Abstract
Ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions (UPCs) offer unique opportunities to study processes under strong electromagnetic fields. In these collisions, highly charged fast-moving ions carry strong electromagnetic fields that can be effectively treated as photon fluxes. The exchange of photons can induce photonuclear and two-photon interactions and excite ions. This excitation of the ions results in Coulomb dissociation with the emission of photons, neutrons, and other particles. Additionally, the electromagnetic fields generated by the ions can be sufficiently strong to enforce mutual interactions between the two colliding ions. Consequently, the two colliding ions experience an electromagnetic force that pushes them in opposite directions, causing a back-to-back correlation in the emitted neutrons. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we qualitatively demonstrate that the above electromagnetic effect is large enough to be observed in UPCs, which would provide a clear means to study strong electromagnetic fields and their effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Kharzeev, R.D. Pisarski, M.H.G. Tytgat, Possibility of spontaneous parity violation in hot QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 512–515 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.512
X.G. Huang, Electromagnetic fields and anomalous transports in heavy-ion collisions—a pedagogical review. Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 076302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076302
F.Q. Wang, J. Zhao, Search for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29, 179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0520-z
J. Zhao, F. Wang, Experimental searches for the chiral magnetic effect in heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 200–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.05.001
R. Fang, R. Dong, D. Hou et al., Thermodynamics of the system of massive Dirac fermions in a uniform magnetic field. Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 091201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/38/9/091201
Y.C. Liu, X.G. Huang, Spin polarization formula for Dirac fermions at local equilibrium. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 272011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-1903-8
L. Adamczyk, J.K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev et al., Global \(\Lambda\) hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature 548, 62–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23004
J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, M. Zyzak et al., Methods for a blind analysis of isobar data collected by the STAR collaboration. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-021-00878-y
Y.C. Liu, X.G. Huang, Anomalous chiral transports and spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00764-z
J.H. Gao, G.L. Ma, S. Pu et al., Recent developments in chiral and spin polarization effects in heavy-ion collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-020-00801-x
C.A. Bertulani, S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 271–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526
S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, J. Seger et al., STARlight: a Monte Carlo simulation program for ultra-peripheral collisions of relativistic ions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 212, 258–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016
S. Klein, P. Steinberg, Photonuclear and two-photon interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 323–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923
G. Baur, K. Hencken, D. Trautmann, Photon-photon physics in very peripheral collisions of relativistic heavy ions. J. Phys. G 24, 1657–1692 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/24/9/003
S. Klein, J. Nystrand, Exclusive vector meson production in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 60, 014903 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.014903
C. Adler, Z. Ahammed, C. Allgower et al., Coherent \({\uprho}^{0}\) production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 272302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.272302
S. Afanasiev, C. Aidala, N.N. Ajitanand et al., Photoproduction of J/ \({\Uppsi}\) and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{\text {NN}}}\) = 200 GeV. Phys. Lett. B 679, 321–329 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061
B. Abelev, J. Adam, D. Adamová et al., Coherent \(J/\psi\) photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76\) TeV. Phys. Lett. B 718, 1273–1283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059
V. Khachatryan, et al., Coherent \(J/\psi\) photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} =\) 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment. Phys. Lett. B 772, 489–511 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001
M. Aaboud, G. Aad, B. Abbott et al., Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Nat. Phys. 13, 852–858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4208
J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J.R. Adams et al., Measurement of \(e^+e^-\) momentum and angular distributions from linearly polarized photon collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 052302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052302
M. Goldhaber, E. Teller, On nuclear dipole vibrations. Phys. Rev. 74, 1046–1049 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1046
B.L. Berman, S.C. Fultz, Measurements of the giant dipole resonance with monoenergetic photons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 713–761 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.47.713
P. Chomaz, N. Frascaria, Multiple phonon excitation in nuclei. Phys. Rep. 252, 275–405 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00079-I
A. Veyssiere, H. Beil, R. Bergere et al., Photoneutron cross sections of 208 Pb and 197 Au. Nucl. Phys. A 159, 561–576 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(70)90727-X
C. Tao, Y.G. Ma, G.Q. Zhang et al., Pygmy and giant dipole resonances by coulomb excitation using a quantum molecular dynamics model. Phys. Rev. C 87, 014621 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014621
W.B. He, Y.G. Ma, X.G. Cao et al., Giant dipole resonance as a fingerprint of \(\alpha\) clustering configurations in 12C and 16O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032506
B.S. Huang, Y.G. Ma, Dipole excitation of 6li and 9be studied with an extended quantum molecular dynamics model. Phys. Rev. C 103, 054318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054318
A.J. Baltz, S.R. Klein, J. Nystrand, Coherent vector meson photoproduction with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.012301
W.T. Deng, X.G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044907
A. Bzdak, V. Skokov, Event-by-event fluctuations of magnetic and electric fields in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B 710, 171–174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.02.065
L. Adamczyk et al., Coherent diffractive photoproduction of \(\rho ^{0}\)mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C 96, 054904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054904
J. Chen, D. Keane, Y.G. Ma et al., Antinuclei in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rep. 760, 1–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.07.002
K. Hattori, X.G. Huang, Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0178-3
