Abstract
Societies are characterized by a shared system of social norms, which promotes cooperation among people. However, following social norms often means going against self-interest—imagine, for example, being required to choose whether or not to get richer from an unfair deal; ignoring social norms, on the other hand, may elicit disruptive antisocial behaviors that damage human relationships. Therefore, this type of value-based decisions is particularly tough and requires a complex trade-off between self- and other-regarding motivations. The advancement in cognitive neuroscience has shed light on the mechanisms underlying social norm compliance, describing the interplay between the emotional, reward, and self-control systems in shaping social norm preference (Fehr and Camerer, Evolution and Human Behavior 25(2), 63–87, 2007). The modulation of these systems, in particular self-control areas like dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), through TMS and tDCS has proven to be effective in modifying people’s behavior in socio-economic contexts (Knoch et al., Science 314(5800), 829–832, 2006; Knoch et al., Cerebral Cortex 18(9), 1987–1990, 2008; Ruff et al., Science 342(6157), 482–484, 2013). The scope of the current paper is to discuss the potential benefits of the enhancement of social norm compliance in the context of therapeutic interventions, along with the issues of methodological, theoretical, and moral nature that may arise when considering the very definition of social norm: indeed, the benchmark for deciding what is right and what is wrong is not always easy to determine in the social context, and thus, the implications of proposing interventions aimed at modulating social norm compliance, although definitely promising, should also be considered carefully.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Baumgartner, T., Knoch, D., Hotz, P., Eisenegger, C., & Fehr, E. (2011). Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nature Neuroscience, 14(11), 1468–1474.
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: the nature and dynamics of social norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bicchieri, C. (2008). The fragility of fairness: an experimental investigation on the conditional status of pro-social norms. Philosophical Issues, 18, 229–248.
Birbaumer, N., Veit, R., Lotze, M., Erb, M., Hermann, C., Grodd, W., et al. (2005). Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(7), 799–805.
Blair, R. J. R. (2003). Neurobiological basis of psychopathy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 182(1), 5–7.
Blair, R. J. R. (2005). Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy. Development and Psychopathology, 17(03), 865–891.
Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., et al. (2012). Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimulation, 5(3), 175–195.
Buckholtz, J. W. (2015). Social norms, self-control, and the value of antisocial behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 122–129.
Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2009). Unforgettable ultimatums? Expectation violations promote enhanced social memory following economic bargaining. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 36. doi:10.3389/neuro.08.036.2009.
Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013). Great expectations: neural computations underlying the use of social norms in decision-making. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(3), 277–284.
Civai, C., Crescentini, C., Rustichini, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2012). Equality versus self-interest in the brain: differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 62(1), 102–112.
Contreras-Rodríguez, O., Pujol, J., Batalla, I., Harrison, B. J., Bosque, J., Ibern-Regàs, I., et al. (2014). Disrupted neural processing of emotional faces in psychopathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(4), 505–512.
Cornet, L. J., de Kogel, C. H., Nijman, H. L., Raine, A., & van der Laan, P. H. (2014). Neurobiological factors as predictors of cognitive–behavioral therapy outcome in individuals with antisocial behavior a review of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(11), 1279–1296.
Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Civai, C., Rumiati, R. I., & Fink, G. R. (2013). Disentangling self-and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 424–431.
Dambacher, F., Schuhmann, T., Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., Brugman, S., & Sack, A.T. (2015). Reducing proactive aggression through non-invasive brain stimulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nsv018.
Elster, J. (2009). Social norms and the explanation of behavior. In P. Hedström & P. Bearman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology (pp. 195–217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326(5952), 535–538.
Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87.
Gordon, H. L., Baird, A. A., & End, A. (2004). Functional differences among those high and low on a trait measure of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 56(7), 516–521.
Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: a case of diagnostic confusion. Psychiatric Times, 13(2), 39–40.
Harlé, K. M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion, 7(4), 876.
Iuculano, T., & Kadosh, R. C. (2013). The mental cost of cognitive enhancement. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(10), 4482–4486.
Kiehl, K. A., Smith, A. M., Hare, R. D., Mendrek, A., Forster, B. B., Brink, J., et al. (2001). Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 50(9), 677–684.
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832.
Knoch, D., Nitsche, M. A., Fischbacher, U., Eisenegger, C., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fehr, E. (2008). Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation—the example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 1987–1990.
Kuo, M. F., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A. (2014). Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. NeuroImage, 85, 948-960.
Ligneul, R, Obeso, I., Ruff, C., & Dreher, J.C. (2016). Dynamical representation of dominance relationships in the human medial prefrontal cortex. Current Biology, 26(23), 3107-3115.
Moretti, L., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2010). Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. Emotion, 10(2), 169.
Müller, J. L., Sommer, M., Wagner, V., Lange, K., Taschler, H., Röder, C. H., et al. (2003). Abnormalities in emotion processing within cortical and subcortical regions in criminal psychopaths: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using pictures with emotional content. Biological Psychiatry, 54(2), 152–162.
Rilling, J. K., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Pagnoni, G., Goldsmith, D. R., Elfenbein, H. A., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 61(11), 1260–1271.
Ruff, C. C., Ugazio, G., & Fehr, E. (2013). Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science, 342(6157), 482–484.
Sanfey, A. G. (2009). Expectations and social decision-making: biasing effects of prior knowledge on Ultimatum responses. Mind & Society, 8(1), 93–107.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19(4), 339–347.
ter Huurne, N., Fallon, S. J., van Schouwenburg, M., van der Schaaf, M., Buitelaar, J., Jensen, O., et al. (2015). Methylphenidate alters selective attention by amplifying salience. Psychopharmacology, 232(23), 4317–4323.
Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C. F., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature, 463(7284), 1089–1091.
van’t Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2005). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision-making. Neuroreport, 16(16), 1849–1852.
Veit, R., Flor, H., Erb, M., Hermann, C., Lotze, M., Grodd, W., et al. (2002). Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 328, 233–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Civai, C., Ma, I. The Enhancement of Social Norm Compliance: Prospects and Caveats. J Cogn Enhanc 1, 26–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0009-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0009-4