Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of different root-end cavity preparation techniques on root fracture resistance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Dental Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to examine how the various resection methods effect the root fracture resistance of the endodontic surgery.

Methods

A test for the fracture resistance was performed using forty extracted human teeth. The root canals were prepared with rotary instruments and obturated with cold lateral compaction of gutta percha + root canal sealer. Apical 3-mm portions of the roots were resected. While all roots were divided into three experimental groups, 10 roots were used for the control group. Retrograde cavities were prepared using slow-speed tungsten carbide round burs, ultrasonic retrotips, and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. All cavities were restored with MTA. Roots were embedded in acrylic resin-filled cylindrical molds until 2 mm beneath the cementoenamel junction. The force with a speed of 1 mm/min was applied vertically along the long axis of the tooth. Then, the highest fracture resistance of each tooth was measured in Newtons. The recorded data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests.

Results

According to the results, there was no statistically significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Root-end preparation methods had no effect on the fracture resistance of teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Society of Endodontology (2006) Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39:921–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Torabinejad M, Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR (1994) Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endod 20:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S, Burns RC (2002) Pathways of the pulp, 8th edn. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, p 102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Von Arx T, Walker WA III (2000) Microsurgical instruments for root end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review. Endod Dent Traumatol 16:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wuchenich G, Meadows TM (1994) A comparison between two root end preparation techniques in human cadavers. J Endod 20:279–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr GB (1997) Ultrasonic root end preparation. Dent Clin North Am 41:541–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yazdanfar I, Barekatain M, ZareJahromi M (2020) Combination effects of diode laser and resin-modified tricalcium silicate on direct pulp capping treatment of caries exposures in permanent teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 35:1849–1855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng X, Guan S, Lu H et al (2012) Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of Nd: YAG, Er: YAG, Er, Cr: YSGG laser radiation, and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in experimentally infected root canals. Lasers Surg Med 44(10):824–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto K, Wang X, Zhang C, Kinoshita JI (2007) Effect of a novel Er: YAG laser in caries removal and cavity preparation: a clinical observation. Photomed Laser Ther 25(1):8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammadi Z (2009) Laser applications in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 59(1):35–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Araki ÂT, Ibraki Y, Kawakami T, Lage-Marques JL (2006) Er:YAG laser irradiation of the microbiological apical biofilm. Braz Dent J 17:296–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van As G (2004) Erbium Lasers in dentistry. Dental Clin North Am 48:1017–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Winik R, Araki AT, Negrão JA et al (2006) Sealer penetration and marginal permeability after apicoectomy varying retrocavity preparation and retrofilling material. Braz Dent J 17:323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishizaki NT, Matsumoto K, Kimura Y et al (2004) Thermographical and morphological studies of Er;Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on root canal walls. Photomed Laser Surg 22:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller RJ (2004) Treatment of contaminated implant surfaces using the Er;Cr:YSGG laser. Implant Dent 13:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shetty D, Kailar A, Pare S et al (2020) The effect of root end cavity preparation using Er, Cr: YSGG laser, ultrasonic retrotip, and bur on the apical microleakage of retrograde cavity filled with MTA Plus. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 12(Suppl 1):299–303

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roghanizad N, Fekrazad R, Kalhori KA et al (2015) A comparison of Er, Cr: YSGG laser with ultrasonic preparation on the seal of retrograde cavities. Laser Ther 24(1):33–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Negi S, Adhikari HD, Mazumder D et al (2019) Comparative evaluation of microleakage after root-end resection by erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser and carbide bur with or without placement of mineral trioxide aggregate: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 22(4):391–395

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Koçak MM, Koçak S, Aktuna S et al (2011) Sealing ability of retrofilling materials following various root-end cavity preparation techniques. Lasers Med Sci 26:427–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Angiero F, Benedicenti S, Signore A et al (2011) Apicoectomies with the erbium laser: a complementary technique for retrograde endodontic treatment. Photomed Laser Surg 29(12):845–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franco EJ, Greghi SLA, Assis GFD (2005) Comparative evaluation of periodontal radicular therapies-conventional and Er:YAG laser-based on rat connective tissue response. Oral Sci 2005:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wallace JA (2006) Effect of Waterlase laser retrograde root-end cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices of extracted teeth as demonstrated by light microscopy. Aust Endod J 32(1):35–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayrancı F, Ayrancı LB, Özdoğan A et al (2018) Resistance to vertical root fracture of apicoected teeth using different devices during two root canal irrigation procedures. Lasers Med Sci 33:1685–1691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gondim E, Zaia AA, Gomes BP et al (2003) Investigation of the marginal adaptation of root end filling materials in root end cavities prepared with ultrasonic tips. Int Endod J 36:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F (2007) Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 33(2):81–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shinkai K, Takada M, Kawashima S et al (2019) Effects of the percentage of air/water in spray on the efficiency of tooth ablation with erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci 34:99–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tidmarsh BG, Arrowsmith MG (1998) Dentinal tubules at the roots end of apicected teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 22:184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gagliani M, Taschieri S, Molinari R (1998) Ultrasonic root-end preparation: influence of cutting angle on the apical seal. J Endod 24:726–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters CI, Peters OA, Barbakow F (2001) An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips. Int Endod J 34:142–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kokate SR, Pawar AM (2012) An in vitro comparative stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal seal between MTA, glass inomer cement & biodentine as root end filling materials using 1% methylene blue as tracer. Endod 24:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  31. Torabinejad M, Chivian N (1999) Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 25:197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kimura Y, Yu DG, Kinoshita JI et al (2001) Effects of erbium, chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root surface: morphological and atomic analytical studies. J Clin Las Med Surg 19(2):69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berbert FLCV, de Faria-Júnior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M et al (2010) An in vitro evaluation of apicoectomies and retropreparations using different methods. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110(4):e57–e63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ayranci F, Ayranci LB, Arslan H et al (2015) Assessment of root surfaces of apicected teeth: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Niger J Clin Pract 18(2):198–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Faria-Junior NB, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM et al (2009) Evaluation of ultrasonic and Er, Cr:YSGG laser retrograde cavity preparation. J Endod 35(5):741–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Shahi S et al (2010) Comparison of the effect of Er, Cr-YSGG laser and ultrasonic retrograde root-end cavity preparation on the integrity of root apices. J Oral Sci 52:77–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aydemir S, Cimilli H, Mumcu G, Chandler N, Kartal N (2014) Crack formation on resected root surfaces subjected to conventional, ultrasonic, and laser root-end cavity preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 32:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Romanos GE (2021) Advanced laser surgery in dentistry. John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection by Fatma Tunc and Mohammed Hussein and analyses were performed by Fatma Tunc. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Fatma Tunc and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma Tunç.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University Gaziantep (Code: 06.03.2019/386).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tunç, F., Hussein, M. Evaluation of different root-end cavity preparation techniques on root fracture resistance. Laser Dent Sci 7, 235–241 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-023-00202-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-023-00202-4

Keywords

Navigation