Skip to main content
Log in

Coalitional Value Theory: an Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Culture

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Psychological Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the following article, we forward the coalitional value theory (CVT) and apply it to several puzzles about human behavior. The CVT contends that humans evolved unique mental mechanisms for assessing each other’s marginal value to a coalition (i.e., each other’s coalitional value). They defer to those with higher coalitional value, and they assert themselves over those with lower. We discuss how this mechanism likely evolved. We note that it helps explains how human groups can expand into large, complicated, and specialized coalitions (chiefdoms and even nation states). And we combine this with strong evidence that suggests that status striving is a fundamental human motive to explain partially (1) anti-gay bias, (2) cultural signaling, (3) cultural conceptions of god, and (4) ideological conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D. (1990). How did humans evolve? Reflections on the uniquely unique species. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Brion, S., Moore, D. A., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012a). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 718–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012b). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. B., Holmes, J. G., & Wood, J. V. (2007). Social acceptance and self-esteem: Tuning the sociometer to interpersonal value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1024–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. (1993). A history of god: The 4000-year quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbridge, T. (2012). The crusades: The war for the Holy Land. Simon and Schuster.

  • Atran, S. (2004). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford University Press.

  • Barkow, J. H. (1975). Prestige and culture. Current Anthropology, 16, 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J. H., Akiwowo, A. A., Barua, T. K., Chance, M. R. A., Chapple, E. D., Chattopadhyay, G. P., et al. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation [and comments and replies]. Current Anthropology, 16, 553–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L. (1999). Theological correctness: Cognitive constraint and the study of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 11, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 17671–17674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. (2019). Sex differences in human peer relationships: A primate’s-eye view. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch Jr., M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bering, J. M. (2006). The cognitive psychology of belief in the supernatural: Belief in a deity or an afterlife could be an evolutionarily advantageous by-product of people's ability to reason about the minds of others. American Scientist, 94, 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berreby, D. (2005). Us and them: Understanding your tribal mind. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, P. M. (1999). Human uniqueness: A general theory. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 74, 133–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2009). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press.

  • Boyer, P. (2003). Are ghost concepts “intuitive,” “endemic” and “innate”. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2008). Religion explained. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P., Firat, R., & van Leeuwen, F. (2015). Safety, threat, and stress in intergroup relations: A coalitional index model. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 434–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, M. (2016). Debunking arguments and the cognitive science of religion. Theology and Science, 14, 268–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. (2007). Co-ed combat: The new evidence that women shouldn’t fight our nation’s wars. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E. E., & Trapnell, P. D. (2013). Disgust facilitates outgroup dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 771–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, J. M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., et al. (2014). The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 4747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69, 955–978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, M., & Barrientos, J. E. (2008). The attitudes toward lesbians and gay men scale (ATLG): Adaptation and testing the reliability and validity in Chile. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2015). Competence and the evolutionary origins of status and power in humans. Human Nature, 26, 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2012). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernow, R. (2011). Washington: A life. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, A. (2018). Political tribes: Group instinct and the fate of nations. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. (2013). The last head bangers: NFL football in the rowdy, reckless ‘70s, the era that created modern sports. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A., & Kossowska, M. (2009). Age differences in conservatism: Evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style. Journal of Personality, 77, 51–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. B. (1993). The future of sociobiology: Counting babies or studying proximate mechanisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: some thoughts and clarifications. Social science information, 44, 603-620.

  • Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10, 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. (2007). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Abdalla, I. A., et al. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? 1. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, E. (1990). What is art for? Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (2018). The Oxford history of the French revolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., Olmstead, B., & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubreuil, B. (2010). Human evolution and the origins of hierarchies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, K. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Silk, J. B. (2007). Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities. Current Biology, 17, R586–R587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, W. (1944). Caesar and Christ; the story of civilization (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (1990). Jocks & burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. H. (2006). Washington’s crossing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 10–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1993). Just world beliefs in twelve societies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2014). Gay and lesbian rights. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx. October 25, 2019.

  • Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1699–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, I. C., Brent, L. J., Wroblewski, E. E., Rudicell, R. S., Hahn, B. H., Goodall, J., & Pusey, A. E. (2013). Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67(3), 373–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, D. (2017). The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., & Von Rueden, C. (2006). Hunting, social status and biological fitness. Social Biology, 53, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Paragon.Fur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413

  • Hastings, B. M., & Shaffer, B. (2008). Authoritarianism: The role of threat, evolutionary psychology, and the will to power. Theory & Psychology, 18, 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., Barton, M., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009). The emergence of human uniqueness: Characters underlying behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božičević, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hewlett, B., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, C., & Fessler, D. M. (2013). Sizing up the threat: The envisioned physical formidability of terrorists tracks their leaders’ failures and successes. Cognition, 127, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, V., Proctor, D., Bonnie, K. E., Whiten, A., & de Waal, F. B. (2010). Prestige affects cultural learning in chimpanzees. PLoS One, 5, e10625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 443–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as a mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. H. (1941). The struggle for judicial supremacy: A study of a crisis in American power politics. New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530, 473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judis, J. B. (2016). The populist explosion: How the great recession transformed American and European politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, T., & Cohrs, J. C. (2008). The evolution of authoritarian processes: Fostering cooperation in large-scale groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 73–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2001). Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 921–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & O'Brien, E. (2007). Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMar, L., & Kite, M. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Haupt, A. L., Strausser, K. S., & Chokel, J. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and the state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Y. (2016). The fractured republic: Renewing America’s social contract in the age of individualism. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2005). The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C. H., Huberman, B. A., & Stout, S. (2000). Status competition and performance in work groups. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. M., Lynch, J. J., Machiran, N. M., Thomas, S. A., Malinow, K., & L. (1982). The effect of status on blood pressure during verbal communication. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCulloch, D. (2010). Christianity: The first three thousand years. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald Jr., A. P., & Games, R. G. (1976). Some characteristics of those who hold positive and negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v01n01_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., Sedikides, C., & de Waal-Andrews, W. G. (2016). Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders: Comparing Hierometer and Sociometer theories of self-regard. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2018). Is self-regard a sociometer or a hierometer? Self-esteem tracks status and inclusion, narcissism tracks status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000189.

  • Maner, J. K., & Case, C. R. (2016). Dominance and prestige: Dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. In J. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 129–180). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. P., Tracy, J. L., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Status signals: Adaptive benefits of displaying and observing the nonverbal expressions of pride and shame. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2002). The communist manifesto (S. Moore, Trans.). London: Penguin (Original work published 1848).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual selection shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner Jr., M. (1994). Status and sacredness: A general theory of status relations and an analysis of Indian culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M. B. (1987). On cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. American Anthropologist, 89, 617–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (2012). Coming apart: The state of White America, 1960–2010. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. (2008). The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 242–248.

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). On the Genealogy of Morals (W. Kauffman, trans.). New York, NY: Vintage (original work published in 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2005). ‘Dude, you’re a fag’: Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities, 8, 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. Q. (2005). Meat sharing for coalitional support. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2010). The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8993–8999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. C. (2001). The quest for modern manhood: Masculine stereotypes, peer culture and the social significance of homophobia. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorthuis, A. M. G., Thomaes, S., van Aken, M. A. G., Denissen, J. J. A., & de Castro, B. O. (2014). Social Development, 23, 770–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader–follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokosch, M. D., Yeo, R. A., & Miller, G. F. (2005). Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability. Intelligence, 33, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2015). The reputation of punishers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 683–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S., Levinger, G., & Lippitt, R. (1961). Perceived sources of social power. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, W. (2017). The great leveler: Violence and the history of inequality from the stone age to the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23, 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1980). Marx: A very short introduction. Oxford, England, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2018). The cultural evolution of shamanism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41.

  • Singh, M., & Boomsma, J. J. (2015). Policing and punishment across the domains of social evolution. Oikos, 124, 971–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2001). The stag hunt. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 75, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, L., Gilbert, P., & Hasey, G. (2003). Evolved mechanisms in depression: The role and interaction of attachment and social rank in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smaldino, P. E. (2020). Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural Processes.

  • Smith, E. A. (2004). Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? Human Nature, 15, 343–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Wilhelm, J. D. (2004). “I just like being good at it”: The importance of competence in the literate lives of young men. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47, 454–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 211–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (2001). The quest for cosmic justice. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation. Current Anthropology., 53, 673–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Shariff, A. F., Zhao, W., & Henrich, J. (2013). Cross-cultural evidence that the nonverbal expression of pride is an automatic status signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. G. (2003). Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study. Cambridge University Press.

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truett, K. R. (1993). Age differences in conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turke, P. W., & Betzig, L. L. (1985). Those who can do: Wealth, status, and reproductive success on Ifaluk. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, F., Miton, H., Firat, R. B., & Boyer, P. (2016). Perception of gay men as defectors and commitment to group defense predict aggressive homophobia. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voland, E. (1990). Differential reproductive success within the Krummhörn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2223–2232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonasch, A. J., Reynolds, T., Winegard, B. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). Death before dishonor: Incurring costs to protect moral reputation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 604–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley Jr., B. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. (2005). Sex differences in pain perception. Gender Medicine, 2, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegard, B. M., Winegard, B., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Eastwood’s brawn and Einstein’s brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegard, B., Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Plant, E. A. (2016). The coalitional value theory of antigay bias. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10, 245–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The status competition model of cultural production. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1–21.

  • Wrangham, R. W., & Glowacki, L. (2012). Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 23, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2001). Nonzero: The logic of human destiny. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N. (1979). The decline and rise of Mesopotamian civilization: An ethnoarchaeological perspective on the evolution of social complexity. American Antiquity, 44, 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1999). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Winegard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winegard, B., Kirsch, A., Vonasch, A. et al. Coalitional Value Theory: an Evolutionary Approach to Understanding Culture. Evolutionary Psychological Science 6, 301–318 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00235-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00235-z

Keywords

Navigation