Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of globalisation processes on supply chain management

  • Practice-oriented Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The functioning and proliferation of global value chains are becoming increasingly important in supply chain management operations. The study aims to identify the drivers of value-added growth as a key indicator of effective global supply chain management. This study provides an opportunity to compare the most influential factors of successful supply chain management through the prism of value added in Russia, China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, and the USA. A comparative economic-mathematical analysis of the influence of variables determining the degree of a country’s inclusion in global value chains was conducted. On this basis, it was proved that the IT sphere can become a competitive advantage for Russia and a prerequisite for inclusion in global value chains. Based on the assessment of supply chain management effectiveness in the context of inclusion in global value chains, it is found that the effectiveness of countries’ participation in them is determined by several drivers. Within the framework of global value chains, there is a change in the mechanism of international competition, in which each of the participants of global chains is interested in the efficiency and success of partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available on request.

References

  1. Free C, Hecimovic A (2021) Global supply chains after COVID-19: the end of the road for neoliberal globalisation? Account Audit Account J 34(1):58–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saxena A, Yadav AK (2022) Examining the Effect of COVID-19 on rail freight volume and revenue using the ARIMA forecasting model and assessing the resilience of Indian railways during the pandemic. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(6):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanov D (2020) Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03640-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanov D (2021) Exiting the COVID-19 pandemic: after-shock risks and avoidance of disruption tails in supply chains. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04047-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gudgin G, Coutts K, Gibson N, Buchanan J (2018) The macro-economic impact of Brexit: using the CBR macro-economic model of the UK economy (UKMOD). J Self-Gov Manag Econ 6(2):7–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magableh GM (2021) Supply chains and the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive framework. Eur Manag Rev 18(3):363–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lavelli V (2021) Circular food supply chains–impact on value addition and safety. Trends Food Sci Technol 114:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Epede MB, Wang D (2022) Global value chain linkages: an integrative review of the opportunities and challenges for SMEs in developing countries. Int Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.101993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deloitte (2021) Tracking the trends 2021. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/energy-resources/Russian/RU_Tracking-the-trends-2021_final.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  10. ILC (2016) Resolution concerning decent work in global supply chains. https://www.ilo.org/moscow/dw4sd/themes/supply-chains/lang--ru/index.htm. Accessed 25 June 2021.

  11. Centobelli P, Cerchion R, Esposito E (2020) Evaluating environmental sustainability strategies in freight transport and logistics industry. Bus Strategy Environ 29(3):1563–1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF globalisation index–revisited. Rev Int Organ 14:543–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. UNDP (2020) Globalization. https://www.un.org/ru/youthink/globalization.shtml. Accessed 25 June 2021

  14. Hu J, Haddud A (2020) Exploring the impact of globalization and technology on supply chain management: a case of international e-commerce business. In: Supply chain and logistics management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 1353–1576. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJORIS.2017100101

  15. Suryaningtyas D, Sudiro A, Troena A, Irawanto W (2019) Organizational resilience and organizational performance: examining the mediating roles of resilient leadership and organizational culture. Acad Strateg Manag J 18(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drobyazko S, Okulich-Kazarin V, Rogovyi A, Goltvenko O, Marova S (2019) Factors of influence on the sustainable development in the strategy management of corporations. Acad Strateg Manag J 18(S1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ever Stream Analytics (2019) Annual risk report 2018. Resilience360. https://www.resilience360.dhl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Resilience360_Annual-Risk-Report-2018.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  18. Barua S (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and world trade: some analytical notes. SSRN Electron J 3577627:1–35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3577627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marinagia C, Trivellas P, Reklitis P (2015) Information quality and supply chain performance: the mediating role of information sharing. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 175(2):473–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaikh FA, Shahbaz MS, Din SU, Odhano N (2020) The role of collaboration and integration in the supply chain of construction industry. Civ Eng J 6(7):1300–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karpuntsov V, Veresha R (2022) Criminal and administrative aspects of the sociology of law: opportunities for expanding the research and the field of expertise. InterEULawEast J Int Eur Law Econ Mark Integr 9(1):147–165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Veresha RV (2016) Problem of determining the chance (casus) in criminal law. Int J Environ Sci Educ 11(17):10241–10252

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hinkka V, Mäkinen R, Eckhardt J, Lastusilta T (2021) Alternative approach for improvement sustainable supply chain management in the large european container ports. HighTech Innov J 2(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Darabseh M, Martins JP (2020) Risks and opportunities for reforming construction with blockchain: bibliometric study. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091541

  25. Raval P, Sarkar D, Devani D (2022) Application of analytical-network-process (ANP) for evaluation of key-performance-indicators (KPI) for application of blockchain technology in infrastructure projects. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(6):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Centobelli P, Cerchion R, Esposito E (2020) Pursuing supply chain sustainable development goals through the adoption of green practices and enabling technologies: a cross-country analysis of LSPs. Technol Forecast Soc Change 153:119920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty (2020) Allianz risk barometer: identifying the major business risks for 2020. https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/Allianz-Risk-Barometer-2020.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  28. Vidrova Z (2020) Supply chain management in the aspect of globalization. SHS Web Conf 74:04031. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207404031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Distelhort G, Fu D (2017) Wages and working conditions in and out of global supply chains: A comparative empirical review. In: International labour office, Bureau for employers’ activities (ACT/EMP), Geneva

