Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Failure mechanisms of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites with complex fiber configurations under impact

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic matrix composites has been increasingly used in manufacturing high-performance prototypes or even functional parts. It has allowed engineers and researchers to produce composites with custom design on their fiber configurations besides geometries. This work focuses on studying the printability of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites with different fiber configurations, including cross-ply, unidirectional, and complex helicoidal structures with different fiber angles, as well as evaluating their impact performance and failure mechanisms from impact. It was found that main failure mechanisms at the filament level included filament fracture, in-plane debonding and through-thickness debonding of continuous fiber composite filaments at the impact site. Interlaminar delamination occurred to some samples and both fiber configuration and sample thickness affected its occurrence. The impact testing results also showed that printed continuous glass fiber composite had better impact performance than printed continuous Kevlar fiber composite. The findings of this work can provide guidelines in both geometry and fiber configuration design to achieve different failure mechanisms for 3D printed continuous fiber composites under impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available upon request.

References

  1. Ning H (2021) Thermoplastic composites: principles and applications: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG

  2. Kabir SF, Mathur K, Seyam AFM (2020) A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: history, mechanism, materials and properties. Compos Str 232:111476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tian X, Todoroki A, Liu T, Wu L, Hou Z, Ueda M, et al. (2022) 3d printing of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites: Development, application, and prospective. Chinese J Mech Eng Addit Manuf Front 100016

  4. Zeng C, Liu L, Bian W, Leng J, Liu Y (2021) Bending performance and failure behavior of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite corrugated sandwich structures with shape memory capability. Compos Str 262:113626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akhoundi B, Behravesh AH, Bagheri SA (2019) Improving mechanical properties of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by FDM 3D printer. J Reinf Plast Compos 38(3):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohammadizadeh M, Fidan I (2021) Tensile performance of 3d-printed continuous fiber-reinforced nylon composites. J Manuf Mater Process 5(3):68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Todoroki A, Oasada T, Mizutani Y, Suzuki Y, Ueda M, Matsuzaki R et al (2020) Tensile property evaluations of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. Adv Compos Mater 29(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khosravani MR, Frohn-Sörensen P, Reuter J, Engel B, Reinicke T (2022) Fracture studies of 3D-printed continuous glass fiber reinforced composites. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 119:103317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ismail KI, Yap TC, Ahmed R (2022) 3D-printed fiber-reinforced polymer composites by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM): fiber length and fiber implementation techniques. Polymers 14(21):4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks H, Tyas D, Molony S (2017) Tensile and fatigue failure of 3D printed parts with continuous fibre reinforcement. Int J Rapid Manuf 6(2–3):97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. https://markforged.com/datasheets, Accessed in Nov 2022

  12. Naranjo-Lozada J, Ahuett-Garza H, Orta-Castañón P, Verbeeten WM, Sáiz-González D (2019) Tensile properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous carbon fiber composites produced by additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 26:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandes RR, van de Werken N, Koirala P, Yap T, Tamijani AY, Tehrani M (2021) Experimental investigation of additively manufactured continuous fiber reinforced composite parts with optimized topology and fiber paths. Addit Manuf 44:102056

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saeed K, McIlhagger A, Harkin-Jones E, McGarrigle C, Dixon D, Shar MA et al (2022) Characterization of continuous carbon fibre reinforced 3D printed polymer composites with varying fibre volume fractions. Compos Str 282:115033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shang J, Tian X, Luo M, Zhu W, Li D, Qin Y et al (2020) Controllable inter-line bonding performance and fracture patterns of continuous fiber reinforced composites by sinusoidal-path 3D printing. Compos Sci Technol 192:108096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang H, Sun WF (2022) Mechanical properties and failure behavior of 3D printed thermoplastic composites using continuous basalt fiber under high-volume fraction. Defence Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chacón J, Caminero M, Núñez P, García-Plaza E, García-Moreno I, Reverte J (2019) Additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 181:107688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen AY, Baehr S, Turner A, Zhang Z, Gu GX (2021) Carbon-fiber reinforced polymer composites: a comparison of manufacturing methods on mechanical properties. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 4(4):468–479

    Google Scholar 

  19. Safari F, Kami A, Abedini V (2022) 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced composites: a review of the processing, pre-and post-processing effects on mechanical properties. Polym Polym Compos 30:09673911221098734

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caminero M, Chacón J, García-Moreno I, Rodríguez G (2018) Impact damage resistance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Compos B Eng 148:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prajapati AR, Dave HK, Raval HK (2021) Effect of fiber volume fraction on the impact strength of fiber reinforced polymer composites made by FDM process. Mater Today Proceed 44:2102–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kabir SF, Mathur K, Seyam AFM (2021) Impact resistance and failure mechanism of 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced cellular composites. J Textile Instit 112(5):752–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hetrick DR, Sanei SHR, Ashour O, Bakis CE (2021) Charpy impact energy absorption of 3D printed continuous Kevlar reinforced composites. J Compos Mater 55(12):1705–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grunenfelder L, Suksangpanya N, Salinas C, Milliron G, Yaraghi N, Herrera S et al (2014) Bio-inspired impact-resistant composites. Acta Biomater 10(9):3997–4008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yaraghi NA, Guarín-Zapata N, Grunenfelder LK, Hintsala E, Bhowmick S, Hiller JM et al (2016) A sinusoidally architected helicoidal biocomposite. Adv Mater 28(32):6835–6844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abir M, Tay T, Lee H (2019) On the improved ballistic performance of bio-inspired composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 123:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ginzburg D, Pinto F, Iervolino O, Meo M (2017) Damage tolerance of bio-inspired helicoidal composites under low velocity impact. Compos Str 161:187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan T, Ribbans B (2017) A bioinspired study on the compressive resistance of helicoidal fibre structures. Proceed Royal Soc A Mathemat Phys Eng Sci 473(2206):20170538

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu J, Singh A, Lee H, Tay T, Tan V (2020) The response of bio-inspired helicoidal laminates to small projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng 142:103608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bednarz ET III, Mulligan RR (2019) Investigation of a cross-section with a constant transverse shear stress distribution using a numerical approach. Appl Syst Innovat 3(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zenkour AM (2015) Thermal bending of layered composite plates resting on elastic foundations using four-unknown shear and normal deformations theory. Compos Str 122:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaari N, Jumahat A, Razif MKM (2015) Impact resistance properties of Kevlar/glass fiber hybrid composite laminates. Jurnal Teknologi https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v76.5520

  34. Kartal İ, Demirer H (2017) Wear properties of hybrid epoxy composites reinforced with carbon/Kevlar/glass fabrics. Acta Phys Pol A 131(3):559–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Evci C, Gülgeç M (2012) An experimental investigation on the impact response of composite materials. Int J Impact Eng 43:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding from the Air Force Research Laboratory Summer Faculty Fellowship Program is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Materials Processing and Application Development Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA

    Haibin Ning

  2. Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate, Eglin AFB, FL, 32542, USA

    Philip Flater & Sean Gibbons

  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA

    Bernard Gaskey

Authors
  1. Haibin Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip Flater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard Gaskey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sean Gibbons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibin Ning.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, H., Flater, P., Gaskey, B. et al. Failure mechanisms of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites with complex fiber configurations under impact. Prog Addit Manuf (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00479-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00479-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation