Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preventive Oral Treatment in Migraine: Efficacy and Dropout Rates Observed at a Tertiary Headache Center

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the short- and long-term effects of preventive treatment in a cohort of migraine patients, enlightening possible predictive factors for ineffectiveness and also analyzing the preventive’s dropout rates, clarifying the underlying reasons. This retrospective analysis included 210 patients who received a diagnosis of migraine without aura (MO), migraine with aura (MA), or chronic migraine (CM), according to ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria, with indication for prophylactic treatment. Three groups were defined and studied regarding the efficacy of oral preventives and dropout rates: group A referred to patients treated with a first preventive, group B with a second, and group C a third, respectively. Overall efficacy of our preventive treatment was low with 40% of patients improving with their first preventive. Also, successive prophylactic attempts were associated with progressively lower rates of efficacy. Patients in whom coexisted MOH (medication overuse headache) had lower rates of preventive inefficacy. The preventive’s dropout rates observed were also high (reaching 63.2% in subgroup C patients) with adverse drug reactions such as weight gain and cognitive dysfunction being the main reason for this. The modest effect of the oral preventive drugs as well as the high proportion of patients who dropped out due to drug side events confirms that in a significant proportion of patients, oral preventives can only delay a more focused therapeutic approach such as the new therapies with monoclonal CGRP antibodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) Disease burden and mortality estimates. 2018

  2. Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM, Pozo-Rosich P, Reuter U, de la Torre ER, Sanchez Del Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P. European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine : developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01130-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silberstein SD, Winner PK, Chmiel JJ. Migraine preventive medication reduces resource utilization. Headache. 2003;43(3):171–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03040.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21(4 Headache):973–89. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sprenger T, Viana M, Tassorelli C. Current prophylactic medications for migraine and their potential mechanisms of action. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(2):313–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-018-0621-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102410364676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edvinsson L. The journey to establish CGRP as a migraine target: a retrospective view. Headache. 2015;55:1249–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS. The American Headache Society Consensus statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2021;61(7):1021–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parreira E. Recomendações Terapêuticas Para Cefaleias da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cefaleias – 2021. Sinapse. 2021;21(supplement 1):3–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Antona L, Matharu M. Identifying and managing refractory migraine: barriers and opportunities? J Headache Pain. 2019;23:20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ford JH, Schroeder K, Buse DC, et al. Predicting initiation of preventive migraine medications: exploratory study in a large US medical claims database. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(1):51–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1657716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piccinni C, Cevoli S, Ronconi G, et al. A real-world study on unmet medical needs in triptan-treated migraine: prevalence, preventive therapies and triptan use modification from a large Italian population along two years. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1027-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. García-Azorin D, Santos-Lasaosa S, Gago-Veiga AB, Viguera Romero J, Guerrero-Peral AL. Real world preventative drug management of migraine among Spanish neurologists. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0971-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sacco S, Lampl C, Amin FM, Braschinsky M, Deligianni C, Uludüz D, Versijpt J, Ducros A, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P, Ornello R, Raffaelli B, Boucherie DM, Pozo-Rosich P, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair A, Maassen van den Brink A, Reuter U. European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack and of triptan failure. J Headache Pain. 2022;23(1):133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01502-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Headache Classification Subcommittee of International headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):24–36

  18. De Tommaso M, Delussi M. Failure of preventive treatments in migraine: an observational retrospective study in a tertiary headache center. SSRN Electron J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3566240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Steiner TJ, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, et al. Aids to management of headache disorders in primary care (2nd edition): on behalf of the European Headache Federation and Lifting The Burden: the Global Campaign against Headache. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0899-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener HC, Agosti R, Allais G, Bergmans P, Bussone G, Davies B, Ertas M, Lanteri-Minet M, Reuter U, Sánchez Del Río M, Schoenen J, Schwalen S, van Oene J; TOPMAT-MIG-303 Investigators Group. Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Dec;6(12):1054–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70272-7. Erratum in: Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jan;7(1):25.

  21. Sacco S, Cerone D, Carolei A. Comorbid neuropathologies in migraine: an update on cerebrovascular and cardiovascular aspects. J Headache Pain. 2008;9:237–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-008-0048-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulman EA, Lake AE 3rd, Goadsby PJ, Peterlin BL, Siegel SE, Markley HG, Lipton RB. Defining refractory migraine and refractory chronic migraine: proposed criteria from the refractory headache special interest section of the American headache society. Headache. 2008;48:778–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01132.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandenbussche N, Laterza D, Lisicki M, Lloyd J, Lupi C, Tischler H, Toom K, Vandervorst F, Quintana S, Paemeleire K, Katsarava Z. Medication-overuse headache: a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0875-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Weatherall MW. The diagnosis and treatment of chronic migraine. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015;6(3):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622315579627.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Boes CJ, Capobianco DJ. Chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache through the ages. Cephalalgia. 2005;25(5):378–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00868.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors were involved in the conception of the work and the acquisition, analysis an interpretation of data. A.F and S.M. were responsible for drafting of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content and agreement in all aspects related to the accuracy or integrity.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreia Ferreira.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee—Ethics and health commission of Hospital of Braga, Portugal.

Consent to Participate

Oral informed consent for inclusion in the study were obtained from all subjects.

Consent for Publication

All authors gave written and verbal informed consent for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medicine

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PNG 84 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, A., Marques, S.R., Lopes, S. et al. Preventive Oral Treatment in Migraine: Efficacy and Dropout Rates Observed at a Tertiary Headache Center. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 5, 38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-022-01369-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-022-01369-w

Keywords

Navigation