  30. Al-Humairi SN, Kamal AAA (2021) Opportunities and challenges for the building monitoring systems in the age-pandemic of COVID-19: review and prospects. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Milovanović G, Milovanović S, Radisavljević G (2017) Globalization: the key challenge of modern supply chains. Ekonomika 63(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.290197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. EMTEMP (2021) Gartner supply chain top 25 results for 2021. https://emtemp.gcom.cloud/ngw/globalassets/en/supply-chain/documents/trends/global-supply-chain-top-25-report-2021.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  33. Boone C, Manrodt K, Holcomb M (2021) 30th annual study of logistics and transportation trends: Talent and technology. Georgia College and Mississippi State University. https://scg-lm.s3.amazonaws.com/pdfs/lm_res_masters_logistics_xl_092921c.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  34. Coleman M, Wu M, Baidoo JM (2020) Globalization and corporate governance mechanism, engine of change. Bus Econ Res 10(1):210–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kusi-Sarpong S, Gupta H, Sarkis J (2019) A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. Int J Prod Res 57(7):1990–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aliyeva Z (2019) The role of marketing in ensuring competitiveness of construction enterprise in the context of market conditions. J Econ Sci Theory Pract 76(2)

  37. Timmer MP, Los B, Stehrer R, de Vries GJ (2021) Supply chain fragmentation and the global trade elasticity: a new accounting framework. IMF Econ Rev 69(4):656–680. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00134-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fan P, Wang Y, Xu N (2021) Value added mechanism and organisational model optimisation of agricultural products circulation value chain from the perspective of game theory. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 71(3):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2021.1879927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abdyusheva DR, Stepanov AA (2019) Characteristics of the transportation structure of the transport-logistical complex and its dynamics. Upravlenie 7(4):24–31. https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-4-24-31. (In Russ.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ever Stream Analytics (2021) Annual risk report 2021. Resilience360. https://www.everstream.ai/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/20210408-Everstream-Analytics-Annual-Risk-Report.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2021

  41. Belhadi A, Mani V, Kamble SS, Khan SAR, Verma S (2021) Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pirttilä M, Virolainen VM, Lind L, Kärri T (2020) Working capital management in the Russian automotive industry supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 221:107474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Raval P, Sarkar D, Devani D (2022) Application of analytical-network-process (ANP) for evaluation of key-performance-indicators (KPI) for application of blockchain technology in infrastructure projects. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(6):358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ernst R, Haar J (2019) Globalization, competitiveness, and governability: the three disruptive forces of business in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Trifonov P, Seryshev R (2018) Transformation of supply chain management in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution. Strat Decis Risk Manag 3(108):30–37. https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2018-3-30-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang Y, Lin C, Liu S, Tang H (2019) Supply chain linkages and financial markets: evaluating the costs of the US-China trade war. In: Trade war: the clash of economic systems endangering global prosperity. CEPR Press, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  47. Aliedan M (2022) The geopolitics of international trade in Saudi Arabia: Saudi vision 2030. Cuad Econ 45(127):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  48. Todeva E (2018) The global innovation index as a measure of triple helix engagement. In: International Triple Helix Summit. Springer, Cham, pp 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_10

  49. Vlckova J, Thakur-Weigold BS (2019) Global value chains in the MedTech industry: a comparison of Switzerland and the Czech Republic. Int J Emerg Mark 15(1):70–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2017-0179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Oakley P (2022) Searching for pure gold: the impact of ethical gold sourcing certification programmes in the UK and Switzerland. Environ Sci Policy 132:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu Y, Huo B, Zhang ZJ (2021) Impact of information technology on supply chain integration and company performance: evidence from cross-border e-commerce companies in China. J Enterp Inf Manag 34(1):460–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2020-0101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Holroyd C (2022) Technological innovation and building a ‘super smart’ society: Japan’s vision of society 5.0. J Asian Public Policy 15(1):18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1749340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bezpalov V, Gukasyan G, Okhrimenko I (2022) Economic corridors in the context of the development of macroregions. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7(4):275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00848-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Abbasov N (2022) The nature of innovative economic growth and development directions of its formation. J Econ Sci Theory Pract 79(1)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Insurance and Social Economy, Financial University Under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

    Larisa Orlanyuk-Malitskaya & Tatiana Plakhova

  2. Department of Transportation Management, State University of Management, Moscow, Russian Federation

    Tatyana Sakulyeva

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation

    Irina Glazkova

Authors
  1. Larisa Orlanyuk-Malitskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatiana Plakhova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tatyana Sakulyeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Irina Glazkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larisa Orlanyuk-Malitskaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The authors declare that the work is written with due consideration of ethical standards. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved by the Ethics Committee of Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation” (Protocol № 6 of 13.06.2020).

Informed consent

All research participants gave their written informed consent before the commencement of the research.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orlanyuk-Malitskaya, L., Plakhova, T., Sakulyeva, T. et al. The impact of globalisation processes on supply chain management. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01331-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01331-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation