Abstract
To have multiple perspectives for analyzing an economy is valuable in and of itself. For the complex system economy, they offer ways for researchers and students alike for developing a more nuanced understanding of socio-economic structures than the economics mainstream framework can accommodate. They allow us to conceptualize economic activity in different ways and show different aspects of economic activities. They can help develop policy frameworks that may permit a more versatile, and also more targeted, set of options for influencing economic processes. They can support the development of differing positions when we consider how to evaluate economic processes and the output range which they produce. For students, learning different perspectives for thinking about how an economy functions, about the role of economic activity and how it is embedded in a physical and social environment can offer numerous advantages over an instruction that is solely focused on one specific perspective and its positive and normative positions. Evolutionary perspectives on economic education and analyses provide an analytical framework that can accommodate the above aspects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99(394):116–131
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books
Beinhocker E (2006) The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Random House Business
Boldeman L (2007) The Cult of the Market: Economics Fundamentalism and Its Discontents. ANU E Press
Bowles S, Halliday SD (2022) Microeconomics: competition, conflict, and coordination. Oxford University Press
Carpataux J, Crevoisier O (2007) Economic theories and spatial transformations—clarifying the space-time premises and outcomes of economic theories. J Econ Geogr 7(3):285–309
Carrión Álvarez M, Ehnts D (2016) Samuelson and davidson on ergodicity: a reformulation. J Post-Keynesian Econ 39(1):1–16
Chester L (2021) Can régulation theory inform institutional analyses of contemporary social provisioning? J Econ Issues 55(2):359–366
Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44
Colander D, Kupers R (2014) Complexity and the art of public policy: solving society’s problems from the bottom up. Princeton University Press
Deane K, van Waeyenberge E, Maxwell R (2019) Recharting the history of economic thought: approaches to and student experiences of the introduction of pluralist teaching in undergraduate economics curriculum. Int J Plur Econ Educ 10(2):137–154
Denis A (2009) Editorial: pluralism in economics education. Int Rev Econ Educ 8(2):6–22
Dominguez Lacasa I (2019) Technology and institutions in neo-schumpeterian and institutional thinking. Wissenschaftliche Beitrage TH Wildau 23:95–101
Elsner W, Heinrich T, Schwardt H (2014) The microeconomics of complex economies: evolutionary, institutional, neoclassical, and complexity perspectives. Academic Press
Engels, F (1844). Outline of a critique of political economy, the marx/engels internet archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/df-jahrbucher/outlines.htm. Accessed 17 Feb 2024
Focardi SM (2015) Is Economics an empirical science? If not, can it become one? Front Appl Math Stat. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2015.00007/full#h2
Gräbner C, Strunk B (2020) Pluralism in economics: its critique and their lessons. J Econ Methodol 27(4):311–329
Harcourt GC (1972) Some cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge University Press
Heise A (2020) Ideology and pluralism in economics: a german view. Int J Plur Econ Educ 11(2):114–129
Jo TH (2021) A veblenian critique of nelson and winter’s evolutionary economy. J Econ Issues 55(4):1101–1117
Kauffman S (1993) The origins of order, self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press
Keen S (2001) Debunking economics—the naked emperor of the social sciences. Zed Books
Lee FS (1998) Post-keynesian price theory. Cambridge University Press
Lee FS, Jo TH (2018) Microeconomic theory: a heterodox approach. Routledge
Lindgren K (1991) Evolutionary Phenomena in Simple Dynamics. In: Langton CG, Taylor C, Farmer JD, Rasmussen S (eds) Artificial life II, SFI studies in the sciences of complexity. Addison-Wesley
Lipsey RG, Lancaster K (1956) The general theory of the second best. Rev Econ Stud 24(1):11–32
Marshall A 1920 (2013) Principles of economics (Palgrave classics in economics). Palgrave Macmillan
Mearman A, Wakeley T, Shoib G, Webber D (2011) Does pluralism in economics education make better educated, happier students? A qualitative analysis. Int Rev Econ Educ 11(2):50–62
Mirowski P (1991) More heat than light: economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press
Packard MD, Bylund PL, Clark BB (2021) Keynes and knight on uncertainty: peas in a pod or chalk and cheese. Camb J Econ 45:1099–1125
Robinson J (1982) Spring cleaning. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG 8(2):175–182
Romer P (2016) The trouble with macroeconomics. https://paulromer.net/trouble-with-macroeconomics-update/WP-Trouble.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2024
Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development—an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies
Schumpeter JA (2003) Capitalism socialism and democracy. Routledge
Schwardt H (2022) Technology and social rules and norms in neo-schumpeterian economics and in original institutional economics. PSL Quart Rev 75(303):385–401
Sent EM (2005) Simplifying herbert simon. History Political Econ 37(2):227–232
Shaikh A (1974) Laws of production and laws of algebra: the humbug production function. Rev Econ Stat 56(1):115–120
Simon HA (1977) Models of discovery and other topics in the methods of science. Springer, Dordrecht
Simon HA (1993) Decision making: rational, nonrational, and irrational. Educ Adm Q 29(3):392–411
Sraffa P (1926) The laws of returns under competitive conditions. Econ J 36(144):535–550
Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):291–330
Stigler G (1957) Perfect competition, historically contemplated. J Polit Econ 65(1):1–17
Stiglitz J (2001) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics, prize lecture, December 8, 2001, https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/stiglitz-lecture.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2024
Stiglitz J (2018) Where modern macroeconomics went wrong. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 34(1–2):70–106
Tafner G, Caasper M (2022) Understanding economics does not equal understanding the economy: designing teacher education from a socio-economic perspective. Int J Plur Econ Educ 13(3):277–296
Veblen TB (1898) Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Q J Econ 12(4):373–397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Schwardt, H. Evolutionary alternatives to equilibrium frameworks in economics education. Evolut Inst Econ Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-024-00275-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-024-00275-1