Skip to main content
Log in

Category Flexibility in Emotion Learning

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Affective Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learners flexibly update category boundaries to adjust to the range of experiences they encounter. However, little is known about whether the degree of flexibility is consistent across domains. We examined whether categorization of social input, specifically emotions, is afforded more flexibility as compared to other biological input. To address this question, children (6–12 years; 32 female, 37 male; 7 Hispanic or Latino, 62 not Hispanic or Latino; 8 Black or African American, 14 multiracial, 46 White, 1 selected “other”) categorized faces morphed from calm to upset and animals morphed from a horse to a cow across task phases that differed in the distribution of stimuli presented. Learners flexibly adjusted both emotion and animal category boundaries according to distributional information, yet children showed more flexibility when updating their category boundaries for emotions. These results provide support for the idea that children—who must adjust to the vast and varied emotional signals of their social partners—respond to social signals dynamically in order to make predictions about the internal states and future behaviors of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the families who participated in this study and the research assistants who helped conduct the research, particularly Cassandra Windau, Carolyn Meissner, and Emily Weiss. Images were reproduced with permission from Tottenham et al. (2009) and Wood et al. (2016). The experiment was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rista C. Plate.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health through grant R01MH61285 to S.D.P. and in part by a core grant to the Waisman Center from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD105353). R.C.P. was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1256259) and the Richard L. and Jeanette A. Hoffman Wisconsin Distinguished Graduate Fellowship.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare competing interest.

Data Availability

The experimental paradigm, de-identified data, and analysis scripts are available on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/zckxq/.

Author Contribution

S.D.P. acquired funding for the research. R.C.P. and K.W. conducted data curation and formal analysis. R.C.P. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. All authors were involved with conceptualization, methodology, and reviewing and editing.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board approved the research.

Informed Consent

The parents of all participants provided informed written consent.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Eric A Walle

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plate, R.C., Woodard, K. & Pollak, S.D. Category Flexibility in Emotion Learning. Affec Sci 4, 722–730 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00192-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00192-3

Keywords

Navigation