From the 1st to 6th June of 2020, the tropical storm Cristobal moved across the Yucatan Peninsula in South-East Mexico. Characterized by its large size, winds and associated heavy rainfall, (with a record 623.3 mm) it caused widespread damage mainly due to flooding in the Mexican state of Yucatan, including the capital city of Merida (CONAGUA 2020). Following its course there were many reports from the residents of Merida which contained complaints about an increased nuisance due to an abundance of “giant black mosquitoes”, that were perceivably different from the common species (v.g. Aedes or Culex spp.), which had invaded neighborhoods and housing units in the East and West of the city with an associated concern for the potential spread of arboviruses (TYT 2020a, b).

Because of the COVID-19 contingency, non-intrusive rapid activities of surveillance and control of invasive nuisance species were implemented as part of response by the local Ministry of Health (MoH) to the reports of the community. Mosquito surveillance in urban areas is an integral part of the entomological surveillance protocol of the MoH of Yucatan and in many tropical cities of Mexico (DOF 2015). Ovitrapping for Aedes species, mainly Aedes aegypti is a systematic method (CENAPRECE 2015a) now set as a network with 5,183 ovitraps (dark containers with water and a rough surface covered with oviposition pieces of paper) distributed throughout the city (Gonzalez-Olvera et al. 2021); however, this method only detects container breeding mosquito species. Adult collections with portable electric aspirators are also performed across the city for adult mosquito surveillance, but only in 2–3 cross sectional surveys every year since 2013 (CENAPRECE 2015b).

Merida city capital of Yucatan state has a warm subhumid climate (Aw0 (x ') (i') g), with an average annual temperature of 28 °C; the minimum and maximum is 16 °C and 36 °C in January and May, respectively. The rainfall average is 1342.9 mm per year, with the rainy season occurring from May to November (García 2004). Special adult entomological collections were carried out from the 9th to 30th of June 2020 (three days after the storm finished) in the peri-domicile of 35 houses from 25 neighborhoods of Mérida city (Fig. 1). Staff of the Collaborative Unit for Entomological Bioassays of the Autonomous University of Yucatán (UCBE-UADY) and the local MoH, carried out 10-min collections per house of adult mosquitoes attracted to humans between 8:00 and 14:00 h with Prokopack aspirators (Vazquez-Prokopec et al. 2009). Collected specimens were preserved in containers and transferred to UCBE-UADY for sacrifice by freezing (-20 °C) and were later identified using specialized keys (Darsie and Ward 2005; Harrison et al. 2008). Sample of the specimens were sent to the National Entomology Laboratory of Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos (InDRE) of the Mexican Ministry of Health for species confirmation and were deposited in the InDRE Collection of Arthropods with Medical Importance (CAIM).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Species of mosquitoes collected after the tropical storm Cristobal (June 2020) with Prokopack aspirators in the peridomicile of houses (dots) and various neighborhoods (shaded areas) of the city of Merida, Yucatan, Mexico

In total, 1,275 specimens of mosquito from 4 genera and 13 species were collected: Aedes taeniorhynchus (92%), Culex quinquefasciatus (72%), Aedes aegypti (72%), Psorophora mexicana (36%), Psorophora cyanescens (32%), Aedes scapularis (24%), Culex nigripalpus (24%), Aedes albopictus (8%), Psorophora ferox (4%), Haemagogus equinus (4%), Aedes trivittatus (4%), Culex coronator (4%), Culex iolambdis (4%) (Table 1). The collection with Prokopack aspirators while being attracted to the collectors suggests that they are anthropophilic to a greater or lesser degree. Most of the species have been previously reported in Merida, from larvae growing in containers predominantly in the peri-domicile (backyard). Reports come largely from larval surveys made by the MoH and research projects (Najera-Vazquez et al. 2004; Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010; Manrique-Saide et al. 2010; Baak-Baak et al. 2016). In this context, one of the most important factors which contribute with mosquito diversity in Merida is the wide availability and productivity of artificial and natural breeding sites (Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010), which include bottles, bath, cooking and washing utensils, pet animal drinking dishes, swimming pool, flowerpots, small plastic rubbish, large tanks, tires, natural holes (rocks, trees), cans, laundry tubes, discarded appliances, stormwater drains/catch basins and miscellaneous objects (Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Manrique-Saide et al. 2008).

Table 1 Mosquito species collected from different neighborhoods after tropical storm Cristobal in Merida, Yucatan, and their collection parameters

The most abundant species collected was Aedes (Ochlerotatus) taeniorhynchus, which represented 56% of the collected specimens, with a wide distribution in the houses (86.6%) and neighborhoods (92%) sampled (Table 1). This species, known as the black salt marsh mosquito, has been reported as a predominant species after storms (Morrow et al. 2008). In Yucatan, it is very common in the coastal areas (Manrique-Saide et al. 2010) and frequently invades Merida (which is 30 km from the coast) in large numbers after storm winds, heavy rains, and flooding events (Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010). The other most common and widely distributed species collected were Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Table 1), which were collected in lower numbers than Ae. taeniorhynchus but were found in 60–70% of the houses and neighborhoods sampled. Both species, well adapted to the human environment and breed in peri-domiciliary man-made breeding sites (Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Manrique-Saide et al. 2008), are common in Merida and other human settlements of Yucatan (Najera-Vazquez et al. 2004; Baak-Baak et al. 2016).

Two other species, Aedes (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani) and Culex (Culex) nigripalpus (Theobald), were collected in low numbers but found in around 30% of the neighborhoods. These species have been also previously reported from Merida, with low numbers and breeding in outdoor containers (Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Baak-Baak et al. 2016). The remaining species of the genera Culex and Aedes, including Ae. (Stegomyia) albopictus, have been previously reported breeding in low numbers in Merida and suburban areas (Najera-Vazquez et al. 2004; Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010; Contreras-Perera et al. 2019; Gonzalez-Olvera et al. 2021). This is consistent with previous surveys in Merida, where most of the mosquito species reported were found in a variety of artificial and natural breeding sites. Especially, Ae. aegypti, Cx. thriambus, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and Cx. coronator were observed in all categories of breeding sites described above (Manrique-Saide et al. 2008; Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010; Baak-Baak et al. 2016).

Some of the reports in the media and on social media described large mosquitos similar to Psorophora species (TYT 2020a, b). Indeed, three Psorophora species: Ps. (Janthinosoma) cyanescens (Coquillett), Ps. (Janthinosoma) ferox (von Humboldt) and Ps. (Janthinosoma) mexicana, were collected from houses at Merida. Ps. cyanescens were collected in larger numbers than the others, but both Ps. cyanescens and Ps. mexicana were collected in around 30% of the neighborhoods sampled. These species are not commonly found, much less with such abundance and distribution, in the residential urban area of Merida. In fact, we report the species Ps. mexicana for the first time for the state of Yucatan, previously this species was reported in the locality of Lerma and the south of Campeche State in the Yucatan Peninsula (Heinemann and Belkin 1977). Cx. iolambdis represent new record for the city of Merida, this species is common in the coast and flooded areas of Yucatan. And was reported in the municipalities of Dzemul and Progreso in Yucatan State (Baak-Baak et al. 2016; Navarrete-Carballo et al. 2021). We argue that local invasion of these species was because of the storm. Now sum 30 reported species for Merida (Najera-Vázquez et al. 2004; Zapata-Peniche et al. 2007; Manrique-Saide and Zapata-Peniche 2010; Baak-Baak et al. 2016). Ps. mexicana can be distinguished from other related species by its hind tarsomere 4 entirely dark scaled, rarely with pale scales at base and its 5 tarsomere entirely or rarely partially pale scaled. The larva and males of Ps. mexicana are unknown (Darsie and Ward 2005; Harrison et al. 2008).

Similar events occurred in St. John's County, FL (comparable climate conditions as Yucatan) from Hurricane Matthew and Irma (2016 and 2017 respectively). The flooding triggered mosquito population outbreaks after 10 and 9 days (2nd peak event after a month), respectively (with similar species composition as reported in this study). In response of the outbreaks, the control services used intensively and extensively both ground (ULV, larvicides) and aerial applications for control (Weaver et al. 2020).

From these results, it is reported that the increase in mosquitoes was due to invasive species such as Ae. taeniorhynchus and Psorophora species (TYT 2020a, b). City wide, vehicle mounted ULV spraying was performed by the MoH and the municipality of Merida to control adult mosquito populations. An intensive campaign to eliminate mosquito breeding sites with “Descacharrización” (Barrera et al. 2015) complemented by the distribution of larvicide was also performed as part of the protocol to control Ae. aegypti in emergency situations to prevent the risk of dengue, chikungunya and Zika transmissions.

Research funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and The International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (Preventing Zika disease with novel vector control approaches Project 108412 and Enabling Business and Technologies to Contribute to the Control of Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Latin America Project 109071–002) and by Fondo Mixto CONACyT (Mexico)–Gobierno del Estado de Yucatán (Project YUC-2017–03-01–556). Abdiel Martin-Park is supported by the Catedras-CONACYT program. Special thanks to Suzanna Shugert for grammatical corrections.