R.D. Woods, D.S. Saxon, Diffuse surface optical model for nucleon-nuclei scattering. Phys. Rev. 95, 577–578 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.577
A.J. Baltz, Y. Gorbunov, S.R. Klein et al., Two-photon interactions with nuclear breakup in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 80, 044902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.044902
M. Broz, J.G. Contreras, J.D. Tapia Takaki, A generator of forward neutrons for ultra-peripheral collisions: \(\mathrm{n^O_On}\). Comput. Phys. Commun. 253, 107181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107181
M. Chiu, A. Denisov, E. Garcia et al., Measurement of mutual coulomb dissociation in \(\sqrt{{s}_{\rm NN}}130{\rm GeV}\)\(au+au\) collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.012302
B.I. Abelev, M.M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed et al., \(\rho ^0\) photoproduction in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}}\) = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 77, 034910 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034910
T. Nakamura, S. Shimoura, T. Kobayashi et al., Coulomb dissociation of a halo nucleus 11Be at 72A MeV. Phys. Lett. B 331, 296–301 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)91055-3
G. Baur, K. Hencken, A. Aste et al., Multiphoton exchange processes in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 729, 787–808 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.09.006
STAR ZDCsmd note. https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/files/ZDC-SMD.pdf
F. Tagliabue, J. Goldemberg, Angular distributions of fast photoneutrons. Nucl. Phys. 23, 144–152 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)90247-4
M. Bakhtiari, N.S. Jung, H.S. Lee, Contribution of compound, preequilibrium and direct reactions to photoneutron emission spectrum from various targets induced by 16.6-MeV monoenergetic photons. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 521, 38–46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2022.03.007
E.D. Courant, Direct photodisintegration processes in nuclei. Phys. Rev. 82, 703–709 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.703
M.B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Obložinský et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887–2996 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002
A.M. Poskanzer, S. Voloshin, Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. 58, 1671–1678 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671
B.W. Xiao, F. Yuan, J. Zhou, Momentum anisotropy of leptons from two photon processes in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 232301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.232301
H. Xing, C. Zhang, J. Zhou et al., The cos 2\(\phi\) azimuthal asymmetry in \(\rho ^{0}\) meson production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. JHEP 10, 064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)064
C. Zhang, Q.S. Dai, D.Y. Shao, Azimuthal decorrelation for photon induced dijet production in ultra-peripheral collisions of heavy ions. JHEP 23, 002 (2020). arXiv:2211.07071. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)002
X. Wu, X. Li, Z. Tang et al., Reaction plane alignment with linearly polarized photon in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042048 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.L042048
Z.T. Liang, X.N. Wang, Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301
X.N. Wang, Vector meson spin alignment by the strong force field. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 34, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-023-01166-7
J. Chen, Z.T. Liang, Y.G. Ma et al., Global spin alignment of vector mesons and strong force fields in heavy-ion collisions. Sci. Bull. 68, 874–877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.04.001
C. Adler, A. Denisov, E. Garcia et al., The RHIC zero degree calorimeter. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 470, 488–499 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00627-1
A.J. Baltz, M.J. Rhoades-Brown, J. Weneser, Heavy ion partial beam lifetimes due to Coulomb induced processes. Phys. Rev. E 54, 4233–4239 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.4233
L.A. Harland-Lang, Exciting ions: a systematic treatment of ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions with nuclear breakup. Phys. Rev. D 107, 093004 (2023). arXiv:2303.04826. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.093004
F. Krauss, M. Greiner, G. Soff, Photon and gluon induced processes in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 503–564 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(97)00049-5
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Fu-Qiang Wang, Dr. Si-Min Wang, and Dr. Shi Pu for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by JZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JZ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Yu-Gang Ma is the editor-in-chief and Jin-Hui Chen is an editorial board member for Nuclear Science and Techniques; they were not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Additional information
This work is supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2022YFA1604900), the Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (No. 2020B0301030008), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12275053, 12025501, 11890710, 11890714, 12147101, 12075061, and 12225502), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB34030000), Shanghai National Science Foundation (No. 20ZR1404100), and STCSM (No. 23590780100).
Appendix
Appendix
The probability of a UPC event associated with neutron emission (\(P_{x\text{n},x\text{n}}^\textrm{UPC}\)) is calculated as follows:
where \(P_{0H}(b)\) denotes the probability of having no hadronic interactions and \(P_{x\text{n},x\text{n}}(b)\) represents the probability of nuclear breakup with neutron emission in both colliding nuclei [12, 15, 37]. \(P_{0H}(b)\) is given by:
where \({\varvec{b}}\) is the two-dimensional impact parameter vector (with \(b=|{\varvec{b}}|\)) in the transverse plane, \(\sigma _{NN}\) is the total nucleon–nucleon interaction cross section, and \(T_{AA}\) is the overlap function. The number of nucleon–nucleon collisions follows a Poisson distribution with a mean of \(T_{AA}(b)\sigma _{NN}\). The nuclear thickness function \(T_{A}\) is calculated as follows:
where \(\rho\) corresponds to the Woods–Saxon functions in Eq. (4).
Assuming an independent nuclear breakup, \(P_{x\text{n},x\text{n}}(b)\) can be factorized as
Following the methodology of STARlight [12, 15, 29, 36], the probability of nuclear breakup with neutron emission (\(P_{x\text{n}}(b)\)) is given by
where \(\sigma _{\gamma A\rightarrow A^{*}+x\text{n}}\) is determined from experimental data [56, 57]. The photon flux is calculated using the Weizsäcker–Williams approach [12, 15, 58]
where k represents the photon energy, Z is the nuclear charge, \(K_{1}\) is the modified Bessel function, and \(x=kr_\perp /\gamma\). Figure 3 shows \(P_{0H}(b)\), \(P_{x\text{n},x\text{n}}(b)\), \(P_{x\text{n},x\text{n}}^\textrm{UPC}\) obtained from the simulation.
Figure 4 shows the calculation of the photon energy distribution in the target frame for a UPC event with neutron emissions.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, J., Chen, JH., Huang, XG. et al. Electromagnetic fields in ultra-peripheral relativistic heavy-ion collisions. NUCL SCI TECH 35, 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01374-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01374-9