Abstract
Siblings may be our staunchest supporters as well as our most significant rivals. What factors shape these sibling relationships into ones of conflict versus closeness? Are conflict and closeness shaped by the same factors, occupying opposite ends of the same spectrum? Or are conflict and closeness independent of each other, being shaped by different factors? The current study examined conflict and closeness between siblings as a function of respondent sex; sex of sibling; genetic relatedness; age difference; time spent together; and perceived parental resemblance, investment, and favoritism. Results indicate the factors that shape conflict differ from those that shape closeness, suggesting they are not simply opposite ends of the same spectrum. While genetic relatedness, perceived parental favoritism, and sex of sibling relative to the respondent explained most of the variance in sibling conflict, most of the variance in sibling closeness was explained by time spent with the sibling and perceived sibling resemblance—not genetic relatedness. Furthermore, the factors examined in the study explained much more variance in closeness than in conflict. Future research utilizing within-family designs as well as cross-cultural data will be useful in adding to our understanding of how sibling conflict and closeness are shaped.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2007). Differential facial resemblance of young children to their parents: Who do children look like more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 135–144.
Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Father–offspring resemblance predicts paternal investment in humans. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 61–69.
Bressan, P., Colarelli, S. M., & Cavalieri, M. B. (2009). Biologically costly altruism depends on emotional closeness among step but not half or full sibling. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 118–132.
Bressan, P., & Kramer, P. (2015). Human kin detection. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(3), 299–311.
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Meeus, W., & Van Aken, M. A. (2002). Developmental patterns in adolescent attachment to mother, father and sibling. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(3), 167–176.
Burch, R. L., & Gallup Jr, G. G. (2000). Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(6), 429–435.
Burch, R. L., Hipp, D., & Platek, S. M. (2006). Paternal investment, phenotypic resemblance, and the social mirror effect. In S. M. Platek & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty evolutionary perspectives on male anti- cuckoldry tactics (pp. 207–223). Cambridge University Press.
Campione-Barr, N., & Smetana, J. G. (2010). “Who said you could wear my sweater?” Adolescent siblings’ conflicts and associations with relationship quality. Child Development, 81(2), 464–471.
Cicirelli, V. (2013). Sibling relationships across the life span. Springer Science & Business Media.
Coyne, S. M., Jensen, A. C., Smith, N. J., & Erickson, D. H. (2016). Super Mario brothers and sisters: Associations between coplaying video games and sibling conflict and affection. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 48–59.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1982). Whom are newborn babies said to resemble? Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(2), 69–78.
Daniel, M. J., & Rodd, F. H. (2021). Kin recognition in guppies uses self-referencing based on olfactory cues. The American Naturalist, 197(2), 176–189.
Danielsbacka, M., & Tanskanen, A. O. (2015). The association between unequal parental treatment and the sibling relationship in Finland: The difference between full and half-siblings. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(2), 492–510.
DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London b: Biological Sciences, 269(1498), 1307–1312.
DeBruine, L. M. (2004). Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(3), 142–154.
DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust- worthy: Context- specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London b: Biological Sciences, 272(1566), 919–922.
Dyble, M., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2020). Contrasts in kinship structure in mammalian societies. Behavioral Ecology, 31(4), 971–977.
Emlen, S. T. (1997). The evolutionary study of human family systems. Social Science Information, 34, 563–589.
Gallup Jr, G. G., Ampel, B. C., Matteo, D. Y., & O’Malley, E. E. (2016). Behavioral resemblance and paternal investment: Which features of the chip off the old block count? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 1.
Gyuris, P., Kozma, L., Kisander, Z., Láng, A., Ferencz, T., & Kocsor, F. (2020). Sibling relations in patchwork families: Co-residence is more influential than genetic relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/psyg.2020.00993
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.
Henkel, S., & Setchell, J. M. (2018). Group and kin recognition via olfactory cues in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1889), 20181527.
Humphries, D. J., Nelson-Flower, M. J., Bell, M. B., Finch, F. M., & Ridley, A. R. (2021). Kinship, dear enemies, and costly combat: The effects of relatedness on territorial overlap and aggression in a cooperative breeder. Ecology and Evolution, 11(23), 17031–17042.
Jankowiak, W., & Diderich, M. (2000). Sibling solidarity in a polygamous community in the USA: Unpacking inclusive fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 125–139.
Jensen, A. C., Whiteman, S. D., & Fingerman, K. L. (2018). Can’t live with or without them: Transitions and young adults’ perceptions of sibling relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 385–395.
Khan, R., Brewer, G., & Archer, J. (2020). Genetic relatedness, emotional closeness and physical aggression: A comparison of full and half sibling experiences. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 167–185.
Leedale, A. E., Lachlan, R. F., Robinson, E. J., & Hatchwell, B. J. (2020). Helping decisions and kin recognition in long-tailed tits: Is call similarity used to direct help towards kin? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1802), 20190565.
Lewis, D. M. (2011). The sibling uncertainty hypothesis: Facial resemblance as a sibling recognition cue. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 969–974.
Lieberman, D. (2009). Rethinking the Taiwanese minor marriage data: Evidence the mind uses multiple kinship cues to regulate inbreeding avoidance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 153–160.
Lieberman, D., & Lobel, T. (2012). Kinship on the Kibbutz: Coresidence duration predicts altruism, personal sexual aversions and moral attitudes among communally reared peers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 26–34.
McGuire, S., Manke, B., Eftekhari, A., & Dunn, J. (2000). Children’s perceptions of sibling conflict during middle childhood: Issues and sibling (dis) similarity. Social Development, 9(2), 173–190.
McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 913–930.
Michalski, R. L., & Euler, H. A. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on sibling relationships. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Family relationships: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 185–204). Oxford University Press.
Neyer, F. J., & Lang, F. R. (2003). Blood is thicker than water: Kinship orientation across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 310–321.
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I., Wasserman, B., & Gallup, Jr, G. G. (2002). Children’s faces: Resemblance affects males but not females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 159–166.
Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 176–185.
Reed, B. W., Segal, N. L., & Miller, S. A. (2021). Evolutionary perspective on decreases in grief intensity for deceased twin and non-twin relatives: An update. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, 110822.
Regalski, J. M., & Gaulin, S. J. (1993). Whom are Mexican infants said to resemble? Monitoring and fostering paternal confidence in the Yucatan. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 97–113.
Salmon, C., & Hehman, J. (2015). Evolutionary perspectives on the nature of sibling conflict: The impact of sex, relatedness, and co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1(2), 123–129.
Salmon, C. A., & Hehman, J. A. (2021). Good friends, better enemies? The effects of Sibling Sex, Co-Residence, and Relatedness on Sibling Conflict and Cooperation. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7(4), 327–337.
Salmon, C. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Michalski, R. L. (2012). Birth order, sex of child, and perceptions of parental favoritism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 357–362.
Segal, N. L. (2005). Evolutionary studies of cooperation, competition, and altruism: A twin-based approach. In R. L. Burgess & K. B. MacDonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development (2nd ed., pp. 265–304). Sage.
Sherman, P. W. (2019). The limits of ground squirrel nepotism. In G. W. Barlow & J. Silverberg (Eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? (pp. 505–544). Routledge.
Steinbach, A., & Hank, K. (2018). Full-, half-, and step-sibling relations in young and middle adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 39(9), 2639–2658.
Stocker, C. M., Gilligan, M., Klopack, E. T., Conger, K. J., Lanthier, R. P., Neppl, T. K., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2020). Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 175–185.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (2006). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Transaction Publishers.
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. Pantheon Books.
Sznycer, D., De Smet, D., Billingsley, J., & Lieberman, D. (2016). Coresidence duration and cues of maternal investment regulate sibling altruism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 159–177.
Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2019). Relationship quality among half siblings: The role of childhood co-residence. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 13–21.
Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., David-Barrett, T., & Rotkirch, A. (2016). Diluted competition? Conflicts between full-and half-siblings in two adult generations. Frontiers in Sociology, 1, 6.
Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., Jokela, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2017). Sibling conflicts in full-and half-sibling households in the UK. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49, 31–47.
Tanskanen, A. O., Danielsbacka, M., & Rotkirch, A. (2021). Kin detection cues and sibling relationship quality in adulthood: The role of childhood co-residence duration and maternal perinatal association. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(6), 481–490.
Tibbetts, G., & Scharfe, E. (2015). Oh, brother (or sister)!: An examination of sibling attachment, conflict, and cooperation in emerging adulthood. Journal of Relationships Research, 6, 1–11.
Tornero, E., Sánchez-Romera, J. F., Morosoli, J. J., Vázquez, A., Gómez, Á., & Ordoñana, J. R. (2018). Altruistic behavior among twins. Human Nature, 29(1), 1–12.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Aldine.
Volk, A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002). The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature, 13(4), 437–455.
Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., Xiong, Q., Jin, S., Zou, H., & Guo, Y. (2019). The more similar, the more warmth: The effect of parent-child perceived facial resemblance on parenting behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 358–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Rebecca L. Burch. Data analysis was performed by Jessica A. Hehman. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
All measures and procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the second author’s institution.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.
Consent for Publication
All authors have consented to be listed on this publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hehman, J.A., Burch, R.L. & Salmon, C.A. Sibling Conflict and Closeness: The Effects of Sex, Number of Siblings, Relatedness, Parental Resemblance and Investment. Evolutionary Psychological Science 9, 224–235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00353-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00353-w