Skip to main content
Log in

A Development and Assessment of Variable-Incidence Angle Vortex Generator at Low Reynolds Number of ~ 5×104

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aerodynamic benefit for conventional vortex generator (VG) is often counterbalanced by the appearance of parasite drag. An immovable installation similar to a fixture also limited its application. To overcome those issues, this paper proposes a variable-incidence-angle vortex generator (VIVG). Counter-rotated miniature gears with a single rack-pinion system adjust the incidence angle of the VIVG, thereby precisely control mixing flux at boundary layer interface with minimizing the parasite drag. The variable incidence angle of the VIVG was then examined to evaluate the applicability of the VIVG at low Reynolds number. The VIVG was mounted on a NACA 0015 airfoil, and a low-turbulence blowing type wind tunnel was employed. We found that the VIVG effectively eliminated laminar separation bubbles, and suppressed separation at Reynolds number of 5.4 × 104; excessive lift production at low Reynolds number became similar to a theoretical value of potential flow (CL = 2πα). It was also found that the VIVG can reduce the drag in the pre-stall region at the low Re with small incidence angles, providing a noticeable increment of the lift-to-drag ratio. The large incidence angle of VIVG was also useful both to extend the stall point and to produce higher lift force with reasonable efficiency. These clearly indicate that the VIVG is applicable for performance improvement of aerodynamic devices operated in low Reynolds number flow fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McTavish S, Feszty D, Nitzsche F (2013) Evaluating reynolds number effects in small-scale wind turbine experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 120:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tani I (1964) Low-speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog Aerosp Sci 5:70–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(64)90004-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lessaman PBS (1983) Low-reynolds-number airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:223–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.001255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Genç MS, Karasu İ, Açıkel HH, Akpolat MT (2012) Low Reynolds number flows and transition. In: Genç MS (ed) Low Reynolds number aerodynamics and transition. InTech, Rijeka, pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5772/31131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Alam MM, Zhou Y, Yang HX, Guo H, Mi J (2010) The ultra-low Reynolds number airfoil wake. Exp Fluids 48:81–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0713-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang RF, Lee HW (1999) Effects of freestream turbulence on wing-surface flow and aerodynamic performance. J Aircraft 36(6):965–972. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rinoie K, Takemura N (2004) Oscillating behavior of laminar separation bubble formed on an aerofoil near stall. Aeronaut J 108(1081):153–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000000063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Z, Haan FL, Hui H (2007) An experimental investigation on the flow separation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil,. AIAA-2007-0275, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-275

  9. Kim D-H, Chang J-W, Chung J (2011) Low-Reynolds-number effect on aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA 0012 airfoil. J Aircraft 48(4):1212–1215. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Genç MS, Karasu İ, Açıkel HH (2012) An experimental study on aerodynamics of NACA2415 aerofoil at low Re numbers. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 39:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yarusevych S, Kawall JG, Sullivan PE (2003) Effect of acoustic excitation on airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 41(8):1599–1601. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yarusevych S, Sullivan PE, Kawall JG (2007) Effect of acoustic excitation amplitude on airfoil boundary layer and wake development. AIAA J 45(4):760–771. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.25439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricci R, Montelpare S, Silvi E (2007) Study of acoustic disturbances effect on laminar separation bubble by IR thermography. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 31(4):349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2005.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Genç MS, Lock G, Kaynak Ü (2008) An experimental and computational study of low Re number transitional flows over an aerofoil with leading edge slat. In: AIAA-2008-8877, 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, Alaska, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-8877

  15. Genç MS, Kaynak Ü, Yapici H (2011) Performance of transition model for predicting low Re aerofoil flows without/with single and simultaneous blowing and suction. Eur J Mech B Fluids 30(2):218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.11.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wahidi R, Bridges DH (2012) Effects of distributed suction on an airfoil at low Reynolds number. AIAA J 50(3):523–539. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodfellow SD, Yarusevych S, Sullivan P (2010) Low Reynolds number flow control over an airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. In: IMECE2010-39728, ASME 2010 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2010-39728

  18. Feero MA, Goodfellow SD, Lavoie P, Sullivan PE (2015) Flow reattachment using synthetic ject actuation on a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. AIAA J 53(7):2005–2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi J, Jeon WP, Choi HC (2002) Control of flow around an airfoil using Piezoceramic actuators. AIAA J 40(5):1008–1010. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Selig MS, Guglielmo JJ, Broeren AP, Giguere P (1996) Experiments on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA-96-0062, 34th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-62

  21. Nickerson JD (1986) A study of vortex generators at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA-86-0155, 24th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1986-155

  22. Kerho M, Hutcherson S, Blackwelder RF, Liebeck RH (1993) Vortex generators used to control laminar separation bubbles. J Aircraft 3:315–319. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.46336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seshagiri A, Cooper E, Traub LW (2009) Effects of vortex generators on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J Aircraft 46(1):116–122. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.36241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin JC (1992) Control of low-speed turbulent separated flow over a backward-facing ramp. Ph.D. Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

  25. Ashill PR, Fulker JL, Hackett KC (2001) Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs). In: AIAA-2001-0887, 39th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-887

  26. Griffin DA (1996) Investigation of vortex generators for augmentation of wind turbine power performance. Technical Report NREL/SR-440-21399, NREL

  27. Baldacchino D, Ferreira C, Tavernier DD, Timmer WA, van Bussel GJW (2018) Experimental parameter study for passive vortex generators on a 30% thick airfoil. Wind Energy 21:745–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. AGARD Working Group (1999) Standard: assessment of experimental uncertainty with application to wind tunnel testing. AIAA Standards/AIAA S-071A-1999, AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.473647

  29. Lin JC (1999) Control of turbulent boundary-layer separation using micro-vortex generators, AIAA-99-3404. In: 30th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, Norfolk, VA, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1999-3404

  30. Lin JC (2002) Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(4–5):389–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-0421(02)00010-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the New and Renewable Energy Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resources by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20153030023880).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Hung Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, HH., Kim, HY., Han, JS. et al. A Development and Assessment of Variable-Incidence Angle Vortex Generator at Low Reynolds Number of ~ 5×104. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 836–842 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0099-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0099-y

Keywords

Navigation