Abstract
Many numerical computation methods have been devised and put to use in a variety of science and technology disciplines in the twenty-first century. Artificial neural networks (ANN) have recently gained popularity as a method for forecasting the compressive strength of concrete. This study is based on the prediction of the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete (a combination of Flyash and ground granulated blast furnace slag). The study used experimental data on compressive strength at 28 days. The ANN models were trained using a set of eight input parameters (say Flyash, GGBS, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, sodium hydroxide solution, sodium silicate, super-plasticizer and extra water) and one output parameter (say compressive strength). The model was trained using two different algorithms Levenberg–Marquardt (trainlm) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (trainscg). The training parameters for all the models were kept constant, either the model is trained using trainlm or trainscg. TANSIG and PURELIN are two transfer functions majorly used in model training. The comparison was done among the models trained using three different algorithms. The comparison was done based on the R-value (correlation coefficient), SSE, R2, and RSME. The research concluded that N7LM, the feed-forward backpropagation network trained using trainlm as the training function, TANSING (transfer function in hidden layer) and PURELIN (transfer function in the output layer) showed the best result. Whereas N2SCG gave the best result for which the training function is trainscg, the transfer function for both the hidden and output layer is TANSIG.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed in the research discussed in the manuscript.
References
Ahmaruzzaman, M. (2010). A review on the utilization of fly ash. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003
Ainie-Mat-Dom, A., et al. (2022). A review: GGBS as a cement replacement in concrete. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1022/1/012044
Albitar, M., et al. (2015). Effect of granulated lead smelter slag on strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 83, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.009
Azzahran Abdullah, S. F., et al. (2018). ‘Effect of alkali concentration on fly ash geopolymers. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/343/1/012013
Bernal, S. A., et al. (2011). Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag-metakaolin blends. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.004
Chengju, G. (1989). Maturity of concrete: method for predicting early-stage strength. ACI Materials Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/2099
Chi, M., & Huang, R. (2013). Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003
Chouksey, A., et al. (2022). An investigation on the effect of curing conditions on the mechanical and microstructural properties of the geopolymer concrete. Materials Research Express, 9(5), 55003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac6be0
Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37(8), 1633–1656.
Davidovits, J. (2023). Geopolymer chemistry and applications, 5th edition. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265076752.
de Medeiros, M. H. F., et al. (2017). Partial replacement and addition of fly ash in Portland cement: influences on carbonation and alkaline reserve. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-017-0023-z
Deb, P. S., Nath, P., & Sarker, P. K. (2014). The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Materials and Design, 62, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.001
Deb, P. S., & Sarker, P. K. (2016). Effects of ultrafine fly ash on setting strength, and porosity of geopolymers cured at room temperature. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533
Duxson, P., et al. (2007). Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z. Preprint.
Duxson, P., Lukey, G. C., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). Physical evolution of Na-geopolymer derived from metakaolin up to 1000 °C. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 3044–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0535-4
Gülşan, M. E., et al. (2019). Development of fly ash/slag based self-compacting geopolymer concrete using nano-silica and steel fiber. Construction and Building Materials, 211, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.228
Gupta, S. (2013). Using artificial neural network to predict the compressive strength of concrete containing nano-silica. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1(3), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2013.010306
Heidrich, C. (2002). Ash Utilisation-an Australian Perspective. http://www.flyash.info.
Kaveh, A., Gholipour, Y., & Rahami, H. (2008). Optimal design of transmission owers using genetic algorithm and neural networks. International Journal of Space Structure, 23(1), 1–20.
Kaveh, A., & Iranmanesh, A. (1998). Comparative study of backpropagation and improved counterpropagation neural nets in structural analysis and optimization. International Journal of Space Structure, 13(4), 177–185.
Kaveh, A., & Khalegi, H. (2000). Prediction of strength for concrete specimens using artificial neural networks. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2:1–13. https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/6859258 (Accessed: 17 Apr 2023).
Kaveh, A., & Khavaninzadeh, N. (2023). Efficient training of two ANNs using four meta-heuristic algorithms for predicting the FRP strength. Structures, 52(March), 256–272.
Kaveh, A., & Servati, H. (2001). Design of double layer grids using backpropagation neural networks. Computers & Structures, 79, 1561–1568.
Kumar, N., et al. (2023). Environmental concern in TPB model for sustainable IT adoption. International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 550, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16865-9_5
Kumar, R., et al. (2022). Influence of chloride and sulfate solution on the long-term durability of modified rubberized concrete. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.52880
Kumar, R., et al. (2023). Investigation of dry-wet cycles effect on the durability of modified rubberised concrete. Forces in Mechanics, 10, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmec.2023.100168
Kumar, R., Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2022a). Investigation of fresh, mechanical, and impact resistance properties of rubberized concrete. In: International e-Conference on Sustainable Development & Recent Trends in Civil Engineering, pp. 88–94.
Kumar, R., Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2022b). Investigation on the effect of seawater condition, sulphate attack, acid attack, freeze-thaw condition, and wetting-drying on the geopolymer concrete. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Civil Engineering Transactions of Civil Engineering, 46(4), 2823–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00767-9
Lee, S. C. (2003). Prediction of concrete strength using artificial neural networks. Engineering Structures, 25(7), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00004-X
Muliauwan, H. N., et al. (2020). Prediction of concrete compressive strength using artificial intelligence methods. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1625/1/012018
Oluokun, F. A., Harold Deatheridge, J., & Burdette, E. G. (1990). Early-age concrete strength prediction by maturity—another look. ACI Materials Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/2519
Palomo, A., Grutzeck, M. W., & Blanco, M. T. (1999). Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9. Preprint.
Panda, B., & Tan, M. J. (2018). Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing. Ceramics International, 44(9), 10258–10265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031
Popovics, S. (1998). History of a mathematical model for strength development of Portland cement concrete. Aci Materials Journal, 95, 593–600.
Purbasari, A., Samadhi, T. W., & Bindar, Y. (2018). The effect of alkaline activator types on strength and microstructural properties of geopolymer from co-combustion residuals of bamboo and kaolin. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 18(3), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.26534
Sanjuán, M. Á., & Argiz, C. (2021). Fineness of coal fly ash for use in cement and concrete. Fuels, 2(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels2040027
Snell, L. M., van Roekel, J., & Wallace, N. D. (1989). Predicting early concrete strength. Concrete International, 11, 43–47.
Upreti, K., et al. (2022). Prediction of mechanical strength by using an artificial neural network and random forest algorithm. Journal of Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7791582
Upreti, K., & Verma, M. (2022). Prediction of compressive strength of high-volume fly ash concrete using artificial neural network. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 1(December), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.55953/JERA.2022.2104
van Dao, D., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence approaches for prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060983
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2017). Review on effects of different parameters on behaviour of geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(6), 11276–11281. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0606210
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2020). Effect of superplasticiser on physical, chemical and mechanical properties of the geopolymer concrete. In: Second ASCE India Conference on ‘Challenges of Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure Development in Emerging Economies’ (CRSIDE2020), pp. 1183–1189.
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2018). Geopolymer concrete: A way of sustainable construction. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 5(1), 201–205.
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2021). Sodium hydroxide effect on the mechanical properties of flyash-slag based geopolymer concrete. Structural Concrete, 22(S1), E368–E379. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000068
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2022a). Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash ratio and the curing conditions on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. Structural Concrete, 23(4), 2015–2029. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000536
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2022b). Effect of liquid to binder ratio and curing temperature on the engineering properties of the geopolymer concrete. SILICON, 14(4), 1743–1757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-00985-w
Verma, M., & Dev, N. (2022c). Effect of SNF-based superplasticizer on physical, mechanical and thermal properties of the geopolymer concrete. SILICON, 14(3), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00840-4
Verma, M., Dev, N., et al. (2022b). Geopolymer Concrete: A material for sustainable development in Indian construction industries. Crystals, 12, 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040514
Verma, M., Upreti, K., et al. (2022a). Experimental analysis of geopolymer concrete: A sustainable and economic concrete using the cost estimation model. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7488254
Verma, M., Upreti, K., & Dadhich, P., et al. (2023b). Prediction of compressive strength of green concrete by artificial neural network. In: ICACIS 2022, pp. 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0_55.
Verma, M., Upreti, K., Khan, M. R., et al. (2023a). Prediction of compressive strength of geopolymer concrete by using random forest algorithm. ICACIS, 2022, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25088-0_14
Yazici, C., Hasan¸, H., & Arel, H. (2012). Effects of fly ash fineness on the mechanical properties of concrete¸SEMSI, S¯ adhan¯ a.
Yue, Z. X., & Chen, J. N. (2013). Fly ash the status of resource-oriented utilization in construction material. Advanced Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.753-755.628
Yunsheng, Z., & Wei, S. (2006). Fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Indian Concrete Journal, 80(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2005.11464946
Zhou, S., et al. (2020). Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Stabilized with Cement. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6410246
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by GLA University.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
US drafts the manuscript. NG specifies the technical works and MV provides the finishing touch in the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, U., Gupta, N. & Verma, M. Prediction of the compressive strength of Flyash and GGBS incorporated geopolymer concrete using artificial neural network. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 2837–2850 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00678-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00678-2