Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Design principles of youth development programs in outdoor environments: a scoping review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite increased popular and research interest in youth development and outdoor education, very little research has focused upon the design principles that enhance the effectiveness of these programs. This article presents a scoping review of the literature discussing youth development activities occurring in outdoor environments, in order to identify the design principles of effective activities. This review is based upon a literature search utilising A+ Education, ERIC, PsychINFO and SPORTDiscus and sought references published between 1990 and June 2019. The literature search yielded twenty-five references that met the selection criteria established for this review. The review discerned ten design principles of effective youth development occurring in outdoor environments. A number of opportunities for further theoretical and empirical research are highlighted within the review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, B., & Barber, B. (2007). Not just idle time: Adolescents' developmental experiences provided by structured and unstructured leisure activities. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 24(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0816512200029102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x11428813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beames, S., & Brown, M. (2016). Adventurous learning: A pedagogy for a changing world. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beames, S., Mackie, C., & Scrutton, R. (2018). Alumni perspectives on a boarding school outdoor education programme. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1557059.

  • Becker, P., Humberstone, B., Loynes, C., & Schirp, J. (Eds.). (2018). The changing world of outdoor learning in Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campione, J., Shapiro, A., & Brown, A. (1995). Forms of transfer in a community of learners: Flexible learning and understanding. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer (pp. 35–68). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Cason, D., & Gillis, H. (1994). A meta-analysis of adventure programming with adolescents. The Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382599401700109.

  • Catalano, R., Berglund, M., Ryan, J., Lonczak, H., & Hawkins, J. (2002). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Prevention & Treatment, 5(1), 1–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.515a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Sutton, I. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(1), 67–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (2003). Why have educational evaluators chosen not to do randomized experiments? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 114–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203254764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deane, K., & Harré, N. (2014). The youth adventure programming model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, C., Lund, C., & Flisher, A. (2011). A retrospective evaluation of a wilderness-based leadership development programme. South Africa Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631104100405.

  • Ewert, A. (1983). Outdoor adventure and self-concept: A research analysis. Eugene: Center of Leisure Studies, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garst, B., Scheider, I., & Baker, D. (2001). Outdoor adventure program participation impacts on adolescent self-perception. The Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400109.

  • Gillett, D., Thomas, G., Skok, R., & McLaughlin, T. (1991). The effects of wilderness camping and hiking on the self-concept and the environmental attitudes and knowledge of twelfth graders. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(3), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1991.10801966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D., & Larson, R. (2007). Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead roles, and adult-youth ratios. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Marsh, H., Neill, J., & Richards, G. (2016). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 43-87. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001043.

  • Lerner, R., von Eye, A., Lerner, J., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (2009). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin.

  • McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 67–90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, M. (2000). How are adventure education program outcomes achieved?: A review of the literature. JJournal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 5(1), 19–28.

  • McKenzie, M. (2003). Beyond the Outward Bound process: Rethinking student learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 26(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590302600104.

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, T., Kim, M., Tucker, A., & Alvarez, M. (2018). Learning through the adventure of youth sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1413708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T. (2009). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 9–36). Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povilaitis, V., & Tamminen, K. (2018). Delivering positive youth development at a residential summer sport camp. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33(4), 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417702478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S., & Gass, M. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming (2nd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, D., Sibthorp, J., Gookin, J., Annarella, S., & Ferri, S. (2017). Complementing classroom learning through outdoor adventure education: Out-of-school- time experiences that make a difference. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2017.1324313.

  • Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0702_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibthorp, J. (2003). Learning transferable skills through adventure education: The role of an authentic process. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 3(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729670385200331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibthorp, J. (2010). A letter from the editor: Positioning outdoor and adventure programs within positive youth development. The Journal of Experiential Education, 33(2), vi–ix. https://doi.org/10.5193/JEE33.2.vi.

  • Sibthorp, J., & Morgan, C. (2011). Adventure-based programming: Exemplary youth development practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibthorp, J., Furman, N., Paisley, K., Gookin, J., & Schumann, S. (2011). Mechanisms of learning transfer in adventure education: Qualitative results from the NOLS transfer survey. The Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.5193/JEE34.2.109.

  • Stott, T., Allison, P., Felter, J., & Beames, S. (2015). Personal development on youth expeditions: A literature review and thematic analysis. Leisure Studies, 34(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2013.841744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takano, T. (2010). A 20-year retrospective study of the impact of expeditions on Japanese participants. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2010.505707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, J. (2008). Components and characteristics of youth development programs: The voices of youth-serving policymakers, practitioners, researchers, and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 12(3), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690802199400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. (2009). Alternatives to randomized experiments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01656.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, A., & Mack, E. (2010). Inspiring courage in girls: An evaluation of practices and outcomes. The Journal of Experiential Education, 33(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.5193/jee33.2.166.

  • Williams, I., Rose, L., Raniti, M., Waloszek, J., Dudgeon, P., Olsson, C., et al. (2018). The impact of an outdoor adventure program on positive adolescent development: A controlled crossover trial. Journal of Outdoor & Environmental Education, 21(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0015-8.

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sydney School of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Andrew Mansfield, Wayne G. Cotton & Paul Ginns

Authors
  1. Andrew Mansfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wayne G. Cotton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Ginns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Mansfield.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansfield, A., Cotton, W.G. & Ginns, P. Design principles of youth development programs in outdoor environments: a scoping review. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 23, 241–260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00063-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00063-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation