Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation patterns in firms and intra-industry heterogeneity empirical evidence from Turkey

  • Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to explore sector-level sources of intra-industry heterogeneity of innovation patterns among Turkish firms. We constructed a taxonomy of innovative firms and explored the different modes of innovation. We then analyzed the sector-level determinants of intra-industry heterogeneity. Analysis results indicate that groups of firms within the same sector that display distinct innovation characteristics and firm’s resource position, knowledge base, and cooperation behavior have a bearing on firms’ innovative characteristics. Furthermore, our analysis shows that variables related to variety generation within a sector increase heterogeneity. In contrast, larger average firm size or concentration of firms that belong to a group reduces heterogeneity in that sector. Our analysis results show that firms with distinct innovative characteristics populate the sectors. Therefore, sectoral innovation policies should target specific groups rather than emphasizing innovation typologies based on vague abstractions. Moreover, heterogeneity of innovative behavior can be a risk-mitigation tool to control the adverse effects of path dependency and lock-in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amit R, Shoemaker PJ (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strat Manag J 14:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (2004) Population thinking, Price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evolut Inst EconRev 1(1):127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D (2001) Pavitt’s taxonomy sixteen years on: a review article. Econ Innov New Technol 10:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D, Cesaratto S, Sirilli G (1991) Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization. Res Policy 20:357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis S, Hollenstein H (1997) Innovative activity and firm characteristics—a cluster analysis with firm-level data of Swiss manufacturing. In: 25th annual conference of the European Association for research in industrial economics. Copenhagen

  • Audretsch D (1997) Technological regimes, industrial demography and the evolution of industrial structures. Ind Corp Chang 6:49–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch DB, Mahmood T (1994) Firm selection and industry evolution: the post-entry performance of new firms. J Evol Econ 4:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballot G, Taymaz E (1999) Technological change, learning and macro-economic coordination: an evolutionary model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 2(2):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manag Sci 32:1231–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB, Clark DN (2007) Resource-based theory. Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman E, Scarpetta S, Schivardi F (2005) Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Ind Corp Chang 14(3):365–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti G, Stoneman P (2010) How innovative are UK firms? Evidence from the fourth UK community innovation survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations. Br J Manag 21:187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker MC (2004) The concept of routines twenty years after Nelson and Winter (1982): a review of the literature. Ind Corp Chang 13:643–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellone F, Musso P, Nesta L, Quéré M (2008) Market selection along the firm life cycle. Ind Corp Chang 17(4):753–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi S, Malerba F, Orsenigo L (2000) Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Econ J 10:388–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata. Stata Press Publication, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci F (2008) Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Res Policy 39:1139–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaratto S, Mangano S (1993) Technological profiles and economic performance in the Italian manufacturing sector. Econ Innov New Technol 2:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiraromonte F, Dosi G (1993) Heterogeneity, change and macroeconomic dynamics. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 4:39–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Klepper S (1992) The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Bus Econ 4:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Malerba F (2001) Is the tendency to variation a chief cause of progress? Ind Corp Chang 10:587–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong JP, Marsili O (2006) The fruit flies of innovations: a taxonomy of innovative small firms. Res Policy 35:213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decarolis DM, Deeds DL (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organisational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strateg Manag J 20:953–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 25:1504–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (2005) Statistical regularities in the evolution of industries: a guide through some evidence and challenges for the theory. LEM working paper series 2005/17

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista R (2000) Sectoral patterns of technological change in services. Econ Innov New Technol 9:183–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (1996) Knowledge based approaches to the theory of the firm: some critical comments. Organ Sci 7:470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss K, Foss N (1998) The knowledge based-approach: an organizational economics perspective. Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenz M, Lambert R (2010) Exploring non-technological and mixed modes of innovation. Innovation in firms: a microeconomic perspective. OECD, Paris, pp 69–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Andreas S (2004) The distribution and heterogeneity of technical efficiency within industries: an empirical assessment. Freiberg working papers 2004–12

  • Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33:114–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilliches Z, Mairesse J (1995) Production functions: the search for identification (NBER working paper series No:5067). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts

  • Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strateg Manag J 21:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manag J 32:1199–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2006) Why we need a generalized Darwinism, and why generalized Darwinism is not enough. J Econ Behav Organ 61:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook D, Cohen WM, Hounshell DA, Slepper S (2000) The nature, sources and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strateg Manag J 21:1017–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein H (2003) Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data. Res Policy 32:845–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett M, Ramesh M (2003) Studying public policy: cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwai K (1984) Schumpeterian dynamics I and II. J Econ Behav Organ 5:321–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MB, Johnson B, Lorenz E, Lundvall BA (2007) Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Res Policy 36:680–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick AK, Levin RC, Nelson RR, Winter SG (1995) On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Res Policy 24:185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organisation Science 3:383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laranja M, Uyarra E, Flanagan K (2008) Policies for science, technology and innovation: translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Res Policy 37(5):823–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen A, Drejer I (2007) What exactly are technological regimes? Intra-Industry heterogeneity in the organisation of innovation activities. Res Policy 36:1221–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strateg Manag J 31:224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manag Sci 43:934–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linzer DA, Lewis JB (2011) poLCA: an R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. J Stat Softw 42(10):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui SS, Ngo H, Hon AH (2006) Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: mediating roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust. J Bus Res 59:466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Deng L (2009) Do birds of a feather flock higher? The effects of partner similarity on innovation in strategic alliances in knowledge-intensive industries. J Manag Stud 46(6):1005–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (1992) Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Econ J 102:845–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F (2005) Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson RR (eds) Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1993) Technological regimes and firm behavior. Ind Corp Chang 2:45–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1995) Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Camb J Econ 19:47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Orsenigo L (1996) The dynamics and evolution of industries. Ind Corp Chang 5:51–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsili O, Verspagen B (2002) Technology and the dynamics of industrial structure: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing. Ind Corp Chang 11:791–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan GW (1996) Clustering validation: Results and implications for applied analysis. In: Arabie P, Hubert LJ, de Soete G (eds) Classification and clustering. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, pp 341–375

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morlacchi P, Martin BR (2009) Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: a reflexive overview. Res Policy 38(4):571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1990) Capitalism as an engine of growth. Res Policy 19:193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura KG, Nakajima T, Kiyota K (2005) Does the natural selection mechanism still work in severe recessions? Examination of the Japanese economy in the 1990s. J Econ Behav Organ 58:53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13:343–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peneder M (2010) Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors. Res Policy 39:323–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage. a resource based view. Strateg Manag J 14:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters B (2009) Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence. J Technol Transf 34(2):226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pol E, Carroll P, Robertson PL (2002) A new typology for economic sectors with a view to policy implications. Econ Innov New Technol 11:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC (1996) How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test. Strateg Manag J 17:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt R (1991) How much does industry matter? Strateg Manag J 12:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti PP, Mani GS (1995) Competition, variety and technological evolution: a replicator dynamics model. J Evol Econ 5:369–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg G, Dosi G, Orsenigo L (1988) Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organisation model. Econ J 98:1032–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutaris V (2002) Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Res Policy 31:877–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender JC, Grant RM (1996) Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strateg Manag J 17:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srholec M, Verspagen B (2012) The Voyage of the Beagle into innovation: explorations on heterogeneity, selection, and sectors. Ind Corp Chang 21:1221–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz E (2005) Are small firms really less productive. Small Bus Econ 25(5):429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Ind Corp Chang 3:537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Belkum A, Struelens M, de Visser A, Vergrugh H, Tibayrenc M (2001) Role of genomic typing in taxonomy, evolutionary genetics, and microbial epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 14(3):547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1964) Economic ‘natural’ selection and the theory of the firm. Yale Econ Essays 4:225–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1971) Satisficing, selection and the innovating remnant. Q J Econ 85:237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1984) Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. J Econ Behav Organ 5:287–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1990) Survival, selection, and inheritance in evolutionary theories of organisation. In: Singh JV (ed) Organisational evolution—new directions. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 269–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (2008) What is specific about evolutionary economics? J Evol Econ 18:547–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woerter M (2009) Industry diversity and its impact on the innovation performance of firms: an empirical analysis based on panel data (firm-level). J Evol Econ 19:675–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Ataturk Blv. No: 221, Kavaklidere, 06100, Ankara, Turkey

    Alp Eren Yurtseven

  2. Science and Technology Policies Research Centre, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Mehmet Teoman Pamukçu

Authors
  1. Alp Eren Yurtseven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehmet Teoman Pamukçu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alp Eren Yurtseven.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. The views and interpretations expressed here belong to the authors and cannot be attributed to the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, its affiliated organizations or any other individual acting on behalf of these organizations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6 Sectoral distribution of firms between 2004 and 2008
Full size table
Table 7 Goodness of fit indicators for latent class analysis
Full size table

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurtseven, A.E., Pamukçu, M.T. Innovation patterns in firms and intra-industry heterogeneity empirical evidence from Turkey. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 19, 645–679 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-022-00236-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-022-00236-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation