Skip to main content
Log in

Studying the Effect of Fundamental Structural Period on the Seismic Fragility Curves of Two-Span Integral Concrete Box Girder Bridges

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main step in deriving fragility curves of structures is to develop their probabilistic seismic demand model (PSDM). PSDMs can be expressed as the linear regression of engineering demand parameters and intensity measure suitable pairs in the log-transformed space. However, extracting PSDMs can be costly, computationally challenging, and time-consuming. For these reasons, this study proposes a practical method to estimate the two coefficients of the regression fit line of PSDM based on the fundamental periods of two-span integral concrete box girder bridges. Moreover, the effect of geometrical properties on the fundamental period has been investigated and an equation has been derived for the estimation of the fundamental period. For statistical analyses, 220 bridges are modeled using Latin hyper-cube sampling while 35,200 nonlinear time history analyses are done using OpenSees software to generate PSDMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker JW, Lin T, Shahi SK, Jayaram N (2011) New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report, University of California, Berkeley, USA

  • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2013) Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 17. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik OC, Ellingwood BR (2010) Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Struct Saf 32(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi E (2002) Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng 128(4):526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesRoches R, Padgett J, Ramanathan K, Dukes J (2012) Feasibility studies for improving Caltrans bridge fragility relationships (No. CA12-1775)

  • Dukes JD (2013) Application of bridge specific fragility analysis in the seismic design process of bridges in California, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA

  • Dukes J, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2012) Sensitivity study of design parameters used to develop bridge specific fragility curves. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 720

  • Jeon JS, Mangalathu S, Lee SY (2019) Seismic fragility curves for California concrete bridges with flared two-column bents. Bull Earthq Eng 17(7):4299–4319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon OS, Elnashai AS (2010) Fragility analysis of a highway over-crossing bridge with consideration of soil–structure interactions. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1–2):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangalathu S, Jeon, JS, DesRoches R, Padgett J (2016) Application of Bayesian methods to probabilistic seismic demand analyses of concrete box-girder bridges. In: Proceedings of conference, on geotechnical and structural engineering, pp 1367–1379

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, 264

  • Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2009) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation user command-language manual—OpenSees version 2.0. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • McKay MD et al (1979) Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Megally SH, Silva PF, Seible F (2001) Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments. Report no SSRP-2001/23, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego

  • Muthukumar S (2003) A contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Nielson BG (2005) Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2006) Influence of modeling assumptions on the seismic response of multi-span simply supported steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones. Eng Struct 28(8):1083–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omrani R, Mobasher B, Sheikhakbari S, Zareian F, Taciroglu E (2017) Variability in the predicted seismic performance of a typical seat-type California bridge due to epistemic uncertainties in its abutment backfill and shear-key models. Eng Struct 148:718–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2007) Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty. J Struct Eng 133(12):1710–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2008) Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(8):1157–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan KN (2012) Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Ramanathan K, Jeon JS, Zakeri B, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2015) Seismic response prediction and modeling considerations for curved and skewed concrete box-girder bridges. Earthq Struct 9(6):1153–1179. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsabadi A, Yan L (2008) Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems. In: Proceedings of the geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV congress. ASCE, pp 1–10

  • Silva PF, Megally S, Seible F (2009) Seismic performance of sacrificial exterior shear keys in bridge abutments. Earthq Spectra 25(3):643–664. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3155405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani F, Vidakovic B, DesRoches R, Padgett J (2017) Identification of the significant uncertain parameters in the seismic response of irregular bridges. Eng Struct 141:356–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Zheng Q, Yang CSW, Zhang W, DesRoches R, Padgett JE, Taciroglu E (2019) Probabilistic models of abutment backfills for regional seismic assessment of highway bridges in California. Eng Struct 180:452–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdolrasoul Ranjbaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amirian, P., Ranjbaran, A. Studying the Effect of Fundamental Structural Period on the Seismic Fragility Curves of Two-Span Integral Concrete Box Girder Bridges. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44 (Suppl 1), 11–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00312-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00312-9

Keywords

Navigation