Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

European energy market liberalization: experiences and challenges

  • Special Feature: Research article
  • Energy Market Reform
  • Published:
International Journal of Economic Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European electricity market liberalization process started more than 20 years ago, one of its main purposes being to organize the provision of electricity and gas more efficiently by introducing competitive forces where possible and regulation where needed. Despite the fact that most Member States of the European Union (EU) have liberalized their electricity market, a European internal market for electricity—one of the ultimate goals of EU energy policy—has not been realized yet. For this to be realised a number of remaining obstacles need to be removed. This paper gives a brief overview of the EU electricity market liberalization process and surveys the main remaining issues and challenges. At the retail market level, additional efforts are required to increase retail competition and to remove regulated retail prices. Also, more effort is required to physically integrate existing regional electricity markets, by removing the existing barriers between regions and countries. Building new interconnection capacity and improving the allocation procedures for cross-border capacities can help achieving this. Furthermore, the EU should increase efforts to further harmonize and integrate electricity markets and electricity market policies and to encourage the demand-side of the market to participate more intensively through demand response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some Member States had two of such vertically integrated firms, but then these forms would be regionally organized.

  2. CIA World factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/.

  3. Directive 96/92/EC and Directive 2003/54/EC. Both Directives and other legal texts can be download from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/.

  4. For a more detailed description, we refer to (IPA Advisory Limited [15]). This document can be downloaded from the ACER website.

  5. Details on the assumptions behind and the construction of the ACRI indicator can be found in IPA Advisory Limited [15], ACER [1] and ACER [2].

  6. For a description of each of these regions, we refer to ACER decision No 06/2016 of 17 November 2016, to be found on the website of ACER.

References

  1. ACER (2015). Annual report on the results of monitoring the internal electricity and natural gas markets in 2014 (p. 329). Luxembourg: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.

  2. ACER (2016). Annual report on the results of monitoring the internal electricity and gas markets in 2015. Retail Markets (p. 83). Luxembourg: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.

  3. ACER (2017a). Annual report on the results of monitoring the internal electricity and gas markets in 2016. Electricity and gas retail markets volume (p. 24). Luxembourg: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.

  4. ACER (2017b). Annual report on the results of monitoring the internal electricity and gas markets in 2016. Electricity wholesale markets volume (p. 78). Luxembourg: Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.

  5. Auer, H. and Burgholzer, B. (2015). Opportunities, challenges and risks for res-E deployment in a fully integrated european electricity market: Market4RES (p. 71).

  6. Borenstein, S., & Holland, S. (2005). On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36(3), 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crampes, C., & Waddams, C. (2017). Empowering electricity consumers in retail and wholesale markets (p. 44): CERRE Report.

  8. De Jong, J., Hassel, A., Jansen, J., Egenhofer, C., & Xu, Z. (2017). Improving the market for flexibility in the electricity sector. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission. (2016). Clean energy for all Europeans. Brussels: COM(2016) 860 final.

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission. (2016). Energy prices and costs in Europe (p. 20). Brussels: COM(2016) 769 final: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glachant, J.-M., & Ruester, S. (2014). The Eu internal electricity market: done forever? Utilities Policy, 31, 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gouardères, F., Mcwatt, V., & Fleuret, L. (2018). Internal energy market (p. 5). Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  13. IEA. (2014). Energy Policies of Iea Countries: European Union: Organisation for economic co-operation and development/organisation for economic co-operation and development (p. 312).

  14. Ioannidou, M. (2018). Effective paths for consumer empowerment and protection in retail energy markets. Journal of Consumer Policy, 41(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IPA Advisory LIMITED. (2015). Ranking the competitiveness of retail electricity and gas markets: A proposed methodology (p. 95). London: IPA Advisory LIMITED.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kanellakis, M., Martinopoulos, G., & Zachariadis, T. (2013). European energy policy—A review. Energy Policy, 62(Supplement C), 1020–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Langsdorf, S. (2011). Eu energy policy: From the Ecsc to the energy roadmap 2050 (p. 9). Brussels: Green European Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pepermans, G., Driesen, J., Haeseldonckx, D., Belmans, R., & D’Haeseleer, W. (2005). Distributed generation: Definition, benefits and issues. Energy Policy, 33(6), 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poudineh, R., & Jamasb, T. (2014). Distributed generation, storage, demand response and energy efficiency as alternatives to grid capacity enhancement. Energy Policy, 67, 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Pepermans.

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation for the 2017 International JEPA conference in Okinawa, Japan (November 4, 2017).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pepermans, G. European energy market liberalization: experiences and challenges. IJEPS 13, 3–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42495-018-0009-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42495-018-0009-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation