Abstract
The aerodynamic benefit for conventional vortex generator (VG) is often counterbalanced by the appearance of parasite drag. An immovable installation similar to a fixture also limited its application. To overcome those issues, this paper proposes a variable-incidence-angle vortex generator (VIVG). Counter-rotated miniature gears with a single rack-pinion system adjust the incidence angle of the VIVG, thereby precisely control mixing flux at boundary layer interface with minimizing the parasite drag. The variable incidence angle of the VIVG was then examined to evaluate the applicability of the VIVG at low Reynolds number. The VIVG was mounted on a NACA 0015 airfoil, and a low-turbulence blowing type wind tunnel was employed. We found that the VIVG effectively eliminated laminar separation bubbles, and suppressed separation at Reynolds number of 5.4 × 104; excessive lift production at low Reynolds number became similar to a theoretical value of potential flow (CL = 2πα). It was also found that the VIVG can reduce the drag in the pre-stall region at the low Re with small incidence angles, providing a noticeable increment of the lift-to-drag ratio. The large incidence angle of VIVG was also useful both to extend the stall point and to produce higher lift force with reasonable efficiency. These clearly indicate that the VIVG is applicable for performance improvement of aerodynamic devices operated in low Reynolds number flow fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McTavish S, Feszty D, Nitzsche F (2013) Evaluating reynolds number effects in small-scale wind turbine experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 120:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.006
Tani I (1964) Low-speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog Aerosp Sci 5:70–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(64)90004-1
Lessaman PBS (1983) Low-reynolds-number airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:223–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001255
Genç MS, Karasu İ, Açıkel HH, Akpolat MT (2012) Low Reynolds number flows and transition. In: Genç MS (ed) Low Reynolds number aerodynamics and transition. InTech, Rijeka, pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5772/31131
Alam MM, Zhou Y, Yang HX, Guo H, Mi J (2010) The ultra-low Reynolds number airfoil wake. Exp Fluids 48:81–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0713-7
Huang RF, Lee HW (1999) Effects of freestream turbulence on wing-surface flow and aerodynamic performance. J Aircraft 36(6):965–972. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2537
Rinoie K, Takemura N (2004) Oscillating behavior of laminar separation bubble formed on an aerofoil near stall. Aeronaut J 108(1081):153–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000000063
Yang Z, Haan FL, Hui H (2007) An experimental investigation on the flow separation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil,. AIAA-2007-0275, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-275
Kim D-H, Chang J-W, Chung J (2011) Low-Reynolds-number effect on aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA 0012 airfoil. J Aircraft 48(4):1212–1215. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031223
Genç MS, Karasu İ, Açıkel HH (2012) An experimental study on aerodynamics of NACA2415 aerofoil at low Re numbers. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 39:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.029
Yarusevych S, Kawall JG, Sullivan PE (2003) Effect of acoustic excitation on airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 41(8):1599–1601. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2113
Yarusevych S, Sullivan PE, Kawall JG (2007) Effect of acoustic excitation amplitude on airfoil boundary layer and wake development. AIAA J 45(4):760–771. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25439
Ricci R, Montelpare S, Silvi E (2007) Study of acoustic disturbances effect on laminar separation bubble by IR thermography. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 31(4):349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.08.007
Genç MS, Lock G, Kaynak Ü (2008) An experimental and computational study of low Re number transitional flows over an aerofoil with leading edge slat. In: AIAA-2008-8877, 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, Alaska, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-8877
Genç MS, Kaynak Ü, Yapici H (2011) Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous blowing and suction. Eur J Mech B Fluids 30(2):218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.11.001
Wahidi R, Bridges DH (2012) Effects of distributed suction on an airfoil at low Reynolds number. AIAA J 50(3):523–539. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050913
Goodfellow SD, Yarusevych S, Sullivan P (2010) Low Reynolds number flow control over an airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. In: IMECE2010-39728, ASME 2010 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2010-39728
Feero MA, Goodfellow SD, Lavoie P, Sullivan PE (2015) Flow reattachment using synthetic ject actuation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. AIAA J 53(7):2005–2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053605
Choi J, Jeon WP, Choi HC (2002) Control of flow around an airfoil using Piezoceramic actuators. AIAA J 40(5):1008–1010. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1741
Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Broeren AP, Giguere P (1996) Experiments on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA-96-0062, 34th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-62
Nickerson JD (1986) A study of vortex generators at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA-86-0155, 24th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-155
Kerho M, Hutcherson S, Blackwelder RF, Liebeck RH (1993) Vortex generators used to control laminar separation bubbles. J Aircraft 3:315–319. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46336
Seshagiri A, Cooper E, Traub LW (2009) Effects of vortex generators on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J Aircraft 46(1):116–122. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36241
Lin JC (1992) Control of low-speed turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing ramp. Ph.D. Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA
Ashill PR, Fulker JL, Hackett KC (2001) Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs). In: AIAA-2001-0887, 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-887
Griffin DA (1996) Investigation of vortex generators for augmentation of wind turbine power performance. Technical Report NREL/SR-440-21399, NREL
Baldacchino D, Ferreira C, Tavernier DD, Timmer WA, van Bussel GJW (2018) Experimental parameter study for passive vortex generators on a 30% thick airfoil. Wind Energy 21:745–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2191
AGARD Working Group (1999) Standard: assessment of experimental uncertainty with application to wind tunnel testing. AIAA Standards/AIAA S-071A-1999, AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.473647
Lin JC (1999) Control of turbulent boundary-layer separation using micro-vortex generators, AIAA-99-3404. In: 30th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-3404
Lin JC (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(4–5):389–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-0421(02)00010-6
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the New and Renewable Energy Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resources by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20153030023880).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, HH., Kim, HY., Han, JS. et al. A Development and Assessment of Variable-Incidence Angle Vortex Generator at Low Reynolds Number of ~ 5×104. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 836–842 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0099-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0099-y