Abstract
I analyse the storylines identified by mathematics educators as representative of public perceptions of mathematics education. I consider these storylines in light of positioning theory’s focus on immanence and its emphasis on the negotiability of storylines, and in light of rhetorical devices associated with myths. Using a functionalist-informed orientation to the storylines, I ask what needs do they address. The article begins and ends with reflection on a specific incident of public interaction—a criticism of mathematics educators in online discussion of a news article. I consider different storylines for interpreting the criticism and encourage mathematics educators to pursue opportunities to change storylines.
Résumé
Dans cet article, j’analyse les récits identifiés par les éducateurs en mathématiques comme représentatifs des façons dont l’enseignement des mathématiques est perçu par le public. Je me penche sur ces récits et centre mon analyse théorique sur leur immanence et leur aspect négociable ou convenu, et je me sers de procédés rhétoriques associés aux mythes. J’applique aux récits une orientation fonctionnaliste, et je pose la question: quels besoins ces récits comblent-ils? L’article commence et se termine par une réflexion sur un incident spécifique d’interaction publique, une critique en ligne d’enseignants des mathématiques qui discutent d’un article publié dans les nouvelles. En particulier, je vise à prendre en considération les besoins de la personne qui fait la critique et à déterminer comment la reconnaissance de ces besoins est susceptible d’influencer ma réaction. Cette démarche me conduit à encourager les éducateurs en mathématiques à poursuivre activement les occasions qui pourraient faire modifier la teneur de ces récits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The special issue may be found at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education/special_issues/Dispelling_Myths_about_Mathematics
References
Abtahi, Y. & Barwell, R. (2017). Where are the children? An analysis of news media reporting on mathematics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, (vol. 2, pp. 359–360), Volos, Greece.
Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2018). Re-mythologizing mystery in mathematics: Teaching for open landscapes versus concealment. Education Sciences, 8(2), 41.
Anderson, R, Boaler, J., & Dieckmann, J. (2018). Achieving elusive teacher change through challenging myths about learning: A blended approach. Education Sciences, 8, 98.
Barthes, R. (1972/2009). Mythologies (trans., A. Lavers). London: Vintage Classics.
Chorney, S., Ng, O., & Pimm, D. (2016). A tale of two more metaphors: Storylines about mathematics education in Canadian national media. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 402–418.
Clements, D. & Sarama, J. (2018). Myths of early math. Education Sciences, 8, 71.
Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–51). Blackwell: Oxford.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (Third edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
Geertz, C. (1974). Myth, symbol and culture. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 191–206). New York: Oxford University Press.
Harré, R. & Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts (pp. 1–11). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Harré, R. & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Blackwell, Oxford.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., Johnson, K., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Sinclair, N., Chval, K. B., Clements, D. H., Civil, M., Pape, S. J., Stephan, M., Wanko, J. J., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2016). Positioning mathematics education researchers to influence storylines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 102–117.
Kollosche, D. (2018). Social functions of mathematics education: A framework for socio-political studies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 287–303
Lange T., & Meaney T. (2018). Policy production through the media: The case of more mathematics in early childhood education. In Jurdak M., Vithal R. (eds.) Sociopolitical dimensions of mathematics education. ICME-13 monographs. Dordrecht: Springer.
McFeetors, P. J., & McGarvey, L. M. (2018). Public perceptions of the basic skills crisis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0016-1
McGarvey, L. (2015). Basic facts about PISA 2012. In S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d’Étude en Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 57–63). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing 'good at maths'. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.
OECD. (2013) PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I). Pisa, OECD Publishing.
Reid, D. (2015). What have we not been hearing about PISA? In S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d’Étude en Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 65–69). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
Rodney, S., Rouleau, A., & Sinclair, N. (2016). A tale of two metaphors: Storylines about mathematics education in Canadian national media. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 389–401.
Savard, A. (2015). The performance of Québec students on PISA’s mathematics assessment: What’s going on in Québec? In S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d’Étude en Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 71–75). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
United Nations (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations. Available: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Blackwell: Oxford.
Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
Wagner, D. (2015). PISA reporting: Not saying what PISA is and does. In S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Meeting Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d’Étude en Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 77–80). Edmonton: CMESG/GCEDM.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.
Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2015). Positioning positioning theory in its application to mathematics education research. Positioning Theory Symposium, Bruges, Belgium. Paper available at: http://davewagner.ca//articles/Wagner_Herbel-Eisenmann_2015_positioning.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, D. Changing Storylines in Public Perceptions of Mathematics Education. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 19, 61–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-00039-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-00039-1