Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Latex, colloidal and film properties of concentrated skim latex prepared using membrane filtration process

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Rubber Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a long time, skim latex has been regarded as waste from the latex centrifugation process. To recover the rubber, skim latex is coagulated using strong acid due to the high presence of non-rubbers, resulting in products of low quality and unpleasant odour. Additionally, the acid discharged into effluent ponds causes malodour and adversely affects the health of nearby residents. Considering this, a novel method employing a membrane filtration system was utilised, successfully recovering and concentrating skim latex while removing water-soluble non-rubbers. The resulting latex concentrate was then compared to raw skim latex in terms of latex, colloidal, and film properties. Latex properties, namely total solids content (TSC), dry rubber content (DRC), alkalinity, nitrogen content, and gel content were determined. For the colloidal properties, particle size and distribution, zeta potential, and rheological properties (flow and viscoelastic behaviours), were characterised. The film properties assessed included the swelling index, appearance, and tensile properties. Significant improvements in latex properties after concentrating were observed, with both TSC and DRC increasing to 42% and 36%, respectively, while alkalinity, nitrogen, and gel contents decreased to 0.61%, 2.23%, and 54%, respectively. Particle size distribution in raw skim latex (RSL) exhibited a tri-modal distribution, but after membrane filtration, concentrated skim latex (CSL) showed a bi-modal distribution with particle sizes ranging from 0.03 to 0.3 µm and 0.3 to 5 µm and average sizes of 0.07 and 1 µm, respectively. Changes were also noted in zeta potential and rheological behaviour after membrane filtration. The isoelectric point of zeta potential shifted to a higher pH, from 4.2 for RSL to 4.9 for CSL, and the absolute zeta potential values decreased with increasing pH values. CSL also demonstrated a different flow behaviour, fitting well to the Herschel-Bulkley model, unlike RSL, which conformed to the Bingham model. Membrane concentration resulted in significant increases in CSL yield stress, consistency index, and shear thinning behaviour, leading to higher moduli values and indicating increased interaction between CSL particles. Conversely, CSL films prepared via casting swelled more in toluene, approximately two times more than RSL films. Nevertheless, RSL films were more opaque and only became transparent after leaching, indicating high non-rubber contents. Regarding tensile properties, both unleached and leached CSL films exhibited a similar tensile versus elongation profile, with ultimate tensile strength and elongation at break values ranging between 1.4 and 1.6 MPa and 650 and 700%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lim HM, Misni M (2016) Colloidal and rheological properties of natural rubber latex concentrate. Appl Rheol 26(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gomez JB, Moir GFJ (1979) The ultracytology of latex vessels in hevea brasiliensis. MRRDB Monograph No 4:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeang HY, Esah Y, Samsidah H (1995) Characterisation of zone 1 and zone 2 rubber particles in Hevea brasiliensis latex. J Nat Rubb Res 10(2):108–123

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nawamawat K, Sakdapipanich JT, Ho CC, Ma Y, Song J (2011) Surface nanostructure of Hevea brasiliensis natural rubber latex particles. Colloids Surfaces A Physisochem Eng Aspects 390:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McGavack J (1959) The preservation and concentration of Hevea Latex. Rubber Chem Technol 32(5):1660–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeang HY, Esah Y, Samsidar H (1995) Characterisation of zone 1 and zone 2 rubber particles in Hevea brasiliensis latex. J Nat Rubb Res 10(2):108–123

    Google Scholar 

  7. Subramaniam A (1980) Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of natural rubber. RRIM Technol Bull 4:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker HC (1958) Rubber from centrifuged skim latex. Rubber Develop 11(1):2–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Veerasamy D, Nik Ismail NI, Mohd Nor Z (2013) New materials from concentrated skim latex. MRB Rubber Technol Dev 13(2):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lau CM, Subramaniam A (1989) Recovery and applications of waste solids from natural rubber latex serum. Proc Rubb Growers Conference Malacca Kuala Lumpur 23:525–547

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith MG (1969) Recent aspects of block natural rubber production by mechanical methods. J Rubb Res Inst Malaysa 22(1):78–86

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bristow GM (1990) Composition and cure behaviour of skim block natural rubber. Nat Rubb Res 5(2):114–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris JE (1954) Improved rubbers by the enzymatic deproteinisation of skim latex. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Rubber technology Conference, London 13–37

  14. George KM, Alex R, Joseph S, Thomas KT (2009) Characterization of enzyme-deproteinized skim rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 114:3319–3324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sethu S, Subbiah RM (1973) Deammoniation of skim latex using a new desorption column. Proc Rubb Res Inst Malaysia Plrs Conf 1973:381–385

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ab Kadir Bakti N (1990) Ammonia stripping from skim latex using the baffle-plate and rotating-blade counter-current colums. In: The 6th Symposium of Malaysian Chemical Engineers, University Technology Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 4 – 5 June 1990:IAP-1 – IAP-13

  17. Khoo TC, Ong CO, Rais AR (1991) A new process for skim rubber production. Proceedings RRIM Rubber Growers’ Conference 1991:495–510

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ng CS (1983) Quaternary ammonium surfactants as alternative coagulants of skim latex – A laboratory study. J Rubb Res Inst Malaysia 31(1):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  19. Danwanichakul D, Rattanaphan O, Srisatjang J, Danwanichakul D (2014) Extraction of protein from skim natural rubber latex using PEG as a surfactant via low speed centrifugation and continuous flow. J Appl Poly Sci 131(4):39900–39908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Than-ardna B, Tamura H, Furuike T (2019) Improving deproteinized skim natural rubber latex with a further leaching process. Eng Appl Sci Res 46(1):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sakdapipanich JT, Nawamawati K, Tanaka Y (2002) Recovery of deproteinised small rubber particles from skim natural rubber latex: Effect of some inorganic salts. J Rubb Res 5(1):1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sethu S (1964) Ion-exchange membranes. Application to the treatment of natural rubber skim latex. J Appl Polym Sci 8:2249–2259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Devaraj V, Zairossani M, Pretibaa S, Aimi I (2012) An ultrafiltration system for concentration of latices and a process utilizing the system. Malaysian Patent Application No. PI 2012004868

  24. Devaraj V, Zairossani MN, Pretibaa S (2006) membrane separation as a cleaner processing technology for natural raw rubber processing. J Appl Membrane Sci Technol 4:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  25. Veerasamy D, Supurmaniam A, Nor ZM (2009) Evaluating the use of in-situ ultrasonication to reduce fouling during natural rubber skim latex (waste latex) recovery by ultrafiltration. Desalination 236:202–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Devaraj V, Zairossani MN (2013) Environmentally friendly latices processing by ultrafiltration membrane system. Proceedings of Smithers RAPRA ‘Latex 2013 and Synthetic Polymer Dispersions, Kuala Lumpur, 10–11 September 2013

  27. ISO (2014) ISO 124 latex, rubber – Determination of total solids content

  28. ISO (2005) ISO 126 natural rubber latex concentrate – Determination of dry rubber content

  29. ISO (2011) ISO 125 Natural rubber latex concentrate – Determination of alkalinity

  30. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science:principles and applications. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. ISO (2011) ISO 37 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic – Determination of tensile stress-strain properties

  32. Joseph R (2013) Practical Guide to Latex Technology. Smithers Rapra Technology Ltd, United Kingdom

  33. Bozzola JJ, Russell LD (1992) Electron Microscopy: Principles and techniques for biologist. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yusof NH, Manroshan S, Mohd Rasdi FR, Tan KS (2022) Properties of concentrated skim rubber latex using membrane separation process and its comparison with other natural rubber latexes. J Rubb Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-022-00189-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hasma H (1992) Proteins of natural rubber latex concentrate. J Nat Rubb Res 7(2):102–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hasma H, Amir Hashim MY (1997) Changes to NR latex proteins on processing the latex to its products. J Nat Rubb Res 12(1):21–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bingham EC (1922) Fluidity and plasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Herschel WH, Bulkley R (1926) Measurement of consistency as applied to rubber-benzene solutions. Proc Am Soc Test Mater 26:621–633

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K (1993) An introduction to rheology. Rheology series,3. Elsevier Science Publishers, The Netherlands

  40. Bjӧrn A, De La Monja PS, Karlsson, Ejlertsson J, Svensson BH (2012) Chapter 3. Rheological characterization. In: Biogas. Edited by Kumar S. IntechOpen Limited, London UK

  41. Quemada D (1998) Rheological modeling of complex fluids. I. The concept of effective volume fraction revisited. Eur Phys J AP 1:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pestridge C, Tadros ThF (1988) Rheological investigation of depletion flocculation of concentrated sterically stabilized polystyrene latex dispersions. Coll Surf 31:325–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Manroshan S (2018) The colloidal properties of commercial natural rubber latex concentrates. J Rubb Res 21(2):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mardina V, Yusof F (2018) Skim latex serum as an alternative nutrition for microbial growth. In: Amid A, Sulaiman S, Jimat D, Azmin N (eds) Multifaceted protocol in biotechnology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2257-0_15

  45. Hasma H, Subramaniam A (1986) Composition of lipids in latex of Hevea brasiliensis clone RRIM 501. J Nat Rubb Res 1(1):30–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Manroshan S, Azhar ME, Baharin A (2020) Effect of maillard reaction in ammonia preserved natural rubber latex using reducing sugars. J Rubb Res 23:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Director General of Malaysian Rubber Board for granting permission to publish this paper. The invaluable assistance rendered by Hishamudin Samat in preparing the skim latex concentrate and to Fauziah Jalani for her expertise in characterising the latex, colloidal and physical properties of the latexes are highly appreciated. The authors also wish to acknowledge Veronica Charlotte for language editing. This research was supported by funding from the Malaysian Rubber Board Internal Grant 758 (2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Malaysian Rubber Board, 47000 Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia

    Manroshan Singh Jaswan Singh, Nurul Hayati Yusof & Fatimah Rubaizah Mohd Rasdi

Authors
  1. Manroshan Singh Jaswan Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nurul Hayati Yusof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatimah Rubaizah Mohd Rasdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manroshan Singh Jaswan Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associate interests that represent a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaswan Singh, M., Yusof, N.H. & Mohd Rasdi, F.R. Latex, colloidal and film properties of concentrated skim latex prepared using membrane filtration process. J Rubber Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-024-00251-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-024-00251-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation