Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of rank correlations in curvilinear relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cases where only linear relationships are suspected, Pearson’s correlation is generally used to measure the strength of the association between variables. It is well-known, however, that when a non-linear or non-linearizable connection exists, the use of Pearson’s coefficient on original values can be deceiving. On the other hand, rank correlations should perform satisfactorily because of their properties and versatility. There are many coefficients of rank correlation, from simple ones to complicated definitions invoking one or more special transformations. Each of these methods is sensitive to a different feature of dependence between variables The purpose of this article is to find a coefficient, if one exists, that tends to be different from zero at least in a meaningful way more often than others when the relationship between two rankings is of a non linear type. In this regard, we analyze the behavior of a few well-known rank correlation coefficients by focusing on some frequently encountered non-linear patterns. We conclude that a reasonably robust answer to the special needs arising from non-linear relationships could be given by a variant of the Fisher–Yates coefficient, which has a more marked tendency to reject the hypothesis of independence between pairs of rankings connected by several forms of non-linear interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amerise IL, Tarsitano A (2016) A new symmetrical test of bivariate independence (under review)

  • Amerise IL, Marozzi M, Tarsitano A (2016) pvrank: Rank correlations. R package version 1.1.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pvrank

  • Barton DE, Mallows CL (1965) Some aspects of the random sequence. Ann Math Stat 36:236–260

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat DN, Nayar SK (1997) Ordinal measures for visual correspondence. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Francisco (CA, USA), 18–20 June 1996, pp 351–357

  • Blomqvist N (1950) On a measure of dependence between two random variables. Ann Math Stat 21:593–600

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borroni CG (2013) A new rank correlation measure. Stat Pap 54:255–270

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borroni CG, Zenga M (2007) A test of concordance based on Gini’s mean difference. Stat Methods Appl 16:289–308

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron PJ, Wu T (2010) The complexity of the weight problem for permutation and matrix groups. Electron Notes Discret Math 28:109–116

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Campano F, Salvatore D (1988) Economic development, income inequality and Kuznets’ U-shaped hypothesis. J Policy Model 10:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow DE (1986) A unified approach to constructing nonparametric rank tests. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Purdue University, Indiana, 86-15. Available at http://www.stat.purdue.edu/docs/research/tech-reports/1986/tr86-15.pdf

  • Dallal GE, Hartigan JA (1980) Note on a test of monotone association insensitive to outliers. J Am Stat Assoc 75:722–725

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis P, Graham RL (1977) Spearmans footrule as a measure of disarray. J R Stat Soci B 39:262–268

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fieller EC, Pearson ES (1961) Tests for rank correlation coefficients: II. Biometrika 48:29–40

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Filliben JJ (1975) The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 17:111–117

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Yates F (1938) Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research, 5th edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Plante J-F (2003) On Blest’s measure of rank correlation. Can J Stat 31:35–52

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gideon RA, Hollister A (1987) A rank correlation coefficient resistant to outliers. J Am Stat Assoc 82:656–666

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gini C (1914) Di una misura delle relazioni tra le graduatorie di due caratteri. Tipografia Cecchini, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AD (1979a) A measure of the agreement between rankings. Biometrika 66:7–15

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AD (1979b) Another measure of the agreement between rankings. Biometrika 66:327–332

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek J, Šidak Z, Sen PK (1999) Theory of rank tests, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hamming RW (1950) Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell Syst Tech J 29:147–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffding W (1948) A non-parametric test of independence. Ann Math Stat 19:546–557

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H, Pabst MR (1936) Rank correlation and tests of significance involving no assumption of normality. Ann Math Stat 7:29–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny JG (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88:577–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:91–93

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • King TS, Chinchilli VM (2001) Robust estimators of the concordance correlation coefficient. J Biopharm Stat 11:83–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth DE (1973) The art of computer programming, 2nd edn. Vol 1: Fundamental algorithms. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading

  • Lieberson S (1964) Limitations in the application of non-parametric coefficients of correlation. Am Sociol Rev 29:744–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mango A (2006) A distance function for ranked variables: a proposal for a new rank correlation coefficient. Metodološki Zvezki 3:9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard SP (2013) EnvStats: an R package for environmental statistics. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GH, Wallis AW (1943) Time series significance test based on sign differences. J Am Stat Assoc 38:153–165

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1950) A curvilinear ranking test. J R Stat Soc B 12:292–295

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Niewiadomska-Bugaj M, Kowalczyk T (2006) A new test of association and other tests based on the Gini mean difference. Metron 64:399–409

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peters CC (1946) A new descriptive statistic: the parabolic correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 11:57–69

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rényi A (1959) On measures of dependence. Acta Math Hung 10:441–451

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salama IA, Quade D (1997) The asymptotic normality of a rank correlation statistic based on rises. Stat Probab Lett 32:201–205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salama IA, Quade D (2001) The symmetric footrule. Commun Stat Part A Theory Methods 30:1099–1109

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Salvemini T (1951) Sui vari indici di concentrazione. Statistica 2:133–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarndäl CE (1974) A comparative study of association measures. Psychometrika 39:165–187

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scarsini M (1984) On measures of dependence. Stochastica 8:201–218

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer B, Wolff EF (1981) On nonparametric measures of dependence for random variables. Ann Stat 9:879–885

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shaper AG, Wannamethee G, Walker M (1988) Alcohol and mortality in British men: explaining the U-shaped curve. Lancet 2:1267–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psichol 15:72–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman C (1906) “Footrule” for measuring correlation. Br J Psychol 2:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugano O, Watadani S (1993) An association analysis based on a statistic orthogonal to linear rank statistics. Behaviormetrica 29:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitano A, Amerise LI (2015) On a new measure of rank-order association. J Stat Econom Methods 4:83–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarsitano A, Lombardo R (2013) A coefficient of correlation based on ratios of ranks and anti-ranks. Jahrnbucher fr Nationalkonomie und Statistik 233:206–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H (1950) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. Part 3. Proceedings of Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenenschappen 53:1397–1412

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ulam SM (1961) Monte Carlo calculations in problems of mathematical physics. In: Beckenbach F (ed) Modern mathematics for the engineer: second series. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanniski J (1978) Taxes, revenues, and the ‘Laffer curve’. Public Interest 50:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield JW (1950) Uses of the ranking method in psychology. J R Stat Soc Ser B 12:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18:459–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zayed H, Quade D (1997) On the resistance of rank correlation. J Stat Comput Simul 48:59–81

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agostino Tarsitano.

Additional information

Communicated by: Michel van de Velden.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarsitano, A., Amerise, I.L. Effectiveness of rank correlations in curvilinear relationships. Behaviormetrika 44, 351–368 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-017-0020-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-017-0020-1

Keywords

Navigation