Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonic pulse velocity in concrete made with recycled brick aggregate

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A detailed experimental investigation was carried out to understand the effect of ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) in concrete made with recycled brick aggregate (RBA). For this, cylindrical concrete specimens of 100 mm × 200 mm size were prepared where s/a ratio were 0.36, 0.40, and 0.44 and W/C ratio were 0.45, 0.50, and 0.55. Some cylindrical mortar specimens were also prepared by sieving fresh concrete through a 4.75 mm sieve. The compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and UPV in mortar specimens and concrete made with RBA were tested at 7, 28, 60, and 90 days. UPV in concrete is influenced by the old mortar adhered to the surface of coarse aggregate in concrete. The results were compared to that of the control concrete specimens made with virgin brick aggregate and concrete made with virgin stone aggregate. Relationships between UPV and compressive strength, and UPV and modulus of elasticity of concrete are proposed and compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Monteiro PJ, Miller SA, Horvath A (2017). Towards sustainable concrete. Nat Mater

  2. Mehta PK (2001) Reducing the environmental impact of concrete. Concr Int 23:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehta PK (2009) Global concrete industry sustainability. ACI Concrete Int 31:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohammed TU, Hasnat A, Awal MA et al (2015) Recycling of brick aggregate concrete as coarse aggregate. J Mater Civ Eng 27:B4014005(1)-B4014005(9)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Torring M, Lauritzen E (2002) Total recycling opportunities—tasting the topics for the conference session. In: Challenges of concrete construction: volume 5, sustainable concrete construction: proceedings of the international conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, pp 501–510

  6. Arora S, Singh S (2016) Analysis of flexural fatigue failure of concrete made with 100% coarse recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater 102:782–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yanagibashi K, Yonezawa T, Arakawa K, et al (2002) A new concrete recycling technique for coarse aggregate regeneration process. In: Dhir RK, Dyer TD, Halliday JE (eds) Proceedings of the international congress: challenges of concrete construction, Conf 2-sustainable concrete construction. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, pp 511–522

  8. Sáez del Bosque IF, Zhu W, Howind T et al (2017) Properties of interfacial transition zones (ITZs) in concrete containing recycled mixed aggregate. Cement Concrete Compos 81:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Medjigbodo S, Bendimerad AZ, Rozière E, et al (2018) How do recycled concrete aggregates modify the shrinkage and self-healing properties? Cement Concrete Compos 86:72–86

  10. Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí A (2006) Microstructure analysis of hardened recycled aggregate concrete. Mag Concr Res 58:683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Poon C, Shui Z, Lam L (2004) Effect of microstructure of ITZ on compressive strength of concrete prepared with recycled aggregates. Construct Build Mater 18:461–468

  12. Li W, Xiao J, Sun Z, et al (2012) Interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete with different mixing approaches. Construct Build Mater 35:1045–1055

  13. Xiao J, Li W, Sun Z, et al (2013) Properties of interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete tested by nanoindentation. Cement Concrete Compos 37:276–292

  14. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM (2005) Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate concrete produced from two-stage mixing approach. Cement Concrete Res 35:1195–1203

  15. Kong D, Lei T, Zheng J, et al (2010) Effect and mechanism of surface-coating pozzalanics materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Construct Build Mater 24:701–708

  16. Leite MB, Monteiro PJM (2016) Microstructural analysis of recycled concrete using X-ray microtomography. Cement Concrete Res 81:38–48

  17. Tam VWY, Tam CM (2008) Diversifying two-stage mixing approach (TSMA) for recycled aggregate concrete: TSMAs and TSMAsc. Construct Build Mater 22:2068–2077

  18. Dineshkumar R, Harikaran C, Veerapandi P (2020) Corrosion assessment in reinforced concrete elements using half-cell potentiometer—a review. Test Eng Manag 9:1954–1957

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammed TU, Mahmood AH (2016) Effects of maximum aggregate size on UPV of brick aggregate concrete. Ultrasonics 69:129–136

  20. Mohammed TU, Fateh Azam Khan M, Kabir MR, et al (2010) Recycling of concrete made with brick aggregate. In: Naik TR, Ganjian E (eds) 2nd international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies. Ancona, Italy, pp 949–960

  21. Akhtaruzzaman AA, Hasnat A (1983) Properties of concrete using crushed brick as aggregate. ACI Concrete Int 5:58–83

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammed TU, Mahmood AH, Kamal MRI, et al (2017) Effects of maximum size of brick aggregate on properties of concrete. Construct Build Mater 134:713–726

  23. Anderson DA, Seals KR (1981) Pulse velocity as a predictor of 28- and 90-day strength. ACI Mater J 78:116–122

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trtnik G, Kavcic F, Turk G (2009) Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics 49:53–60

  25. Parasnis DS (1986) Principles of applied geophysics, 4th edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Molhotra V, Press ISU 1976. Testing Hardened Concrete: Nondestructive Methods. ACI monograph No 9. 1st ed. Detroit. MI: American Concrete Institute, p 188

  27. Yasuo Tanigawa and Hiroshi Mori KB, Yasuo Tanigawa KB, Hiroshi M (1984) Estimation of concrete strength by combined nondestructive testing method. ACI Mater J 82:57–76

  28. Yıldırım H, Sengul O (2011) Modulus of elasticity of substandard and normal concretes. Construct Build Mater 25:1645–1652

  29. Abo-Qudais SA (2005) Effect of concrete mixing parameters on propagation of ultrasonic waves. Construct Build Mater 19:257–263

  30. Solís-Carcaño R, Moreno EI (2008) Evaluation of concrete made with crushed limestone aggregate based on ultrasonic pulse velocity. Constr Build Mater 22:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. del Rı́o LM, Jiménez A, López F, et al (2004) Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 42:527–530

  32. Ben-Zeitun AE (1986) Use of pulse velocity to predict compressive strength of concrete. Int J Cement Compos Lightweight Concrete 8:51–59

  33. Kaplan MF (1959) The effects of age and water/cement ratio upon the relation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete. Mag Concrete Res 11:85–92

  34. Kaplan MF (1960) The relation between ultrasonic pulse velocity and the compressive strength of concretes having the same workability but different mix proportions. Mag Concrete Res 12:3–8

  35. Ohdaira E, Masuzawa N (2000) Water content and its effect on ultrasound propagation in concrete—the possibility of NDE. Ultrasonics 38:546–552

  36. Hernández MG, Izquierdo MAG, Ibáñez A, et al (2000) Porosity estimation of concrete by ultrasonic NDE. Ultrasonics 38:531–533

  37. Mahure NV, Vijh GK, Sharma P et al (2011) Correlation between pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4:871–874

    Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Nu’man BS, Aziz BR, Abdulla SA, et al (2015) Compressive strength formula for concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity. 26: 8–13.

  39. Turgut P (2004) Research into the correlation between concrete strength and UPV values. NDT.net. 12:1–9

  40. Kewalramani MA, Gupta R (2006) Concrete compressive strength prediction using ultrasonic pulse velocity through artificial neural networks. Autom Construct 15:374–379.

  41. Mohammed TU, Rahman MN (2016) Effect of types of aggregate and sand-to-aggregate volume ratio on UPV in concrete. Construct Build Mater. 125:832–841

  42. Turgut P (2004) Evaluation of the ultrasonic pulse velocity data coming on the field. In: 4th international conference on NDE in relation to structural integrity for nuclear and pressurized components, London, pp 573–578

  43. Kheder GF (1999) A two stage procedure for assessment of in situ concrete strength using combined non-destructive testing. Mater Struct. 32:410–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482712.

  44. Jain A, Kathuria A, Kumar A, et al (2013) Combined use of non-destructive tests for assessment of strength of concrete in structure. Proc Eng 54:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support and facilities provided by Islamic University of Technology (IUT) for research works in the field of concrete technology at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE). The authors also wish to express their gratitude to Seven Circle Bangladesh Ltd. for providing materials for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Nafiur Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed, T.U., Rahman, M.N., Ishraq, R. et al. Ultrasonic pulse velocity in concrete made with recycled brick aggregate. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 162 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00542-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00542-9

Keywords

Navigation