Abstract
Selection of the best interpolation method as well as the appropriate software parameters that give the closest approximation to known geology is usually a difficult task. This is because geologic factors such as lithologic and structural feature occurrences are not easily predictable, especially where outcrop occurrences are fortuitous. Borehole data provides an alternative to sparse outcrops especially in areas where the borehole occurrence is well-distributed. However, most boreholes were drilled for exploration purposes and may not be well-distributed over all the study areas. Getting information in-between boreholes becomes a big challenge, especially in areas where we have very large volume of borehole data that are randomly distributed. The use of interpolation technique to estimate in-between borehole points becomes imperative. Comparison of interpolation techniques was carried out with borehole log data so as to determine the best interpolation method output that is closest to known geology. The test area is located in the southwestern part of the Western Bushveld Complex and the northeastern part of the Eastern Bushveld Complex in South-Africa. Eight interpolation tools available in Rockworks® 15 were evaluated and utilized in contouring the major stratigraphic peaks within the area. The best results were achieved with Kriging and trend surface analysis interpolation methods. The resultant maps were interpreted and compared with geology and structures inferred from existing geological and geophysical records and a good correlation is present.
References
Wu, Q., Xu, H., & Zou, X. (2005). An effective method for 3D geological modeling with multi-source data integration. Computers & Geosciences, 31(1), 35–43.
Mei, S. (2009). Geologist-controlled trends versus computer-controlled trends: Introducing a high-resolution approach to subsurface structural mapping using well-log data, trend surface analysis, and geospatial analysis. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 46, 309–329.
Bamisaiye, O. A., Eriksson, P. G., Van Rooy, J. L., Brynard, H. M., Foya, S., & Nxumalo, V., et al. (2014). Three dimensional geometry of the Rustenburg Layered Suite, South Africa. Canadian Journal of Tropical Geography/Revue canadienne de géographie tropicale [Online]. Vol. (2) 1. pp. 1–15. http://laurentian.ca/cjtg. Accessed 5 May 2015.
Wang, G., & Huang, L. (2011). 3D geological modeling for mineral resources assessment of the Tongshan Cu deposit, Heilongjiang Province, China. Geosciences Frontiers, 3(4), 483–491.
Muzik, J., Vondrackova, T., Sitanyiova, D., Plachy, J., & Nyvlt, V. (2015) Creation of 3D geological model using interpolation methods for numerical modelling. In World multidisciplinary earth sciences symposium, WMESS 2015 (Vol. 15, pp. 25–30). Procedia Earth and Planetary Science.
Dag, A., & Ozdemir, A. C. (2013). A comparative study for 3D surface modeling of coal deposit by spatial interpolation approaches. Resource Geology, 63(4), 394–403.
Mei, G. (2014). Summary on several key techniques in 3D geological modeling. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/723832.
Kaufmann, O., & Martin, T. (2008). 3D geological modelling from boreholes, cross-sections and geological maps, application over former natural gas storages in coal mines. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 278–290.
Chilès, J. P., Aug, C., Guillen, A., & Lees, T. (2004). Modelling the geometry of geological units and its uncertainty in 3D from structural data: the potential-field method. In Proceedings of international symposium on orebody modelling and strategic mine planning, Perth, Australia (Vol. 22, p. 24).
Calcagno, P., Chilès, J. P., Courrioux, G., & Guillen, A. (2008). Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 171, 147–157.
McInerney, P., Goldberg, A., Calcagno, P., Guillen, R., & Seikel, R. (2007). Improved 3D geology modelling using an implicit function interpolator and forward modelling of potential field data. In Milkereit, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of exploration 07: Fifth decennial international conference on mineral exploration (pp. 919–922).
Aguilar, F. J., Agüera, F., Aguilar, M. A., & Carvajal, F. (2005). Effects of terrain morphology, sampling density, and interpolation methods on grid DEM accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71, 805–816.
Handcock, M. S., & Wallis, J. R. (1994). An approach to statistical spatial-temporal modeling of meterological fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(426), 368–378.
Weng, Q. (2006). An evaluation of spatial interpolation accuracy of elevation data. In A. Riedl, W. Kainz, & G. A. Elmes (Eds.), Progress in spatial data handling (pp. 805–824). Berlin: Springer.
Li, J. & Heap, A. D. (2008). A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23, Canberra.
Guarneri, J. C., & Weih, R. C., Jr. (2012). Comparing methods for interpolation to improve raster digital elevation models. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 66, 77–81.
Journel, A. G. (1989). Fundamentals of geostatistics in five lessons. In Bibliography: P. 1. Geology-statistical methods. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
Li, J., & Heap, A. D. (2011). A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors. Ecological Informatics, 6(6), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003.
Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bamisaiye, O. A. (2015). Geo-spatial mapping of the Western Bushveld Rustenburg Layered Suite (Rls) in South Africa. Journal of Geography and Geology, 7(4), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v7n4p88.
Bamisaiye, O. A., Eriksson, P. G., Van Rooy, J. L., Brynard, H. M., Foya, S., & Nxumalo, V. (2017). Subsurface mapping of Rustenburg Layered Suite (RLS), Bushveld complex, South Africa: Inferred structural features using borehole data and spatial analysis. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 132, 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afrearsci.2017.05.003.
Gringarten, E., & Deutsch, C. V. (2001). Teacher’s aide variogram interpretation and modeling. Mathematical Geology, 33(4), 28.
Chilès, J. P., & Delfiner, P. (1999). Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. New York: Wiley.
Rockware. (2016). Rockworks17 software help. Boulder, CA.
Wackernagel, H. (2013). Multivariate geostatistics: An introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer.
Clark I., Harper W.V. (2000) Practical geostatistics: Alloa. In Escocia. Geostokos Limited.
Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation (p. 512). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stark, P. B. (1997). Earthquake prediction: The null hypothesis. Geophysical Journal International, 131, 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb06593.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of the author, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bamisaiye, O.A. Subsurface mapping: selection of best interpolation method for borehole data analysis. Spat. Inf. Res. 26, 261–269 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0170-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-018-0170-6