Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental study of ground improvement by using encased stone columns

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of stone columns increases the stiffness of soft soils which contributes to its load carrying capacity and accelerates the process of consolidation leading to reduction in settlement. However, under external loading, squeezing of adjacent soil into the columns not only compromises the integrity of the columns but also reduces its stiffness, strength and drainage properties. The present study investigates the use of vertically and horizontally reinforced stone columns, as a remedial measure for ordinary unreinforced stone columns. The vertical reinforcement is done by encasing the stone columns in geotextile and horizontally by placing geotextile circular discs within the columns at regular interval. Model tests on group of 3 and 4 unreinforced and reinforced stone columns have been conducted in weak sandy soil. The load–settlement response and failure modes for both reinforced and unreinforced groups have been studied. It is observed that reinforced group of stone columns depict better load bearing capacity as compared to unreinforced group. Moreover, bearing capacity for vertically encased and horizontally reinforced is almost similar, with horizontally reinforced group of 4 stone columns depicting slightly higher (1–2%) bearing capacity for a settlement of 30 mm. The experimental results are also validated with theoretical results and are found to be in good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munfakh GA, Sarkar SK, Castelli RP (1983) Performance of a test embankment founded on stone columns. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in piling and ground treatment for foundations, London, pp 259–265

  2. Yan J, Ye SL (2001) Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (ASCE) 127(7):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choobbasti AJ, Zahmatkesh A, Noorzad R (2011) Performance of stone columns in soft clay: numerical evaluation. Geotech Geol Eng 29:675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elshazly HA, Hafez DA, Mossaad ME (2008) Reliability of conventional settlement evaluation for circular foundations on stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 26(3):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guetif Z, Bouassida M, Debats JM (2007) Improved clay characteristics due to stone column installation. Comput Geotech 34:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shirazi MR, Zarrin O, Valipourian K (2015) The role of vibro-stone column for enhancing the soft soil properties. Int J Civ Environ Eng 9(5):616–620

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thevanayagam S, Martin GR, Nashed R, Shenthan T, Kanagalingam T, Ecemis N (2006) Liquefaction remediation in silty soils using dynamic compaction and stone columns. Technical Report MCEER-06-0009, August 2006

  8. McKelvey D, Sivakumar V, Bell A, Graham J (2004) Modelling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Geotech Eng 157(GE3):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhan Y, Jiang G, Yao H (2014) Dynamic characteristics of saturated silty soil ground treated by stone column composite foundation. Adv Mater Sci Eng, Article ID 745386, 1–7

  10. Luo M (2018) Finite element analysis of gravel pile composite foundation under flexible foundation of Airport Engineering. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 113:012093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu CY, Ku CY, Xiao JE, Huang CC, Hsu SM (2017) Numerical modeling of unsaturated layered soil for rainfall-induced shallow landslides. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 25(4):329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meshkinghalam H, Bonab MH, Azar AK (2017) Numerical investigation of stone columns system for liquefaction and settlement diminution potential. Int J Geo-Eng 8:Article no. 11

  13. Liu W, Hutchinson TC (2018) Numerical investigation of stone columns as a method for improving theperformance of rocking foundation systems. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 106:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Etezad M, Hanna AM, Asce F, Ayadat T (2015) Bearing capacity of a group of stone columns in soft soil. Int J Geomech 15(2):Article ID 04014043 (1–15)

  15. Nehab N, Baba K, Ouadif L, Bahi L (2016) Three-dimensional modeling of a group of stone columns in “Bouregreg Valley” soft ground. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11(24):14537–14544

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gueguin M, Hassen G, de Buhan P (2015) Stability analysis of homogenized stone column reinforced foundations using a numerical yield design approach. Comput Geotech 64:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuedlein AW, Holtz RD (2013) Bearing capacity of spread footings on aggregate pier reinforced clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nassaji F, Asakereh A (2013) Effect of Granular bed on behavior of stone column improved ground. Int J Sci Eng Investig 23(2):67–71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Killeen MM, McCabe BA (2014) Settlement performance of pad footings on soft clay supported by stone columns: a numerical study. Soils Found 54(4):760–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muir Wood D, Hu W, Nash DFT (2000) Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests. Geotechnique 50(6):689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ambily AP, Gandhi SR (2007) Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2007) Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Geosynth Int 14(6):346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2008) Performance of encased stone columns and design guidelines for construction on soft clay soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics, pp 729–734

  24. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2010) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tandel YK, Solanki CH, Desai AK (2012) Reinforced granular column for deep soil stabilization: a review. Int J Civ Struct Eng 2(3):720–730

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nasiri M, Hajiazizi M (2019) An experimental and numerical investigation of reinforced slope using geotextile encased stone column. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1651029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2012) Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study. Geosynth Int 19(4):292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dash SK, Bora MC (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotext Geomembr 41:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghazavi M, Yamchi AE, Afshar JN (2018) Bearing capacity of horizontally layered geosynthetic reinforced stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 46:312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2014) Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynth Int 21(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shenthan T, Nashed R, Thevanayagam S, Martin GR (2004) Liquefaction mitigation in silty soils using composite stone columns. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 3(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zahmatkesh A, Choobbasti AJ (2010) Settlement evaluation of soft clay reinforced by stone columns, considering the effect of soil compaction. Int J Recent Res Appl Sci 3(2):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  33. Maduro IJ, Molina CR, Castillo LV, Renoud-Lias B, Salvi GJ (2004) The use of stone columns on settlement and liquefaction susceptible soils. In: International conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, p 6

  34. Chenari RJ, Fard MK, Chenari MJ, Sosahab JS (2019) Physical and numerical modeling of stone column behavior in loose sand. Int J Civ Eng 17:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Malarvizhi SN, Ilamparuthi K (2007) Comparative study on the behaviour of encased stone column and conventional stone column. Soils Found 47:873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alexiew D, Raithel M (2015) Geotextile-encased columns: case studies over twenty years. In: Embankments with special reference to consolidation and other physical methods. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 451–477

  37. Chen JF, Li LY, Xue JF, Feng SZ (2015) Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment. Geotext Geomembr 43:424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Elshazly H, Elkasabgy M, Elleboudy A (2008) Effect of inter-column spacing on soil stresses due to vibro-installed stone columns: interesting findings. J Geotech Geol Eng 26:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Adam D, Schweiger HF, Markiewicz R, kNabe T (2010) Euro 2008 Stadium Klagenfurt—prediction, monitoring and back calculation of settlement behavior. In: Proceedings of the from research to design in European practice, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 2–4 June 2010

  40. Shahu JT, Reddy YR (2011) Clayey soil reinforced with stone column group: model tests and analyses. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1265–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Black JA, Sivakumar V, Bell A (2011) The settlement performance of stone column foundations. Geotechnique 61(11):909–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohanty P, Samanta M (2015) Experimental and numerical studies on response of the stone column in layered soil. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(3):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Castro J (2017) Modeling stone columns. Materials 10(7):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mehrannia N, Nazariafshar J, Kalantary F (2017) Experimental investigation on the bearing capacity of stone columns with granular blankets. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0317-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. BIS IS 15284-1: 2003 Design and construction for ground improvement—guidelines—part 1: stone columns. Bureau of Indian Standards, ManakBhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg, New Delhi, India

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Ankit Thakur, Saurabh Rawat & Ashok Kumar Gupta

Authors
  1. Ankit Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saurabh Rawat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashok Kumar Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Rawat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, A., Rawat, S. & Gupta, A.K. Experimental study of ground improvement by using encased stone columns. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00383-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00383-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation