Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the influence of process parameters on dimensional accuracy and post-sintering crack formation in ceramic 3D printing for porcelain-based commercial resins

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several commercial ceramic resins are nowadays available in the market of Additive Manufacturing, making more approachable ceramic stereolithography (CS) to an extended audience of users, from academic to industrial fields. Lack of knowledge in terms of material characterization and expected behavior in the manufacturing process are the main problems that involve difficulties in obtaining precise, dense, resistant, and crack-free ceramic parts. This article presents a characterization of a porcelain-based commercial ceramic resin for digital light processing (DLP), Porcelite® by Tethon 3D, and a study on the printing dimensional accuracy and cracks formation in sintered samples in dependence on the process parameters used have been performed. Two different Porcelite® resins with different solid loadings are available in the market. Rheological measurements, thermogravimetry combined with differential thermal analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy observation, and X-ray diffraction allowed the complete characterization of the most loaded ceramic suspension. A design of experiment (DoE) approach led to planning the experimental work identifying the geometry of the samples, the process parameters, and their levels of variation to evaluate the aspects that influence dimensional accuracy when printing and crack formation during thermal treatment. The final volumetric shrinkage of components produced, respectively, with Porcelite® Bison (PB) and Porcelite® Universal (PU) is 19.3 ± 2.2% and 41.1 ± 3.6%. Solid loadings evaluated through TG–DTA are 52 wt% for PU and 72 wt% for PB. Statistical analyses highlight that layer thickness and degree of exposure influence accuracy in x- and y-directions, and for both resins, part thickness influences accuracy only in the x-direction for PB resin. Layer thickness, part thickness, and interaction are influential in the z-direction. The printed accuracy shows certain independence from the resin solid loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are present in the article. There is no information from the manufacturer of the ceramic resin on its composition.

References

  1. Trombetta R, Inzana JA, Schwarz EM et al (2017) 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Ann Biomed Eng 45:23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1678-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. da Silva LRR, Sales WF, Campos FAR et al (2021) A comprehensive review on additive manufacturing of medical devices. Prog Addit Manuf 6:517–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40964-021-00188-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinczewski C, Corbel S, Chartier T (1998) Ceramic suspensions suitable for stereolithogiaphy. J Eur Ceram Soc 18:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santoliquido O, Colombo P, Ortona A (2019) Additive manufacturing of ceramic components by digital light processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc 39:2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nötzel D, Eickhoff R, Hanemann T (2018) Fused filament fabrication of small ceramic components. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lv X, Ye F, Cheng L et al (2019) Binder jetting of ceramics: powders, binders, printing parameters, equipment, and post-treatment. Ceram Int 45:12609–12624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shakor P, Chu · S H, Puzatova A, Dini E, (2008) Review of binder jetting 3D printing in the construction industry. Prog Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00252-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sing SL, Yeong WY, Wiria FE et al (2017) Direct selective laser sintering and melting of ceramics: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 23:611–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Z, Li Z, Li J et al (2019) 3D printing of ceramics: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc 39:661–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. An D, Li H, Xie Z et al (2017) Additive manufacturing and characterization of complex Al2O3 parts based on a novel stereolithography method. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 14:836–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Hazan Y, Penner D (2017) SiC and SiOC ceramic articles produced by stereolithography of acrylate modified polycarbosilane systems. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee YH, Bin LJ, Maeng WY et al (2019) Photocurable ceramic slurry using solid camphor as novel diluent for conventional digital light processing (DLP) process. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.05.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minas C, Carnelli D, Tervoort E, Studart AR (2016) 3D printing of emulsions and foams into hierarchical porous ceramics. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shao H, Zhao D, Lin T et al (2017) 3D gel-printing of zirconia ceramic parts. Ceram Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Z, Sun X, Shang Y, et al (2021) Dense ceramics with complex shape fabricated by 3D printing: a review. J Adv Ceram 10:195–218

  16. Bove A, Calignano F, Galati M, Iuliano L (2022) Photopolymerization of ceramic resins by stereolithography process: a review. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bae CJ, Halloran JW (2011) Integrally cored ceramic mold fabricated by ceramic stereolithography. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02568.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johansson E, Lidström O, Johansson J et al (2017) Influence of resin composition on the defect formation in alumina manufactured by stereolithography. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S, Duan W, Zhao T et al (2018) The fabrication of SiBCN ceramic components from preceramic polymers by digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technology. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomeckova V, Halloran JW (2010) Critical energy for photopolymerization of ceramic suspensions in acrylate monomers. J Eur Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goswami A, Ankit K, Balashanmugam N et al (2014) Optimization of rheological properties of photopolymerizable alumina suspensions for ceramic microstereolithography. Ceram Int 40:3655–3665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Truxova V, Safka J, Seidl M et al (2020) Ceramic 3d printing: comparison of SLA and DLP technologies. MM Sci J 2020:3905–3911. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2020_06_2020006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mei H, Zhao R, Xia Y et al (2019) Ultrahigh strength printed ceramic lattices. J Alloys Compd 797:786–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2019.05.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mummareddy B, Maravola M, MacDonald E et al (2020) The fracture properties of metal-ceramic composites manufactured via stereolithography. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 17:413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwentenwein M, Homa J (2015) Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 12:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.12319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Car F, Brnadić G, Tomašić V, Domagoj V. Advanced preparation method of monolithic catalyst carriers using 3D-printing technology. Prog Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00266-x

  27. Kovacev N, Li S, Essa K (2021) Effect of the preparation techniques of photopolymerizable ceramic slurry and printing parameters on the accuracy of 3D printed lattice structures. J Eur Ceram Soc 41:7734–7743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Zou B, Li L et al (2021) Manufacturing of a ceramic groove part based on additive and subtractive technologies. Ceram Int 47:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yadegari F, Fesharakifard R, Barazandeh F. Numerical and experimental investigation of effective parameters on separation force in bottom-up stereolithography process

  30. Zakeri S, Vippola M, Levänen E (2020) A comprehensive review of the photopolymerization of ceramic resins used in stereolithography. Addit Manuf 35:101177

  31. Llanos Peñaloza GA (2018) Additive manufacturing of zirconia. Chalmers University of Technology

  32. Gentry SP, Halloran JW (2013) Depth and width of cured lines in photopolymerizable ceramic suspensions. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:1981–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2013.02.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li X, Zhang H, Shen Y et al (2021) Fabrication of porous β-TCP/58S bioglass scaffolds via top-down DLP printing with high solid loading ceramic-resin slurry. Mater Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Instruments M (2012) Understanding yield stress. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 21:6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen YF, Wang MC, Hon MH (2003) Pore structure and permeation properties of kaolin-silica-alumina ceramics. J Ceram Soc Japan 111:537–543. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj.111.537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Fantozzi, J.C. Nièpce GB (2013) Les Céramiques réfractaires. In: Dunod (ed) Les Céramiques industrielles. Paris, France, pp 119–156

  37. Wang K, Qiu M, Jiao C et al (2020) Study on defect-free debinding green body of ceramic formed by DLP technology. Ceram Int 46:2438–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johansson E, Lidström O, Johansson J, et al (2017) Materials influence of resin composition on the defect formation in alumina manufactured by stereolithography. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020138

  39. Chen Z, Liu C, Li J et al (2019) Mechanical properties and microstructures of 3D printed bulk cordierite parts. Ceram Int 45:19257–19267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kovalenko I, Ramachandran Y, Garan M (2019) Experimental shrinkage study of ceramic DLP 3D printed parts after firing green bodies in a KILN. MM Sci J 2019:2767–2771. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2019_03_2018113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Authors greatly thank the SISCON Interdepartmental Center (Safety of Infrastructures and Constructions) for the use of instruments (rheometer and TG-DTA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Integrated Additive Manufacturing Center (IAM), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy

    Alessandro Bove, Manuela Galati & Flaviana Calignano

  2. Department of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT), INSTM R.U. Lince Laboratory, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy

    Jean-Marc Tulliani

Authors
  1. Alessandro Bove
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Marc Tulliani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manuela Galati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flaviana Calignano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, validation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. J-MT: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, validation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. MG: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. FC: supervision, resources, conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flaviana Calignano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bove, A., Tulliani, JM., Galati, M. et al. Investigation of the influence of process parameters on dimensional accuracy and post-sintering crack formation in ceramic 3D printing for porcelain-based commercial resins. Prog Addit Manuf 8, 891–906 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00363-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00363-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation