Abstract
The reactivity of a nuclear reactor is the most important safety and operating parameter. Due to short reactor period, the Light Water Reactor (LWR) designs require the compensations of rapid unfavorable reactivity increases. The increase in fuel or moderator temperature leads to compensate the reactivity jumps as inherent safety characteristics. The safe and reliable reactor operation requires the accurate assessment of these reactivity changes. This paper highlights the improvements in the methodology to determine the feedback reactivity changes in IAEA MTR benchmark. This method incorporates the reactivity effects of fuel temperature in moderator regions and vice versa. For this purpose, a detailed 3D model of the IAEA 10 MW MTR benchmark reactor is developed employing OpenMC computer code. OpenMC is a probabilistic computer code for neutronic calculations. This work uses temperature-dependent JEFF 3.2 cross-sectional library. The model is validated against the reference results of eigenvalues for control rods (inserted and in fully withdrawn position), control rod reactivity worth, averaged thermal flux in the central flux trap, and power fraction for each fuel element at beginning of life. The validated model is applied to simulate the feedback reactivity coefficients against the conventional reference results. In order to improve the methodology, the effect of the moderator temperature and void on fuel is incorporated to obtain a more realistic value of the fuel temperature coefficient. Similarly, the moderator temperature coefficient and void coefficient are improved by incorporating the coupling effects of fuel temperature on moderator. This methodology can be applied to improve the LWR designs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Geoden, N. Physics, R. Theory, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory (DOE-HDBK-1019, Continuing Education and Development Inc., Stony Point, 1993)
Y. Oka (ed.), Nuclear Reactor Design (Springer, Berlin, 2010), pp. 22–36
J.J. Duderstadt, L.J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis (Wiley, Hoboken, 1976), pp. 556–560
K.O. Ott, R.J. Neuhold, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Dynamics (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, 1985), pp. 316–321
J.R. Lamarsh, A.J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 3rd edn. (Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle, 2001), pp. 365–375
E.E. Lewis, Nuclear Power Reactor Safety (Wiley, Hoboken, 1977), pp. 170–185
R. Khan, T. Hamid, S. Bakhtyar, Feedback reactivity coefficients and their coupling. Nucl. Eng. Des. 237, 972–977 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.10.009
IAEA, Research Reactor Core Conversion from Use of High Enriched Uranium to Use Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Handbook, IAEA-TECDOC-233 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1980)
K.S. Chaudri, S.M. Mirza, Burnup dependent Monte Carlo neutron physics calculations of IAEA MTR benchmark. Prog. Nucl. Energy 81, 43–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.12.018
IAEA, Research Reactor Core Conversion Guidebook, IAEA-TECDOC-643 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1992)
A. Bousbia-Salah, H. Benkharfia, N. Kriangchaiporn et al., MTR benchmark static calculations with MCNP5 code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 35, 845–855 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.09.016
P.K. Romano, B. Forget, The OpenMC Monte Carlo particle transport code. Ann. Nucl. Energy 51, 274–281 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.06.040
M.J. Halsall, A Summary of WIMSD4 Input Options, AEEW-M 1327 (UKAEA, Dorchester, 1980)
T. Kulikowska, Reactor Lattice Codes (Institute of Atomic Energy, Swierk, 2000)
Los Alamos National Laboratory, A General Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) Transport Code (New Mexico, 2010). https://mcnp.lanl.gov/. Accessed 27 Aug 2017
Nuclear Energy Agency, JEFF-3.2 Evaluated Data Library—Neutron Data (2016). http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbforms/data/eva/evatapes/jeff_32/. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
R.L. Burden, J.D. Faires, Numerical Analysis, 9th edn. (Cengage Learning, Boston, 2011), pp. 173–190
S.C. Chapra, R.P. Canale, Numerical Methods for Engineers, 7th edn. (McGraw Hill, New York City, 2010), pp. 655–660
S-u-I. Ahmad, N. Ahmad, Effect of Updated WIMSD libraries on neutron energy spectrum at irradiation site of PARR-1 using 3D modeling. Ann. Nucl. Energy 32, 521–548 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2004.11.007
T. Hamidouche, A. Bousbia-Salah, E.K. Si-Ahmed et al., Application of coupled code technique to a safety analysis of a standard MTR research reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 239, 2104–2118 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.06.002
T.M. Sembiring, L.P. Hong, Validation of Batan’s standard diffusion codes in IAEA benchmark static calculations. Atom Indonesia 23, 73–91 (1997)
R. Khan, Muhammad Rizwan Ali, F. Qayyum et al., Improvements in the determination of reactivity coefficients of PARR-1 reactor, in Proceedings of Research Reactor Fuel Management (RRFM) (Netherlands, 2017). https://www.euronuclear.org/meetings/rrfm2017/proceedings.htm
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Department of Nuclear Engineering (DNE) and PIEAS for providing computational resources in the Advanced Computational Reactor Engineering (ACRE) lab.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qayyum, F., Ali, M.R., Zahur, A. et al. Improvements in methodology to determine feedback reactivity coefficients. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0588-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0588-0