Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced graph-based fault diagnostic system for nuclear power plants

Nuclear Science and Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scheduled maintenance and condition-based online monitoring are among the focal points of recent research to enhance nuclear plant safety. One of the most effective ways to monitor plant conditions is by implementing a full-scope, plant-wide fault diagnostic system. However, most of the proposed diagnostic techniques are perceived as unreliable by operators because they lack an explanation module, their implementation is complex, and their decision/inference path is unclear. Graphical formalism has been considered for fault diagnosis because of its clear decision and inference modules, and its ability to display the complex causal relationships between plant variables and reveal the propagation path used for fault localization in complex systems. However, in a graph-based approach, decision-making is slow because of rule explosion. In this paper, we present an enhanced signed directed graph that utilizes qualitative trend evaluation and a granular computing algorithm to improve the decision speed and increase the resolution of the graphical method. We integrate the attribute reduction capability of granular computing with the causal/fault propagation reasoning capability of the signed directed graph and comprehensive rules in a decision table to diagnose faults in a nuclear power plant. Qualitative trend analysis is used to solve the problems of fault diagnostic threshold selection and signed directed graph node state determination. The similarity reasoning and detection ability of the granular computing algorithm ensure a compact decision table and improve the decision result. The performance of the proposed enhanced system was evaluated on selected faults of the Chinese Fuqing 2 nuclear reactor. The proposed method offers improved diagnostic speed and efficient data processing. In addition, the result shows a considerable reduction in false positives, indicating that the method provides a reliable diagnostic system to support further intervention by operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Fujita, Learning from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident—a resilience point of view, in 2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEANES) (2012), pp. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299591

  2. V. Venkat, R. Raghunathan, Y. Kewen et al., A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part I: quantitative model-based methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27(3), 313–326 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00160-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Xie, X. Wang, K. Xie, SDG-based fault diagnosis and application based on reasoning method of granular computing, in IEEE Conf. Cont. Dec. (2010), pp. 1718–1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2010.5498443

  4. A. Ayodeji, Y.K. Liu, H. Xia, Knowledge-base operator support system for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis. Prog. Nucl. Energy 105, 42–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y.K. Liu, A. Ayodeji, Z.-B. Wen et al., A cascade intelligent fault diagnostic technique for nuclear power plants. J. Nuclear Sci. Technol. 55(3), 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1394228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Ayodeji, Y.K. Liu, SVR optimization with soft computing algorithms for incipient SGTR diagnosis. Ann. Nuclear Energy 121, 89–100 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.A. Kramer, B.L. Palowitch Jr., A rule-based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 33(7), 1067–1078 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690330703

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Zhang, C. Wu, B. Zhang et al., SDG multiple fault diagnosis by real-time inverse inference. Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(2), 173–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.008

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. G.H. Wu, Y.K. Liu, C.L. Xie, Research on fault diagnosis based on SDG-QTA in nuclear power plants. Atom. Energy Sci. Technol. 50(8), 1467–1473 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7538/yzk.2016.50.08.1467. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Smaili, R.E. Harabi, M.N. Abdelkrim, Design of fault monitoring framework for multi-energy systems using signed directed graph. IFACPapersOnline 50(1), 15734–15739 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.C. Brewster, F.F. Foucaud et al., The complexity of signed graph and edge-coloured graph homomorphisms. Discrete Math. 340(2), 223–235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2016.08.005

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. B. He, T. Chen, X. Yang, Root cause analysis in multivariate statistical process monitoring: Integrating reconstruction-based multivariate contribution analysis with fuzzy-signed directed graphs. Comput. Chem. Eng. 64, 167–177 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Chiaselotti, T. Gentile, F. Infusino, Granular computing on information tables: families of subsets and operators. Inf. Sci. 442, 72–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.046

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Butenkova, A. Zhukova, A. Nagoro et al., Granular computing models and methods based on the spatial granulation. Proc. Comput. Sci. 103, 295–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wang, M. Wei, Y. Feng, An iterative algorithm for least squares problem in quaternionic quantum theory. Comput. Phys. Commun. 179(4), 203–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.02.016

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Y.Y. Yao, Information granulation and rough set approximation. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16(1), 87–104 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-111X(200101)16:1%3C87:AID-INT7%3E3.0.CO;2-S

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Yao, Y. Zhao, Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf. Sci. 178(17), 3356–3373 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Y.K. Liu, G.H. Wu, C.L. Xie, A fault diagnosis method based on signed directed graph and matrix for nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Des. 297, 166–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T.Y. Lin, Granular computing on binary relations II: rough set representations and belief functions. Rough Sets Knowl. Discov. 1, 121–140 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. X. Hu, N. Cercone, Learning in relational databases: a rough set approach. Comput. Intell. 11(2), 323–337 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00035.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y.H. Cheng, C. Shih, S.C. Chiang et al., Introducing PCTRAN as an evaluation tool for nuclear power plant emergency responses. Ann. Nuclear Energy 40(1), 122–129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2011.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Kuo Liu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the project of State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment (No.K-A2019.418), the Foundation of Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory (HT-KFKT-14-2017003), the technical support project for Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute (SNPI) (No. 029-GN-B-2018-C45-P.0.99-00003), and the project of the Research Institute of Nuclear Power Operation (No. RIN180149-SCCG).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, YK., Ai, X., Ayodeji, A. et al. Enhanced graph-based fault diagnostic system for nuclear power plants. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0708-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0708-x

Keywords

Navigation