Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How international curricula effectively challenge and counteract the negative effects of authoritarian education policies: a case of Poland

  • Research article
  • Published:
Curriculum Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study delves into the educational functions of the International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum within the framework of the prevailing authoritarian education policy in Poland. The primary objective is to comprehend the motivations driving teachers to transition to the IB curriculum and to delineate the specific functions fulfilled by the IB curriculum within this authoritarian context. The findings suggest that the authoritarian policy of education in Poland is marked by centralized control, reduction of autonomy, restrictions on academic freedom, the politicization of education, suppression of dissent, lack of transparency, and political interference. This has led to a decline in the quality of education in Poland and a rise in dissatisfaction particularly among teachers, who have experienced a decline in the level of autonomy and control they are able to exercise over their teaching. In conclusion, the study revealed that teachers in Poland continue to experience challenges and negative experiences due to the authoritarian policy of education. However, their experiences have also revealed their resilience and commitment to their work, and their decision to teach according to international curricula has provided them with a sense of empowerment and agency in the education system. The study profiles the three main educational functions performed by the international curricula under the current authoritarian education policy: providing autonomy in teaching, bridging the gap between national and international curricula to expand professional skills and knowledge, and supporting professional collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Diagram 1
Diagram 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikman, R., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(4), 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.

  • Amnå, E. (2012). How is civic engagement developed over time? Emerging answers from a multidisciplinary field. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 611–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39, 31–42.

  • Beachum, F., & Dentith, A. M. (2004). Teacher leaders: Creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. The Educational Forum, 68, 270–279.

  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325

  • Blaydes, L. (2011). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochsler, D., & Juon, A. (2020). Authoritarian footprints in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics, 36(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1698420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., & Hanley, S. (2018). Rethinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – Looking beyond Hungary and Poland. East European Politics, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1491401

  • Collay, M. (2006). Discerning professional identity and becoming bold, socially responsible teacher-leaders. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development.

  • Cribb, A., & Gewirtz, S. (2007). Unpacking autonomy and control in education: Some conceptual and normative groundwork for a comparative analysis. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (2015). Social diagnosis: Objective and subjective quality of life in Poland. Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1956). Education and sociology. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). Education and training monitor 2018: Poland. Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Eurydice Report. (2023). National reforms in school education (europa.eu) https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-education-systems/poland/national-reforms-school-education. Accessed 16 Apr 2023.

  • Fernandes, J. V. (1988). From the Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction to the Theory of Resistance. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2), 169–180.

  • Friedman, L. J. (1999). Identity's architect: A biography of Erik H. Erikson. Scribner/Simon & Schuster.

  • Frostenson, M. (2015a). Teacher autonomy in the context of educational governance: A conceptual analysis. Educational Policy, 29(3), 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M. (2015b). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalization of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives: Studies in education and change. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudzińska-Gross, I. (2014). The backsliding. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 28(4), 664–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414553886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2004). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction.

  • Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBO Facts and Figures. (2023). www.ibo.org. Accessed 17 Oct 2023.

  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

  • Kochenov, D. (2008). EU enlargement and the failure of conditionality: Pre-accession conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law. Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopińska, V. (2020). The concept of citizenship in the Polish school education: Political change and the change of core curricula. Discourse Analysis, Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 1(30), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotwas, M., & Kubik, J. (2019). Symbolic thickening of public culture and the rise of right-wing populism in Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 435–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Król, M. (2015). Byliśmy głupi [We were foolish]. Wydawnictwo Czerwone i Czarne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwieciński, Z. (2014). Edukacja demokratyczna i humanistyczna jako ruch i dzieło społeczne [Democratic and humanistic education as a social movement and undertaking]. Studia Edukacyjne, 30, 7–37. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/bitstream/10593/12289/1/art01_kwieci%C5%84ski.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2023.

  • LaPointe-McEwan, D., DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2017). Supporting evidence use in networked professional learning: the role of the middle leader. Educational Research, 59, 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1304346

  • Leek J. (2019). Decentralization policies concerning leadership of parents and students in school councils in Poland. From autocracy to democracy within the state monopoly. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1643501

  • Leek, J. (2022). From educational experiment to an alternative to the national programme. International Baccalaureate Programmes in Poland – policy and practice perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(3), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1777842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magyar, B., & Madlovics, B. (2020). The anatomy of post-communist regimes: A conceptual framework. Central European University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? Peter Lang.

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (2008). Teacher learning for new times: Repurposing new multimodal literacies and digital-video composing for schools. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (Vol. II, pp. 441–460). Lawrence Earlbaum & International Reading Association.

  • Noble B. (2020). Authoritarian amendments: Legislative institutions as intraexecutive constraints in post-Soviet Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), 1417–1454.

  • Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172–178.

  • Pepinsky, T. (2014). The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, T., & Pospieszna, P. (2021). Democracy promotion in times of autocratization: The case of Poland, 1989–2019. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(6), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, T., Vauras, M., Laakkonen, E., Kinnunen, R., Volet, S. (2019). High school students’ perceptions of affect and collaboration during virtual science inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 334–348.

  • Pospieszna, P., Lown, P., & Dietrich, S. (2023). Building active youth in post-Soviet countries through civic education programs: Evidence from Poland. East European Politics, 39(2), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2102608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, T. F. (2019). Institutional change in authoritarian regimes: Pension reform in Russia and China. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(5), 301–314.

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2014). Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession. JCMS; Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennet, R. (1974). The fall of public man. Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16, 584–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Śliwerski B. (2013). Diagnoza uspołecznienia publicznego szkolnictwa III RP w gorsecie centralizmu. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.

  • Śliwerski B. (2015). Edukacja (w)polityce. Polityka (w)edukacji. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.

  • Śliwerski, B. (2016). Quo vadis Polish Education? International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 5(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śliwerski, B. (2017). The right of a child to its rights. Pedagogika Społeczna, 4, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śliwerski, B. (2019). Does the education system in Poland correspond with modern education and standards in the EU?. In: D. Sax, A. Król, & J. Wilkin (Eds.), Poland in the European Union: achievements, problems & prospects (pp. 45–51). Polska Akademia Nauk.

  • Śliwerski, B. (2020a). Crisis of democracy and education reforms in Poland after 30 years of political transformation. Resocjalizacja Polska - Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation, 19, 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śliwerski, B. (2020b). (Kontr-)rewolucja oświatowa. Studium z polityki prawicowych reform edukacyjnych [In English: Educational (counter-) revolution. A Study of the Politics of Right-wing Educational Reforms]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

  • Smith, R., & Erdoğan, S. (2008). Teacher-learner autonomy: Programme goals and student-teacher constructs. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities and responses. Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M., & Levinson, B. A. U. (2000). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnerton, J. (2007). Brokers and boundary crossers in an urban school district: Understanding central-office coaches as instructional leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 195.

  • Szafraniec K. (2012). Dojrzewający obywatele dojrzewającej demokracji. O stylu politycznej obecności młodych. Instytut Obywatelski. https://docplayer.pl/6603146-Dojrzewajacy-obywatele-dojrzewajacej-demokracji.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2023.

  • Utley, B. L., Rhodes, L. K. & Basile, C. G. (2003). Walking in two worlds: master teachers serving as site coordinators in partner schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 515–528.

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

  • Wermke, J., & Forsberg, L. (2017). Teacher autonomy and collaboration in Swedish schools: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss J., Bales S., Christmas-Best V., Diversi M., McLaughlin M., Silbereisen R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 121–148.

  • Ziółkowski, M. (2015). Teoria socjologiczna a transformacja społeczeństwa polskiego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The inspiration to write this paper came from the research work we undertook as part of the project entitled “Comparative study on functions of international programmes in Poland” (grant number 2020/38/E/HS6/00048), financed by the National Science Centre Poland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

    Joanna Leek

  2. The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland

    Boguslaw Sliwerski

Authors
  1. Joanna Leek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Boguslaw Sliwerski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Leek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leek, J., Sliwerski, B. How international curricula effectively challenge and counteract the negative effects of authoritarian education policies: a case of Poland. Curric Perspect (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00225-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00225-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation