air conditioners in smart grids using grey-box room thermal model. Appl Energy 207:324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Panwar LK, Konda SR, Verma A, Panigrahi BK, Kumar R (2017) Demand response aggregator coordinated two-stage responsive load scheduling in distribution system considering customer behaviour. Let Gener Transm Distrib 11(4):1023–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharifi R, Anvari-Moghaddam A, Hamid Fathi S, Guerrero JM (2017) Economic demand response model in liberalised electricity markets with respect to flexibility of consumers. Let Gener Transm Distrib 11(17):4291–4298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mamun AS, Fathy HK (2018) Collective learning of lithium-ion aging model parameters for battery health-conscious demand response in datacenters. Energy 154:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cui L, Tang Y (2017) Optimal operation and sensitivity analysis of the combined cooling, heating and power microgrid. Electric Power Eng Technol 36(6):138–143

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu C, Wangi B (2017) Calculation of substitution elasticity of temperature-sensitive load based on CES utility function. Proc CSU-EPSA 29(11):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou Y, Wang J, Ziyan Wu, Keke Wu (2018) A multi-objective tabu search algorithm based on decomposition for multi-objective unconstrained binary quadratic programming problem. Knowl-Based Syst 141:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan Project (2016YFB0901100) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51577028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering, Southeast University, Xuanwu District, Sipailou 2#, Nanjing, 210096, China

    Qingshan Xu & Xiaoquan Jiao

Authors
  1. Qingshan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoquan Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoquan Jiao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Jiao, X. Research on a Demand Response Interactive Scheduling Model of Home Load Groups. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 15, 1079–1094 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-020-00406-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-020-00406-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation