Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Different Protection Systems to Control the Geomembrane Deformations in Liner Applications

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In landfill backfill systems and mining tailings piles, it is required to use a protective layer above the geomembrane to prevent physical damage from the overlying granular drainage layer. In this work, an experimental study was carried out to evaluate the deformed surface of a 2-mm-thick HDPE geomembrane from a coarse drainage gravel overlying when placed above a clayed underliner subjected to loads of 600 kPa and 1800 kPa over 100 h. Four nonwoven PP-type geotextiles with a mass per unit area ranging from 550 to 1300 g/m2 and a layer of 100 mm of clay placed above the geomembrane were tested as protection layers. A machine of reading by coordinates with a grid of 1 mm was used to develop a contour map and the strains were calculated for the whole geomembrane deformed surface in percentage. The results showed that the geomembrane presented puncture and large tensile strain values without protection. The clayed soil was the only protection limiting the tensile strains below the proposed limits. It was verified that at high pressure, the geotextile protection could not avoid a puncture, and although the double nonwoven geotextile reduced the strain values, the GMB area exhibiting strain above the proposed limit was too high and could lead to long-term failure. Even with a lower applied load, the single geotextile protection had 30% of the geomembrane area exceeding the 3% strain threshold. On the other hand, the double geotextile showed a performance improvement presenting 14% of the area exceeding the proposed limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data Availability

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Rowe RK (2005) Long-term performance of contaminant barrier systems. Geotechnique 55(9):631–678. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.9.631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleming IR, Rowe RK (2004) Laboratory studies of clogging of landfill leachate collection and drainage systems. Can Geotech J 41:134–153. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rowe RK, Fan J (2022) A general solution for leakage through geomembrane defects overlain by saturated tailings and underlain by highly permeable subgrade. Geotext Geomembr 50:694–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcotte BA, Fleming IR (2020) Damage to geomembrane liners from tire derived aggregate. Geotext Geomembr 48:198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Narejo DB, Koerner RM, Wilson-Fahmy RF (1996) Puncture protection of geomembranes Part II: experimental. Geosynth Int 3(5):629–653. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.3.0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gudina S, Brachman RWI (2006) Physical response of geomembrane wrinkles overlying compacted clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(10):1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1090-02412006132:101346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickinson S, Brachman RWI (2006) Deformations of a geosynthetic clay liner beneath a geomembrane wrinkle and coarse gravel. Geotext Geomembr 24:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tognon AR, Rowe RK, Moore ID (2000) Geomembrane strain observed in large-scale testing of protection layers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(12):1194–1208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:12(1194)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdelaal FB, Rowe RK, Brachman RWI (2014) Brittle rupture of an aged HPDE geomembrane at local gravel indentations under simulated field conditions. Geosynth Int 21:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brachman RWI, Asce M, Sabir A (2013) Long-term assessment of a layered-geotextile protection layer for geomembranes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(5):752–764. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hornsey WP, Wishaw DM (2012) Development of a methodology for the evaluation of geomembrane strain and relative performance of cushion geotextiles. Geotext Geomembranes 35:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eldesouky HMG, Brachman RWI (2018) Calculating local geomembrane strains from a single gravel particle with thin plate theory. Geotext Geomembr 46:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eldesouky HMG, Brachman RWI (2023) Calculating local geomembrane strains from gravel particle indentations with thin plate theory. Geotext Geomembr 51:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seeger S, Muller W (1996) Requirements and testing of protective layer systems for geomembranes. Geotext Geomembr 14:365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(96)89792-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peggs ID, Schmucker B, Carey P (2005) Assessment of maximum allowable strains in polyethylene and polypropylene geomembranes. In: Proc, Geo- frontiers 2005, Austin, Texas. https://doi.org/10.1061/40789(168)23

  16. Rowe RK, Yu Y (2019) Magnitude and significance of tensile strains in geomembrane landfill liners. Geotext Geomembr 47:439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zanzinger H (1999) Efficiency of geosynthetic protection layers for geomembrane liners: performance in a large-scale model test. Geosynth Int 6(4):303–317. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.6.0155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brachman RWI, Gudina S (2008) Gravel contacts and geomembrane strains for a GM/CCL composite liner. Geotext Geomembr 26:448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiel R, Smith ME (2004) State of the practice review of heap leach pad design issues. Geotext Geomembr 22:555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lupo JF (2010) Liner system design for heap leach pads. Geotext Geomembr 28:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lupo JF, Morrison KF (2007) Geosynthetic design and construction approaches in the mining industry. Geotext Geomembr 25:96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabir A, Brachman RWI (2012) Time and temperature effects on geomembrane strain from a gravel particle subjected to sustained vertical force. Can Geotech J 49:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1139/T11-096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcotte BA, Fleming IR (2019) The role of undrained clay soil subgrade properties in controlling deformations in geomembranes. Geotext Geomembr 47:327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickinson S, Brachman RWI (2008) Assessment of alternative protection layers for a geomembrane - geosynthetic clay liner (GM-GCL) composite liner. Can Geotech J 45:1594–1610. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brachman RWI, Rowe RK, Irfan H (2014) Short-term local tensile strains in HDPE heap leach geomembranes from coarse overliner materials. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(5):04014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowe RK, Brachman RWI, Irfan H et al (2013) Effect of underliner on geomembrane strains in heap leach applications. Geotext Geomembr 40:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koerner GR, Koerner RM (2011) Puncture resistance of polyester (PET) and polypropylene (PP) needle-punched nonwoven geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 29:360–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Abreu AES, Vilar OM (2016) Accessing the biological stability of municipal solid waste of different landfilling ages. J Solid Waste Technol Mngmnt 42:236–244. https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2016.236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Giroud JP (2016) Leakage control using geomembrane liners. S&R 39(3):213–253. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.393213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the following institutions that supported the research activities reported in this paper in different ways: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and University of São Paulo (USP), and CAPES–Brazilian Ministry of Education. The authors also thank the manufacturer of geosynthetics TDM Brazil and Mexichem Brazil–Bidim for providing information and materials presented in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guaratinguetá Faculty of Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha, n° 333, Portal das Colinas, Guaratinguetá, SP, 12.516-410, Brazil

    Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo Pedroso

  2. São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Trabalhador São-carlense, n° 400, Pq Arnold Schimidt, São Carlos, SP, 13.566-590, Brazil

    Jefferson Lins da Silva

Authors
  1. Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo Pedroso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jefferson Lins da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo Pedroso.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pedroso, G.O.M., Lins da Silva, J. Evaluation of Different Protection Systems to Control the Geomembrane Deformations in Liner Applications. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 9, 36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00455-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00455-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation