Abstract
Purpose
Knee joint is an important part of human body. People with poor knee condition generally have limited physical movement, rendering to mental stress and agony. Current technology to support the knee diagnosis and treatment procedures are limited to the use of manual goniometer, x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Alternative devices with continuous measurement capability for knee monitoring are minimum at this time, mainly due to the difficulties to cover the wide angle of the knee flexion. X-ray and MRI technologies are useful to have some insight on the knee problem, but they are not applicable for continuous monitoring. Aside from being expensive for general use of MRI, x-ray on the other hand can cause short-term side effects due to radiation exposure.
Methods
The method aimed in this paper is to demonstrate the use of optical sensor integrated with mechanical gear system as a knee monitoring device. A plastic compartment, made by using 3D printer is used to place the sensor and the gear system. The design of the overall device allows direct attachment on a knee brace for easy placement on the knee.
Results
Based on current study, the proposed sensor has a range of motion between 0 deg. to 160 deg., 0.08 deg. resolution as well as support continuous monitoring of the knee.
Conclusion
The sensor performance has been demonstrated for gait motion, ascending and descending stairs, sit-to-stand movement and maximum knee flexion applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang, Y., & Jordan, J. M. (Aug 2010). Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. Vol. 26(3), pp. 355–369
Altman, R. D. (2010). Early management of osteoarthritis, American Journal of Managed Care. Mar Vol. 16(2), pp. S41–S47
Bliddal, H., & Christensen, R. The treatment and prevention of knee osteoarthritis: a tool for clinical decision-making.Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. June 2009, Vol. 10(11), pp.1793–1804
Lespasio, M. J., Piuzzi, N. S., Husni, M. E., Muschler, G. F., Guarino, A. J., & Mont, M. A. Knee osteoarthritis: a primer.The Permanente Journal. Sept 2017, Vol. 21,16–183
Abbott, J. H., Robertson, M. C., McKenzie, J. E., Baxter, G. D., Theis, J., & Campbell, A. J. (2009). Exercise therapy, manual therapy, or both, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a factorial randomised controlled trial protocol. Trials Journal, Feb, 10(1), 1–12
Salim, G. M., & Zawawi, M. A. (2020). Mathematical Representation of Joint Angle Measurement using Step Index Optic Fibre and Linear Array Photodiode Sensor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1529 pp. 042089
Salim, G. M., Zawawi, M. A., & Novel, A. (2020). Implementation of Knee Joint Monitoring Device using Step Index Optical Fibre and Linear Array Photodiode Sensor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1529 pp. 042069
Myles, C. M., Rowe, P. J., Walker, C. R. C., & Nutton, R. W. (2002). Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait & Posture, 16(1), 46–54
Rowe, P. J., Myles, C. M., Walker, C., & Nutton, R. (2000). Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: How much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture, 12(2), 143–155
Tully, E. A., Fotoohabadi, M. R., & Galea, M. P. (2005). Sagittal spine and lower limb movement during sit-to-stand in healthy young subjects. Gait Posture, 22(4), 338–345
Devers, B. N., Conditt, M. A., Jamieson, M. L., Driscoll, M. D., Noble, P. C., & Parsley, B. S. (2011). Does greater knee flexion increase patient function and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty? Journal of Arthroplasty, 26(2), 178–186
Scott, A. P. Knee Braces: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations for Their Use, American Family Physician Available online: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2000/0115/p411.html
Riskowski, J. L., Mikesky, A. E., Bahamonde, R. E., & Burr, D. B. (2009). Design and Validation of a Knee Brace with Feedback to Reduce the Rate of Loading.Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 131(8), pp. 084503 (6 pages)
Trappler, R., Smith, E., Goldberg, G., Parvizi, J., & Hozack, W. J. Knee Range of Motion: Can we believe the Goniometer Reading?. Orthopaedic Proceedings, Vol 91-B, SUPP_I, 6–6
Clapper, M. P., & Wolf, S. L. Comparison of the Reliability of the Orthoranger and the Standard Goniometer for Assessing Active Lower Extremity Range of Motion.Physical Therapy, Feb 1988, Vol. 68(2), pp.214–218
Stupar, D. Z., Bajic, J. S., Manojlovic, L. M., Slankamenac, M. P., Joza, A. V., & Zivanov, M. B. (2012). Wearable Low-Cost System for Human Joint Movements Monitoring Based on Fibre-Optic Curvature Sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal, 12(12), 3424–3431
Zawawi, M. A., & O’Keeffe, S. (2015). An Extrinsic Optical Fibre Bending Sensor: A Theoretical Investigation and Validation. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(9), 5333–5339
Abro, Z. A., Yi-Fan, Z., Cheng-Yu, H., Lakho, R. A., & Nan-Liang, C. (2018). Development of a Smart Garment for Monitoring Body Postures based on FBG and Flex Sensing Technologies. Sensors and Actuators A, 272, 153–160
Massimiliano Donno (August 2008). A New Flexible Optical Fiber Goniometer for Dynamic Angular Measurements: Application to Human Joint Movement Monitoring,IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 57, No. 8,
Andressa, & Rezende (2018). Polymer Optical Fiber Goniometer: A New Portable, Low Cost and Reliable Sensor for Joint Analysis. Sensors, 18(12), 4293
Salim, G. M., & Zawawi, M. A. (2020). Knee Monitoring Device Based on Optical Sensor Embedded in Mechanical Compartment Assembly, Optik (Elsevier). Vol. 223, Dec pp. 165546
Hemmerich, A., Brown, H., Smith, S., Marthandam, S. S., & Wyss, U. P. (2006). Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 24(4), 770–781
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) and Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) for the funding awarded to the author to complete this study under the national grant reference number: FRGS/1/2019/TK04/UMP/02/18 (FRGS) and RDU1901218 (UMP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Future Work
To further validate the sensor’s clinical applicability of the proposed optical based sensor by comparing its results with Vicon system (3D motion analysis). Other than that, to fabricate a smaller and finer mechanical components (gear and rack shaft) using accurate CNC machining to produce a smaller and lighter overall sensor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salim, G.M., Zawawi, M.A. Optical Sensor Assembly on knee Brace for continuous knee monitoring application. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 42, 595–603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00708-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00708-5