Abstract
Flood is ranked as the deadliest natural disaster that has been experienced by the urban basins in the world. Its detrimental effects can be minimized by appropriate modeling, analysis and management methods. Such modeling and analysis techniques help in flood risk assessment predicting flood occurrence, aid in the emergency preparation for evacuation and reduce damage from the impact of floods. Numerous modeling techniques are available for analyzing flood events, of which HEC-HMS software is chosen for this explorative study because of its simplicity and as it is a freely available open-source software. The present study aims to develop a rainfall–runoff simulation model by generating peak flow and volume of the extreme rainfall event that occurred on 22 November 1999 in the ungauged Koraiyar basin located south of Tiruchirappalli City in South India. The hydrographs are generated for the basin by using specified hyetograph and frequency storm method to identify the best method to be adopted in the study. Digital elevation model processed with geographic information system (GIS) and HEC-Geo HMS, which is an extension of GIS, is used for the analysis. Using the terrain processing tools in ArcGIS, the basin delineation and parameters such as slope and river length are extracted from the basin. The data generated during the HEC-Geo HMS process are the hydrologic parameters of Koraiyar basin, and it is imported to HEC-HMS modeling for generating peak flow and volume. In the modeling process, HEC-HMS has three modules, namely transform, loss and base flow. SCS curve number and SCS unit hydrograph are used to determine the losses and transformation of rainfall into the runoff process in the present study. The SCS method is adopted because of its simplicity and requirement of limited data approach for modeling. The peak flow and volume prepared from the model are compared with the standard Nash–Sutcliffe values. The frequency storm method has a Nash value of 0.7, which is higher than the value obtained from the specified hyetograph process, and it is chosen as a better model for generating flood peak and volume for different return periods in the basin. It can therefore be adopted for other studies of similar basin conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-zahrani M, Al-areeq A, Sharif HO (2017) Estimating urban flooding potential near the outlet of an arid catchment in Saudi Arabia. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):672–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1255668
Bakir M, Xingnan Z (2008) Gis based hydrological modeling : a comparative study of HEC-HMS and the Xinan Jiang Model. In: Twelfth international water technology conference, IWTC12 2008.Alexandria, Egypt, vol 111.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229035685_GISbased_hydrological_modelling_A_comparative_study_of_HEC-HMS_and_the_Xinanjiang_model
Bedient PB, Holder A, Benavides JA, Vieux BE (2003) Radar-based flood warning system applied to Tropical Storm Allison. J Hydrol Eng 8:308–318
Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69
Cahyono C, Adidarma Wanny K (2019) Influence analysis of peak rate factor in the flood events calibration process using HEC–HMS. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00625-8
Chadli K, Laadoua A, Harchaoui EN (2016) Runoff modeling of Sebou watershed (Morocco) using SCS curve number method and geographic information system. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0215-6
Derdour A, Bouanani A, Babahamed K (2018) Modeling rainfall-runoff relations using HEC-HMS in a semi-arid region : case study in Ain Sefra Watershed, Ksour Mountains (SW Algeria). J Water Land Dev 36(I–III):45–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/jwld-2018-0005 (PL ISSN 1429–7426)
Downer CW, Ogden FL, Martin WD, Harmon RS (2002) Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D. Hydrol Process 16:255–275
Du J, Qian L, Rui H, Zuo T, Zheng D, Youpeng X, Xu C-Y (2012) Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China. J Hydrol 464–465:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.057
Giandotti M (1934) Previsione delle piene e delle magre dei corsi d’acqua [Forecast of floods and lean waters]. Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato 8:107–117
Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R (2015) Annual disaster statistical review 2014: the numbers and trends. Brussels. CRED: 50. http://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/ADSR_2014.pdf
Halwatura D, Najim M (2013) Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environ Modell Softw 46:155–162
Kothyari UC, Garde RJ (1992) Rainfall intensity–duration–frequency formula for India. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 118:323–336. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:2(323)
Mandal SP, Chakrabarty A (2016) Flash flood risk assessment for upper Teesta river basin: using the hydrological modeling system (HEC-HMS) software. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0110-1
Marsik M, Waylen P (2006) An application of the distributed hydrologic model CASC2D to a tropical montane watershed. J Hydrol 330:481–495
Martin O, Rugumayo A, Ovcharovichova J (2012) Application of HEC HMS / RAS and Gis tools in flood modeling: a case study for river Sironko–Uganda. Glob J Eng Des Technol 1(2):19–31. https://www.longdom.org/articles/application-of-hec-hmsras-and-gis-tools-inflood-modeling-a-case-study-for-river-sironko--uganda.pdf
Meresa H (2019) Modelling of river flow in ungauged catchment using remote sensing data: application of the empirical (SCS-CN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Hydrological Model (HEC-HMS). Model Earth Syst Environ 5:257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0532-z
Morisai DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.532.2506&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Nash JE, Sutcliffe J (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual model. Part 1: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290
Ojha CSP, Berndtsson R, Bhunya P (2008) Engineering Hydrology. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Pil H, Chapman T, Doran D (1988) Problems of rainfall-runoff modeling in arid and semiarid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33:379–400
Ponce VM, Hawkins RH (1996) Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng ASCE 1:11–19
Rahman KU, Balkhair KS, Almazroui M, Masood A (2017) Sub-catchments flow losses computation using Muskingum-Cunge routing method and HEC-HMS GIS based techniques, case study of Wadi Al-Lith, Saudi Arabia. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0268-1
Ramly S, Tahir W (2016) Application of HEC-Geo-HMS and HEC-HMS as rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation. Springer Science + Business Media Singapore, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0500-8
Sampath D, Weerakoon S, Herath S (2015) HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment with intra-basin diversions case study of the Deduru Oya River Basin, Sri Lanka. Engineer 48(01):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v48i1.6843
Satheeshkumar S, Venkateswaran S, Kannan R (2017) Rainfall-runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub-basin, South India. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0301-4
Ternate JR, Celeste MI, Pineda EF, Tan FJ, Uy FA (2017) Floodplain modelling of Malaking-Ilog River in Southern Luzon, Philippines using LiDAR digital elevation model for the design of water-related structures . In: IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering vol 216, p 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/216/1/012044
USAC (2001) Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS User’s Manual. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis
USDA (1972) Soil Conservation Service, National Engineering Handbook. Hydrology Section 4. Chapters 4–10. USDA, Washington, DC
USDA-SCS (1974) Soil survey of Travis County, Texas. College Station, Tex.: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, and USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC
Wheater H, Butler A, Stewart E, Hamilton G (1991) A multivariate spatial-temporal model of rainfall in southwest Saudi Arabia. I. Spatial rainfall characteristics and model formulation. J Hydrol 125:175–199
Yamani K, Hazza A, Sekkoum M, Slimane T (2016) Mapping of vulnerability of flooded area in arid region. Case study: area of Ghardaı¨a-Algeria. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0183-x
Zope PE, Eldho TI, Jothiprakash V (2016) Development of rainfall intensity duration frequency curves for Mumbai City, India. J Water Resour Prot 8:756–765. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.87061
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Editorial Board and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, which had helped to improve the manuscript. The authors also would like to express their gratitude to the State Surface and Groundwater Data Centre, Chennai, for readily providing the rainfall data.
Funding
Nil—no supporting funds from the organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares there is no conflict.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natarajan, S., Radhakrishnan, N. Simulation of extreme event-based rainfall–runoff process of an urban catchment area using HEC-HMS. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 5, 1867–1881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00644-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00644-5