Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of soil burial exposure on durability of alkali-activated binder-treated jute geotextile

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of natural fibers for ground improvement has gained a lot of popularity in the present world in order to achieve sustainability. However, the major problem of using a natural fiber in soil is its biodegradability within a short period of 6–12 months. Research has proved that the life span of natural jute can be improved by treating them with antimicrobial chemicals. But these chemical treatments are expensive as well as lead to leaching. The present paper proposes a sustainable and environment friendly method to improve the strength and durability properties of jute geotextiles by treating it with alkali-activated binder (AAB). Reaction between an activator solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate and an aluminosilicate precursor (Class F Fly ash) lead to the formation AAB. The water to solid ratio is varied in the present study from 0.35 to 0.45 to obtain the optimum workable solution. A series of microstructural (Stereomicroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope) and mechanical characterization (thickness, mass density and aperture opening size) tests along with durability tests (soil burial) are conducted for both untreated and treated jute. Locally available red soil is used for the soil burial study. It is inferred from microstructural studies that the lignocellulosic structure present in jute fiber is not fully altered by AAB treatment. From durability test, it is observed that the tensile strength of AAB-treated jute improves almost twofold in comparison to untreated jute. The durability tests indicate that after a burial period of 6 months, the tensile strength AAB-treated jute is significantly greater than untreated jute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Shtykov VI, Blazhko LS, Ponomarev AB (2017) The performance of geotextile materials used for filtration and separation in different structures as an important part of geotextiles requirements. Proc Eng 189:247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouazza A, Freund M, Nahlawi H (2006) Water retention of nonwoven polyester geotextiles. Polym Test 25(8):1038–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Restall SJ, Jackson LA, Heerten G, Hornsey WP (2002) Case studies showing the growth and development of geotextile sand containers. An Australian perspective. Geotext Geomembr 20(5):321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nam S, Netravali AN (2006) Green composites. I. Physical properties of ramie fibers for environment-friendly green composites. Fibers Polym 7:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanyal T (2017) Jute geotextiles and their applications in civil engineering. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Lekha KR (2004) Field instrumentation and monitoring of soil erosion in coir geotextile stabilised slopes. A case study. Geotext Geomembr 22(5):399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Subaida EA, Chandrakaran S, Sankar N (2009) Laboratory performance of unpaved roads reinforced with woven coir geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rawal A, Anandjiwala R (2007) Comparative study between needle punched nonwoven geotextile structures made from flax and polyester fibres. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa MF, Chiou BS, Medeiros ES, Wood DF, Williams TG, Mattoso LH, Imam SH (2009) Effect of fiber treatments on tensile and thermal properties of starch/ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymers/coir biocomposites. Bioresour Technol 100(21):5196–5202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang WM, Cai ZS, Yu JY, Xia ZP (2009) Changes in composition, structure, and properties of jute fibers after chemical treatments. Fibers Polym 10(6):776–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saha P, Manna S, Chowdhury SR, Sen R, Roy D, Adhikari B (2010) Enhancement of tensile strength of lignocellulosic jute fibers by alkali-steam treatment. Bioresour Technol 101(9):3182–3187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saha P, Roy D, Manna S, Adhikari B, Sen R, Roy S (2012) Durability of transesterified jute geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 35:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakrabarti SK, Saha SG, Paul P, Dewan AR, Das K, Chowdhury PK, Gon DP, Ray P (2016) Specially treated woven jute geotextiles for river bank protection. Indian J Fibre Text Res (IJFTR) 41(2):207–211

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanyal T, Chakraborty K (1994) Application of a bitumen-coated jute geotextile in bank-protection works in the Hooghly estuary. Geotext Geomembr 13(2):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Basu G, Roy AN, Bhattacharyya SK, Ghosh SK (2009) Construction of unpaved rural road using jute synthetic blended woven geotextile. A case study. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uddin MK, Khan MA, Ali KI (1997) Degradable jute plastic composites. Polym Degrad Stab 55(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wahit MU, Akos NI, Laftah WA (2012) Influence of natural fibers on the mechanical properties and biodegradation of poly (lactic acid) and poly (ε-caprolactone) composites. A review. Polym Compos 33(7):1045–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yussuf AA, MassoumiI Hassan A (2010) Comparison of polylactic acid/kenaf and polylactic acid/rise husk composites: the influence of the natural fibers on the mechanical, thermal and biodegradability properties. J Polym Environ 18(3):422–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Batista KC, Silva DAK, Coelho LAF, Pezzin SH, Pezzin APT (2010) Soil biodegradation o PHBV/peach palm particles biocomposites. J Polym Environ 18(3):346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beninia KCCC, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH (2011) Mechanical properties of HIPS/sugarcane bagasse fiber composites after accelerated weathering. Proc Eng 10:3246–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dittenber DB (2012) Effect of alkalization on flexural properties and moisture absorption of kenaf fiber reinforced composites. In: International SAMPE technical conference

  22. Chee SS, Jawaid M, Sultan MTH, Alothman OY, Abdullah LC (2019) Accelerated weathering and soil burial effects on colour, biodegradability and thermal properties of bamboo/kenaf/epoxy hybrid composites. Polym Test 79:106054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sumi S, Unnikrishnan N, Mathew L (2016) Experimental investigations on biological resistance of surface modified coir geotextiles. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 2(4):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dash BN, Sarkar M, Rana AK, Mishra M, Mohanty AK, Tripathy SS (2002) A study on biodegradable composite prepared from jute felt and polyesteramide (BAK). J Reinf Plast Compos 21(16):1493–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Akter N, Saha J, Das SC, Khan MA (2018) Effect of bitumen emulsion and polyester resin mixture on the physic mechanical and degradable properties of jute fabrics. Fibers 6(3):44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schurholz H (1992) Use of woven coir geotextiles in Europe. In: Proceedings of the United Kingdom coir geotextile seminar, West Midlands

  27. Balan K (1995) Studies on engineering behaviour and uses of geotextiles with natural fibres (Doctoral dissertation)

  28. Marques AR, de Oliveira Patrício PS, dos Santos FS, Monteiro ML, de Carvalho Urashima D, de Souza Rodrigues C (2014) Effects of the climatic conditions of the southeastern Brazil on degradation the fibers of coir-geotextile: evaluation of mechanical and structural properties. Geotext Geomembr 42(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khalil HPSA, Poh BT, Jawaid M, Ridzuan R, Suriana R, Said MR, Ahmad F, Fuad NAN (2010) The effect of soil burial degradation of oil palm trunk fiber-filled recycled polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(11):1653–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen C, Yin W, Chen G, Sun G, Wang G (2017) Effects of biodegradation on the structure and properties of windmill palm (Trachycarpus fortunei) fibers using different chemical treatments. Materials 10(514):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  31. Juntuek P, Chumsamrong P, Ruksakulpiwat Y, Ruksakulpiwat C (2014) Effect of vetiver grass fiber on soil burial degradation of natural rubber and polylactic acid composites. Int Polym Process J Polym Process Soc 3:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fakhrul T, Islam MA (2013) Degradation behavior of natural fiber reinforced polymer matrix composites. Proc Eng 56:795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Luthra P, Vimal KK, Goel V, Singh R, Kapur GS (2020) Biodegradation studies of polypropylene/natural fiber composites. SN Appl Sci 2:512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2287-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Andersson M, Tillman AM (1989) Acetylation of jute: effects on strength, rot resistance, and hydrophobicity. J Appl Polym Sci 37(12):3437–3447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kar A, Ray I, Halabe UB, Unnikrishnan A, Dawson-Andoh B (2014) Characterizations and estimation of alkali activated binder paste from microstructures. Int J Concr Struct Mater 8(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abderrahim B, Abderrahman E, Mohamed A, Fatima T, Abdesselam T, Krim O (2015) Kinetic thermal degradation of cellulose, polybutylene succinate and a green composite: comparative study. World J Environ Eng 3:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  37. Abdulkhani A, Marvast EH, Ashori A, Hamzeh Y, Karimi AN (2013) Preparation of cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol biocomposite films using 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Int J Biol Macromol 62:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Neto ARS, Araujo MA, Souza FV, Mattoso LH, Marconcini JM (2013) Characterization and comparative evaluation of thermal, structural, chemical, mechanical and morphological properties of six pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use in composites. Ind Crops Prod 43:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta S, GuhaRay A, Kar A, Komaravolu VP (2018) Performance of alkali-activated binder treated jute geotextile as reinforcement for subgrade stabilization. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1464272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad campus for providing the materials and the laboratory setup required to conduct the experiments, especially the Central Analytical Laboratory for FTIR and SEM analysis.

Funding

This work is part of an ongoing Project supported by Department of Science and Technology (DST), International Bilateral Cooperation Division, Govt. of India for supporting the present study through Indo-Austria bilateral Grant (Project ID: INT/AUSTRIA/BMWF/P-22/2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, BITS-Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Secunderabad, 500078, India

    G. Sachin Chakravarthy, Anasua GuhaRay & Arkamitra Kar

Authors
  1. G. Sachin Chakravarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anasua GuhaRay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arkamitra Kar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anasua GuhaRay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not feel any conflict of interest with any other researcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakravarthy, G.S., GuhaRay, A. & Kar, A. Effect of soil burial exposure on durability of alkali-activated binder-treated jute geotextile. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00441-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00441-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation