Skip to main content
Log in

Design of Shimming Rings for Small Permanent MRI Magnet Using Sensitivity-Analysis-Based Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main magnet in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system creates a static magnetic field that determines the final imaging quality. In a permanent MRI system, shimming rings are commonly used to improve field homogeneity. However, the optimization of the ring structure is challenging owing to the nonlinear properties of the ferromagnetic material. To design a small permanent magnet system, this study explores the application of sensitivity analysis (SA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for the optimization of shimming rings. SA is used to identify the most important parameter of the shimming rings that affects the quality of the magnetic field to simplify the optimization process and improve optimization accuracy and efficiency. PSO is used to solve the complex and nonlinear optimizations of the magnetic field. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, a specific permanent MRI magnet was modeled. The results show that the inner radius of the shimming ring crucially affects magnetic field quality, with ring height having relatively smaller impact. Compared with the PSO-only optimization procedure, the combined SA-PSO optimization more rapidly converges to a better solution. The optimized shimming rings significantly improve the magnetic field uniformity (~10 fold) compared with that of the initial magnet without shimming rings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raich, H., & Blümler, P. (2004). Design and construction of a dipolar Halbach array with a homogeneous field from identical bar magnets: NMR Mandhalas. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, 23, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kato, H., Kishi, K., Takahashi, N., Asaumi, J. I., Honda, Y., Yanagi, Y., & Aoki, M. (2008). A design of permanent magnet array for unilateral NMR device. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, 33, 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moresi, G., & Magin, R. (2003). Miniature permanent magnet for table-top NMR. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, 19, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anferova, S., Anferov, V., Rata, D., Blümich, B., Arnold, J., Clauser, C., et al. (2004). A mobile NMR device for measurements of porosity and pore size distributions of drilled core samples. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B, 23, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, D., & Marcinek, D. (2009). Noninvasive in vivo small animal MRI and MRS: Basic experimental procedures. Journal of visualized experiments, 20(32), e1592.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Podol’skii, A. (2000). Design procedure for permanent magnet assemblies with uniform magnetic fields for MRI devices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 36, 484–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Juchem, C., Muller-Bierl, B., Schick, F., Logothetis, N. K., & Pfeuffer, J. (2006). Combined passive and active shimming for in vivo MR spectroscopy at high magnetic fields. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 183, 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryu, J. S., Yao, Y., Koh, C. S., Yun, S., & Kim, D. S. (2005). Optimal shape design of 3-D nonlinear electromagnetic devices using parameterized design sensitivity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 41, 1792–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanchez Lopez, H., Liu, F., Weber, E., & Crozier, S. (2008). Passive shim design and a shimming approach for biplanar permanent magnetic resonance imaging magnets. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 44, 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tadic, T., & Fallone, B. G. (2010). Design and optimization of a novel bored biplanar permanent-magnet assembly for hybrid magnetic resonance imaging systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 46, 4052–4058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tadic, T., & Fallone, B. G. (2011). Three-dimensional nonaxisymmetric pole piece shape optimization for biplanar permanent-magnet MRI systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 47, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fesanghary, M., Damangir, E., & Soleimani, I. (2009). Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using global sensitivity analysis and harmony search algorithm. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29, 1026–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Homma, T., & Saltelli, A. (1996). Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 52, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, J. (2011). Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26, 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, Q. K., Fatih Tasgetiren, M., & Liang, Y. C. (2008). A discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for the no-wait flowshop scheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research, 35, 2807–2839.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Im, S. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55, 271–280.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan, K., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (1997) Sensitivity analysis of model output: Variance-based methods make the difference. In Proceedings of the 29th Winter simulation Conference, (pp. 261–268).

  18. Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145, 280–297.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks, 1942–1948.

  20. AlRashidi, M., & El-Hawary, M. (2009). A survey of particle swarm optimization applications in electric power systems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13, 913–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. del Valle, Y., Venayagamoorthy, G. K., Mohagheghi, S., Hernandez, J. C., & Harley, R. G. (2008). Particle swarm optimization: Basic concepts, variants and applications in power systems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marble, A. E., Mastikhin, I. V., Colpitts, B. G., & Balcom, B. J. (2005). An analytical methodology for magnetic field control in unilateral NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 174, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marble, A. E., Mastikhin, I. V., Colpitts, B. G., & Balcom, B. J. (2007). Designing static fields for unilateral magnetic resonance by a scalar potential approach. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 43, 1903–1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the 973 National Basic Research & Development Program of China (2010CB732502) and the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China (2011BAI12B01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., He, W., Xia, L. et al. Design of Shimming Rings for Small Permanent MRI Magnet Using Sensitivity-Analysis-Based Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 35, 448–454 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0051-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0051-6

Keywords

Navigation