Abstract
Purpose
Permanent prostate seed implant brachytherapy is widely adopted as a successful treatment method for prostate cancer. While radiographic planar fluoroscopy images are a well-established method to determine the location of seeds implanted in the prostate, many have investigated computed tomography (CT) to determine it. In this study, our purpose is to develop an automatic algorithm to accurately identify the seed positions, direction, and at the same time, to estimate the number of I-125 seeds implanted during the treatment procedure, as implanted seeds location is helpful information in intraoperative dosimetry in low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Methods
A prostate phantom with a total of 40 I-125 implanted dummy seeds and 22 patients with a total of 1091 implanted seeds were scanned using CT imaging device with 2.5 mm slice thickness and radiography imaging. Phase congruency (PC) was performed to enhance edge detection and seed visualization. Seed detection was performed using the histogram analysis of the processed image, and the calculation of the probability of the number of separate and overlapped seeds was performed using registration process between CT and Fluoroscopy images.
Results
This algorithm could successfully recognize 98.28% of the seeds without losing any image information, and therefore could correctly estimate the number of seeds, which is an essential step to maintain the high-quality treatment of prostate brachytherapy.
Conclusion
While the simulation results demonstrate the capability of the proposed algorithm, it is sensitive to the imaging process due to its dependency upon the CT and radiography image fusion procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data of the article is available and will be sent upon the editor's request.
References
Birckhead BJ, Fossum CC, Deufel CL, Furutani KM, Merrell KW, Schueler BA, Mynderse LA, Choo R, Davis BJ. Stranded seed displacement, migration, and loss after permanent prostate brachytherapy as estimated by day 0 fluoroscopy and 4-month postimplant pelvic x-ray. Am Brachytherapy Soc. 2016;15(6):714–21.
Bloch BN, Lenkinski RE, Helbich TH, et al. Prostate postbrachytherapy seed distribution: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced, T1- and T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:70–8.
Chin J, Rumble RB, Kollmeier M, Heath E, Efstathiou J, Dorff T, et al. Brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer: american society of clinical oncology/cancer care Ontario joint guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0466.
Crehange G, Roach M, Martin E, et al. Salvage reirradiation for locoregional failure after radiation therapy for prostate cancer: who, when, where and how? Cancer Radiother. 2014;18(524):e534.
De Brabandere M, Hoskin P, Haustermans K, Van Den Heuvel F, Siebert FA. Prostate post-implant dosimetry: Interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:192–8.
Dubois DF, Prestidge BR, Hotchkiss LA, et al. Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39:1037–41.
Girum KB, Lalande A, Quivrin M, Bessieres I, Pierrat N, Martin E, Cormier L, Petitfils A, Cosset JM, Crehange G. Inferring postimplant dose distribution of salvage permanent prostate implant (PPI) after primary PPI on CT images. Brachytherapy. 2018;17(6):866–73.
Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB, Pauly JM, Koch KM, Gold GE. Metalinduced artifacts in MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2011.
Hsu CC, Hsu H, Pickett B, et al. Feasibility of mr imaging/mr spectroscopy-planned focal partial salvage permanent prostate implant (ppi) for localized recurrence after initial ppi for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(370):e377.
http://tabamic.com/ Taba Medial Imaging Center
Jain AK, Zhou Y, Mustufa T, et al. Matching and reconstruction of brachytherapy seeds using the Hungarian algorithm (MARSHAL). Med Phys. 2005;32:3475–92.
Kovesi P. Image features from phase congruency. Videre. 1999;1(3):1–26.
Maes F, Collinon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging. 1997;16(2):187–98.
Mitina N, Christie D, Hill B, Middlebrook N, Nadezhdin N. Which patients benefit from post-implant CT dosimetry after real-time intraoperative planning for low dose rate prostate brachytherapy? Case series and systematic literature review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016;60:260–7.
Nag, et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat OncolBiol Phys. 2000;46:221–8.
Nosrati R, Soliman A, Safigholi H, Hashemi M, Wronski M, Morton G, Pejovic´-Milic´ A, Stanisz G, Song WY. MRI-based automated detection of implanted low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy seeds using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and unsupervised machine learning (ML). Radiother Oncol. 2018;129:540–54.
Orio PF, Merrick GS, Grimm P, Blasko J, Sylvester J, Allen ZA, et al. Effects of the time interval between prostate brachytherapy and postimplant dosimetric evaluation in community practice. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:523–31.
Pinkawa M, Gagel B, Asadpour B, Piroth M, Klotz J, Borchers H, Jakse G, Eble M. Seed displacements after permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer in dependence on the prostate level. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008;184(10):520–5.
Pinkawa M, Asadpour B, Piroth MD, Gagel B, Klotz J, Fischedick K, Borchers H, Jakse G, Eble MJ. Rectal dosimetry following prostate brachytherapy with stranded seeds—comparison of transrectal ultrasound intra-operative planning (day 0) and computed tomography-postplanning (day 1 vs. day 30) with special focus on sources placed close to the rectal wall. Radiotherapy Oncol. 2009;91(2):207–12.
Polo A, Cattani F, Vavassori A, Origgi D, Villa G, Marsiglia H, et al. MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2004;60:1572–9.
Prete JJ, Prestidge BR, Bice WS, Dubois DF, Hotchkiss LA. Comparison of MRIand CT-based post-implant dosimetric analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Radiat Oncol Investig. 1998;6:90–6.
Rosenthal SA, Bittner NHJ, Beyer DC, Demanes DJ, Goldsmith BJ, Horwitz EM, et al. Practice guideline for the transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2011;79:335–41.
Salembier C, Lavagnini P, Nickers P, Mangili P, Rijnders A, Polo A, et al. Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: a supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;83:3–10.
Skowronek J. Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer—between options. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2013;5:33–41.
Su Y, Davis BJ, Herman MG, et al. Prostate brachytherapy seed localization by analysis of multiple projections: Identifying and addressing the seed overlap problem. Med Phys. 2004;28:2265–71.
Tubic D, Zaccarin A, Pouliot J, Beaulieu L. Automated seed detection and three-dimensional reconstruction I Seed localization from fluoroscopic images or radiographs" in. Med Phys. 2002;28(11):265–71.
William M, Wells III. Paul Viola, Hideki Atsumi, Shin Nakajima, and Ron Kikinis Multi-Modal Volume Registration by Maximization of Mutual Information. Med Image Analys. 1996;1(1):35–51.
Alexander Wong, Paul Fieguth. Fast phase-based registration of multimodal image data, Signal Processing, 2009
Xu, C., Verhaegen, F., Beaulie, L. (2011) An algorithm for efficient metal artifact reductions in permanent seed implant. AAPM, 38.
E. Zeraatkar, S. Kermani, A. Mehridehnavi, A. Aminzadeh, E. Zeraatkar, H. Sanei. Arrhythmia detection based on morphological and time-frequency features of T-wave in electrocardiogram Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors, 1, 2011.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gholamian, M., Yazdi, M. & Faghihi, R. Automatic numeration and localization of I-125 seeds in the post-implant prostate images based on CT and radiography image fusion. Res. Biomed. Eng. 39, 415–425 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-023-00276-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-023-00276-w