Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived organizational climate and whistleblowing intention in academic organizations: evidence from Selçuk University (Turkey)

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Eurasian Business Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between organizational climate drivers and whistleblowing intention through a cross-sectional study in Selçuk University in Turkey. Contrary to our expectations, the findings do not fully support the existing literature and the hypotheses underpinning this research. While the work environment in faculties and institutes of Selçuk University seems to portray an overall positive organizational climate, lecturers, researchers, and research assistants have expressed a deep reluctance in the likelihood to sound the alarm in case they witness wrongdoings and malpractices committed by their supervisors and fellow colleagues. The investigation reveals that some organizational climate drivers such as organizational justice, morale, leader credibility and mobbing are consistently associated with informal whistleblowing intention while only individual autonomy is bound with formal whistleblowing intention. Nevertheless, the outputs highlight individual autonomy and morale to have negative impact on whistleblowing intention which is opposite to our expectation. Furthermore, the findings do not support the assumption relating to the mediating role of trust and safety climate in the relationship between organizational climate drivers and whistleblowing intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, A., Deitinger, P., Nardella, C., & Bonafede, M. (2008). A tool for assessing the risk of mobbing in organizational environments: The “Val.Mob.” Scale. Prevention Today, 4(3), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • AL-Abr row, H. A., Ardakani, M. S., Harooni, A., & Moghaddam pour, H. (2013). The relationship between organizational trust and organizational justice components and their role in job involvement in education. International Journal of Management Academy, 1(1), 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zu’bi, H. A. (2010). A study of relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & Roy, S. (2014). Examining the dynamics of whistleblowing: A causal approach. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 13(2), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouville, M. (2007). Whistle-blowing and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, N., & Kelly, J. (2007). A study of whistleblowing among trainee auditors. British Accounting Review, 39(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2004). The impact of organizational climate and strategic fit on firm performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrom, N., & Corbridge, J. (1997). A tool to assess aspects of an organisations health & safety climate. In Proceedings of International Conference on Safety Culture in the Energy Industries. Münich: University of Aberdeen.

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, Trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1183–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1996). Some paradoxes of whistleblowing. Business Professional Ethics Journal, 15(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, D. W., & Kleiman, L. S. (2001). Job Tenure as a moderator of the relationship between autonomy and satisfaction. Applied Human Resources Management Research, 6(2), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, G. A., & Von Gilmer, H. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 62(6), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., & Beall, J. (2014). Advice for plagiarism whistleblowers. Ethics and Behavior, 24(5), 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökçe, A. T. (2013). Relationship between whistleblowing and job satisfaction and organizational loyalty at schools in Turkey. Global Science Research Journals, 1(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gül, H., & Özcan, N. (2011). Mobbing ve Örgütsel Sessizlik Arasındaki İlişkiler: Karaman İl Özel İdaresinde Görgül Bir Çalışma. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacıcaferoğlu, S., & Gündoğdu, C. (2013). Determining the validity and the reliability of the mobbing scale for the football referees. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 1(4), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, B. (2009). Morale: Definitions, Dimensions, and Measurement. Cambridge: Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy in Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge.

  • Huang, C.-F., Lo, K.-L., & Wu, C.-F. (2013). Ethical climate and whistle-blowing: An empirical study of taiwan’s construction industry. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 29(5), 681–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islamoğlu, G., Birsel, M., & Boru, D. (2012). Trust scale development in Turkey (pp. 1–15). Berlin: E-Leader.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Choi, C. C., Ko, C.-H. E., McNeil, P. K., Minton, M. K., Wright, M. A., & Kim, K.-I. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating Work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 739–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). the experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., & Tyler, T. (1995). The occupational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations (pp. 302–330). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwin, C. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, Y., & Frenkel, D. A. (2002). Mobility and loyalty in labour relations: An Israeli case. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masaka, D. (2007). Whistleblowing in the context of zimbabwe’s economic crisis. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(2), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1985). Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology, 38(3), 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. H. (2014). The pendulum effect: Comparisons between the snowden revelations and the church committee: What are the potential implications for Europe? Information & Communications Technology Law, 2(3), 192–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R., Petkas, P., & Blackwell, K. (1972). Whistle blowing. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., Baucus, M. S., & Miceli, M. P. (1993). The relationship between values and practice organizational climates for wrongdoing. Administration & Society, 25(2), 204–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., et al. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Suárez, E., Muñiz, J., Campillo-Álvarez, A., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & García-Cueto, E. (2013). Assessing organizational climate: Psychometric properties of the CLIOR Scale. Psicothema, 25(1), 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perks, S., & Smith, E. E. (2008). Employee perceptions regarding whistle-blowing in the workplace: A South African perspective. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(2), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, S., Reddy, P. S., & Morgan, D. (2017). Institutional isomorphism and whistle-blowing intentions in public sector institutions. Public Management Review, 19(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnu, C. H., Naidu, K., & Zamri, W. (2008). Determinants of whistle blowing. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(1), 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch, J. R. (1990). Climate and culture: Interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedy, M. K., & Sperduto, K. (2014). At-will fiduciaries: The anomalies of a duty of loyalty in the twenty-first century. Nebraska Law Review, 93(2), 267–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, J. (2013). The fate of whistleblowers in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 885–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G. R., & Baldwin, N. J. (2007). Whistle-blowing and the code of silence in police agencies policy and structural predictors. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio, D. B., & Sobral, F. (2013). Speak now or forever hold your peace? An essay on whistleblowing and its interfaces with the Brazilian culture. Brazilian Administration Review, 10(4), 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D. L., Stammerjohan, W. W., & Martin, R. B. (2014). Trust, organizational justice, and whistleblowing: A research note. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, R., & Litwin, G. (1968). Organizational climate: Explorations of a concept. Boston: Harvard University- Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, H. T., & Grodzinsky, F. S. (2014). Trust, betrayal, and whistle-blowing: reflections on the Edward Snowden case. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 44(3), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, H. T., & Yavuz, K. (2015). Test of complicity theory: is external whistleblowing a strategic outcome of negative I/O psychology. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(18), 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waytz, A., Dungan, J., & Young, L. (2013). The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness-loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1027–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, A. R., Biggs, H. C., & Watson, B. (2005). Analysis of a safety climate measure for occupational vehicle drivers and implications for safer workplaces. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 11(1), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, S. (2000). Nurses and whistleblowing: The ethical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(5), 1051–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, E. (2009). The Validity and reliability of the mobbing scale (MS). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(2), 981–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, T.-J. (2009). The relationship between organizational trust and occupational commitment of volunteers. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 5(1), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Abodohoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iko Afe, C.E., Abodohoui, A., Mebounou, T.G.C. et al. Perceived organizational climate and whistleblowing intention in academic organizations: evidence from Selçuk University (Turkey). Eurasian Bus Rev 9, 299–318 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-018-0110-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-018-0110-3

Keywords

Navigation